Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember When "Laid Off" Didn't Mean "Permanently Fired?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 01:54 PM
Original message
Remember When "Laid Off" Didn't Mean "Permanently Fired?"
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 01:57 PM by stopbush
When I was a lad, "laid off" was a term used mainly in the unionized trades and industries. It meant that you still had a job, but there wasn't enough work to go around, so the company you worked for laid you off TEMPORARILY. The idea was that you would go back to work once things picked up.

Nowadays, people are fired from their jobs, ie: the job is over, there will be no more work and you will not be rehired, nor will you return to your job when things pick up. But everybody calls it being "laid off" because the term retains its feeling of hope from what it USED to mean, ie: that you'd be back at that job in short order.

People are being fired these days, NOT laid off, not downsized or (yek!) "right-sized." They are being FIRED.

So, when you hear that someone has just "laid off" 20,000 employees, realize that those 20,000 people have just been fired. It's as permanent as Sarah Palin's stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rob H. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yup.
My aunt used to work at Ralston-Purina years ago (back before they were called Protein Technologies) and when they laid people off they would actually bring them back when they could afford to. My dad got laid off about six years ago from one of his jobs when what they were really doing was firing people--they expressly told people that even if business picked up again they wouldn't be rehired! Of course, my aunt worked at a unionized company and my dad didn't....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. I know what you mean
but I think the term laid off is now used because being fired has come to mean "terminated for cause".

"Laid off" is now associated with let go, usually but not always, due to financial constraints or restructuring.

I see the term "furloughed" now being used with people let go but with the possibility of being picked up again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. My dad would get laid off for a week or two a year for several years
He did sewing for a living in a factory. If he was laid off it was always just a couple of weeks at the most. Mostly, it was in between contracts that the factory owner had with stores.

I remember it was only in the late 1960s and early 1970s when dad finally retired. That was when the factories were starting to relocate south or to Asia. Before they named it "outsourcing".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Mine too - it happened a few times in the early '70s
He was an electronic design engineer in the aerospace industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. The usual reply to being informed that someone was laid off was 'when you expect to go back?'
Because that was exactly wat was expected. Times were slow so you got laid off, then as soon as it picked back up they'd call you back and life would go on. It certainly happened all the time in the Construction trades and also in manufacturing. It might come from slow sales, it might come from retooling for a revised or new product. However it wasn't the same thing as losing a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Laid off" was also used in white-collar jobs to mean "Your job has been eliminated"
That happened to me in a number of volatile industries -- e.g., aerospace, mining. There was no intent to hire me or my coworkers back at some point.

It's still that way. If the companies are able to start hiring again in the future, they start the process from scratch with new applicants; the previous job holders have no special in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. i always associated with permantly fired, but... cause job not there anymore, not cause
the employee did something wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Same here.
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 09:11 PM by BerryBush
"Laid off," "downsized," "rightsized," whatever the catchphrase management-speak du jour happens to be, it's always meant the same thing to me...your job is history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yup. The last one laid off was the first one re-hired ...
... and nobody else was hired until all laid-off workers were rehired or refused due to having another job. Organized labor was stronger in those days, only 40-50 years ago or so. Everyone benefited from unions, even non-union folks.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. for me 'laid-off' means i can collect unemployment comp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC