Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gonzo's Lawyer Quits Civil Case. Another Sign That Prosecutor Is Circling?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 06:28 PM
Original message
Gonzo's Lawyer Quits Civil Case. Another Sign That Prosecutor Is Circling?
It's looking more and more like prosecutor Nora Dannehy's investigation into the US Attorney firings has Alberto Gonzales in its crosshairs.

Earlier this week we reported that Dannehy had contacted the ex-AG in connection with the probe.

Now, we've been tipped to legal filings showing that Gonzales' lawyer, George Terwilliger Jr. of White & Case, is no longer representing Gonzo in a separate case, a civil suit alleging that law students were denied DOJ jobs thanks to illegal politicization at the department under Gonzales.

The filing, dated November 25, reads:
Please enter the withdrawal of George J. Terwilliger III as counsel in this case for Defendant Alberto R. Gonzales, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.6(b).
Beneath that, Gonzales has signed his name, giving his consent to the withdrawal.

The previous day, in a separate filing, Gonzales had officially introduced a new team of attorneys as replacements, it would appear, for Terwilliger.
Please enter the appearance of Vincent H. Cohen, Jr., Peter Taylor, Lisa Fishberg and the law firm of Schertler & Onorato, LLP, on behalf of Defendant Alberto R. Gonzales.
What does this have to do with the Dannehy investigation?

It would appear that the most obvious reason for Terwilliger to withdraw from the civil suit is to be able to devote additional time to Dannehy's more serious investigation into criminal wrong-doing.


http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/12/gonzos_lawyer_quits_civil_case.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe the lawyer heard that Bush is going to pardon Gonzo
I hope Dannehy does not grab this haul before PE Obama is inaugurated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Just one more reason to get paid before beginning legal work for any of these clowns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Timing is everything because Bush needs a specific crime
to pardon and is not allowed to pardon carte blanche. I hope
she can drag it out and on Jan 21 press charges against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Bingo
Let them sweat. No charges before Jan 22.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's the smart way to play it--no charges until after the inauguration! I'm rubbing
my hands in anticipation of just how many lawsuits will be filed after January 20, '09!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Nah, Bush can pardon him for anything
After all, Ford pardoned Nixon for anything Nixon might have done. There were no specific charges brought, and Nixon got to walk away from arguably the worst crimes in American history (due to his elevated position of trust).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Sure, he can pardon carte blanche.
The Nixon and Weinberger pardons were carte blanche.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Um, Where does that come from?
Ford didn't need charges to pardon Nixon.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nradisic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Fitzmas?
Wow. That would be a Christmas present...Gonzo being frogmarched? Who's next? Turd Blossom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC