Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Remember Pearl Harbor!"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:55 PM
Original message
"Remember Pearl Harbor!"
http://www.truthout.org/120708A

Sunday 07 December 2008

by: John Lamperti, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Pearl Harbor.
Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941. (Photo: National Archive and Records Administration)

"Pre-emptive" war, then and now.

The name Pearl Harbor resonates in American history; it is synonymous with the U.S. entry into World War II. It stands for tragedy - and for treachery. On December 7, 1941, Japanese carrier-based aircraft attacked United States naval and air forces in the Hawaiian Islands, and scored a major victory. Over 2,300 U.S. military personnel lost their lives - almost half of them when the battleship Arizona was blown up and sunk by bombs and torpedoes. The U. S. Pacific fleet was devastated.<1> The next day President Franklin Roosevelt called for a declaration of war, and described December 7, 1941, and the Japanese attack as "a date which will live in infamy."

But why, exactly, was the Pearl Harbor attack "infamous"? The Japanese planes attacked strictly military targets and there were relatively few civilian casualties.<2> The battle was a terrible blow for the American forces, which were taken completely by surprise. But a surprise attack is not infamous in wartime; every military commander would like to attack by surprise if possible. Nor did the bitter facts of U.S. defeat and heavy losses make the raid criminal. President Roosevelt used the word "infamy" because the raid was an act of military aggression. Until that moment Japan and the United States were not at war, although their conflicting interests had been threatening to boil over. The attack turned a dispute into a war; Pearl Harbor was a crime because the Japanese struck first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Before Bush "Doctrine," pre-emptive war was considered a bad thing.
Edited on Sun Dec-07-08 08:57 PM by anonymous171
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. we never do....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Baghdad & Tenochtitlán, Historical Parallels
Sat Nov-06-2004

On the day we invaded Iraq I ended a friendship over this issue. This is the text of the last letter I sent her. Somehow, knowing that I was right, has not cleared the taste of ashes and gall from my mouth. I am so ashamed of what we have done. And heartbroken that nearly half my countrymen still cannot see the horror:


March 23, 2003

I deeply regret to hear that you agree with this bellicose position. How many atrocities will we tolerate now and point to 9/11 as an excuse? We've already leveled Afghanistan. Now we're leveling Iraq, which even our own intelligence sources say has no links to Al Qaeda. We've launched a preemptive war against Iraq losing all claim of moral superiority over Imperial Japan for attacking Pearl Harbor.

more at link...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=2624110&mesg_id=2624296
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petersjo02 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. I was born that day.
Now 67. Used to be that people always recognized that date as Pearl Harbor Day. Now that I'm older, not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. The old Pearl Harbor or the new one?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Pearl Harbor is circling around the memory hole.
What the Japanese did used to be a crime. Not any longer, bu$h took care of that.
And that is why we are forgetting. We are no better now than the Japanese were then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bullshit. Pearl Harbor was part of a larger pattern of abuse and aggression throughout the Pacific.
Manchuria was a crime because Japan struck first.
Corregidor was a crime because Japan struck first.
Hong Kong was a crime because Japan struck first.
Singapore was a crime because Japan struck first.
Korea was a crime because Japan struck first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You're absolutely right...
...Japan was out to conquer the world...let's not forget the Baatan Death march or the prison camps on the Japanese mainland...this truthout is just BS. Why do some people always try to prove that throughout history the United States has always been wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Indeed. WWII wasn't our fault. We were the Good Guys. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC