Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Afghanistan be Obama's Tragic Folly?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 06:02 AM
Original message
Will Afghanistan be Obama's Tragic Folly?

Norman Solomon
Posted December 9, 2008 | 02:21 AM (EST)

Will Afghanistan be Obama's Tragic Folly?

Sunday morning, before dawn, I read in the New York Times that "the Pentagon is planning to add more than 20,000 troops to Afghanistan" within the next 18 months -- "raising American force levels to about 58,000" in that country. Then I scraped ice off a windshield and drove to the C-SPAN studios, where a picture window showed a serene daybreak over the Capitol dome.

While I was on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal" for a live interview, the program aired some rarely seen footage with the voices of two courageous politicians who challenged the warfare state.

So, on Sunday morning, viewers across the country saw Barbara Lee speaking on the House floor three days after 9/11 -- just before she became the only member of Congress to vote against the president's green-light resolution to begin the U.S. military attack on Afghanistan.

"However difficult this vote may be, some of us must urge the use of restraint," she said. The date was Sept. 14, 2001. Congresswoman Lee continued: "Our country is in a state of mourning. Some of us must say, Let's step back for a moment, let's just pause just for a minute, and think through the implications of our actions today so that this does not spiral out of control."

And she said: "As we act, let us not become the evil that we deplore."

<more>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/norman-solomon/will-afghanistan-be-obama_b_149501.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. ...
Edited on Tue Dec-09-08 06:17 AM by Mari333
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. "As we act, let us not become the evil that we deplore." Warning graphic images.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. everyone should see this. thank you for posting. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Could happen
Seems like the good fellow has been brainwashed into thinking there is a future for Americans in Afghanistan. We know better. The Russians know better.

Afghanistan is known as the place where empires go to die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. No empire has help on to it for long...
Not even Alexander the Great could do it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. The Taliban have our supply lines firmly in their sights
They took out 160 military vehicles being sent to bolster our troops. I call bullshit the "official statement" that it didn't represent a significant loss. 160 vehicles? That's a rout. A disaster. A catastrophe. If we lose the supply lines we lose the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Oh
We're gonna lose the 'war'. It's just a matter of time. And dead soldiers. And dead civilians. And wasted fortunes.

And for what do we waste all that? I've yet to hear one reasonable explanation for doing this 'war'. Fine, people need to be liberated, but right here in our country people need liberation. If it is humanity that concerns us, we should bring anyone who wants to be free to our country. Cheaper and more humane than killing. Just pull everyone who wants peace out, and leave the bad guys to kill themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I originally agreed with going after Bin Laden and the Taliban in concept.
But I thought, given the lessons of Vietnam and the one good decision Bush I made by NOT escalating Desert Storm to an occupation, that it would be done the way it should. As a criminal case with your targets being the main ringleaders, not the entire country surrounding them.

I thought maybe we had become smart enough to realize that terrorism, as it always has been, should be the realm of agencies like the FBI. Find out who the right people to go after are, exactly where they are, make sure your case is air tight and THEN send in the military, or better yet small special forces teams, to go get the fuckers.

You don't bring a fraction of your army and a lot of your air force and bomb the place even closer to the stone age than it already is and piss off a populace that has no fear and has nothing to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Exactly

"You don't bring a fraction of your army and a lot of your air force and bomb the place even closer to the stone age than it already is and piss off a populace that has no fear and has nothing to lose.


I didn't think we should have ever invaded. A quick get in and get out, as a last resort, maybe.

But to send a miniscuale(sp?) amount of force into a country that eats miniscuale forces is just plain idiotic.... or diabolical if you are a president that is hiding something.

And those people over there are now our enemies. We made enemies of them. We are totally in the wrong and if Obama doesn't see that, well, death and destruction will continue with no end in sight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Actually, 260.
It's a campaign to choke NATO/US out. The militants believe they can have us out by the end of 2009, by keeping the supply lines cut off.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=4609360&mesg_id=4609360
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. That's all it takes
It's how they waited out the Russians I'm sure. Our stinger missles helped but it was the will of a vastly outnumbered and outgunned opponent that beat Moscow, not any weapons system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Well, given the rousing success of the Russians and
the British before them ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah, but you guys are Americans, right?
You're exceptional!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. I have never had much hope for a positive outcome of the
adventure in Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. It is the one real point of concern I have
with Obama's policies. It will not end until we leave. And, soldiers will die until then. It is unwinnable at best. It is the 21st Century Vietnam, most likely. Worst case.....shudder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Not that I'd normally advocate the same kind of deception Bush is likely to do
But perhaps President Obama's best first move on Afghanistan would be to produce a corpse, call it Bin Laden then declare victory and come home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yes. Call it done. Declare bi Laden dead or irrelevant and end it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. We don't need to colonize Afghanistan... get in establish some order, get out
And get as many terrorist organizers as you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. No. It will be a mild success. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. its already a tragic folly. staying there will only make it more so n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
21. Two options; he either he withdraws, very unlikely and carries a whole
freight-car of negatives with it, or he realizes that what is needed is not more destruction, but construction. That is how Bin Laden became popular in the first place. We gave weapons to the psychos that were the enemy of our enemy and left. Bin Laden stayed and built very little, but far more than us or the Russians. Afghanistan cannot be taken with military force, period.

A significant military presence will be required to be sure, but not in conquering mode, rather as protectors of an army of native builders. Give them the jobs and means to rebuild and improve their country and they will gladly get rid of the Taliban.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. we need our tax money to go to creating jobs here
not nation building somewhere else where they dont even want us to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. !!!
:thumbsup: x3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. We've already invested in nation destroying, so we have a responsibility
to fix it. Failure to do this will, absolutely without question, result in more problems, more death, more terrorism, more torture, more heroin production, etc.

It is far cheaper to help them see us as better than the previous invaders that have plagued that part of the world for centuries. The Roman Empire lasted a thousand years, primarily because the people that lived in the conquered nation's lives were better under Roman Rule than they were under the deposed despot.

Do you imagine that they like rule under the Taliban or the oil/energy companies, that they chose to live in hovels with no roads, no power or running water, no schools, no hospitals, no hope?

Whoever goes in and makes their lives better will win.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC