Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jesse Jackson, Jr is 'Senate Candidate #5!'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:00 PM
Original message
Jesse Jackson, Jr is 'Senate Candidate #5!'
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 12:03 PM by Shiver
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/09/senate-candidate-5-in-bla_n_149682.html

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/ConductUnbecoming/story?id=6431739&page=1

ABC News' Brian Ross is reporting that Jesse Jackson, Jr. is "Senate Candidate #5" in the Blagojevich indictment:

Chicago Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-IL) is the anonymous "Senate Candidate #5" whose emissaries Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich reportedly claimed offered up to a million dollars to name him to the U.S. Senate, federal law enforcement sources tell ABC News. <...>


Jackson Jr. said this morning he was contacted yesterday by federal prosecutors in Chicago who he said "asked me to come in and share with them my insights and thoughts about the selection process."

Jackson Jr. said "I don't know" when asked if he was Candidate #5, but said he was told "I am not a target of this investigation."

Jackson Jr. said he agreed to talk with federal investigators "as quickly as possible" after he consults with a lawyer.

The Congressman, a son of the famed civil rights leader, denied that anyone had been authorized to make payments or promises to the Governor on his behalf.


*****

Currently looking around for more verification to this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Republicans are going to have a field day with this, sadly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:05 PM
Original message
I'm still hoping that either it's not true,
or that Blago was grossly exaggerating what he thought he could get from Number Five...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. I really, really hope this isn''t true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. My opinion is that Blogo's word is mud; I don't believe a damned thing
he says, from yesterday until the man gets psychiatric help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Agreed
I think he may have been exaggerating what he thought he could get, not saying that he was promised it or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Exactly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. When did idle speculation become worthy of "legitimate" news? I heard the same last night
(as well as another name mentioned as #1) but no corrboration from prosecutors means it's simple rumor IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. So you will believe that one politician would sell a senate seat but refuse to believe that a
another politician would buy one?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Who's refusing?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. And wasn't Jesse,Jr Obama's campaign manager for Illinois?
Or what official position did he hold in the campaign? Here we go again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. I was afraid of that the most. I figured he's one the GOP's targets.
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 12:46 PM by TexasObserver
If this was only about the governor, they would have taken him down a long time. Are we to believe they've been investigating him for three years and just NOW made a case they can assert?

This is intended to pull down a number of Democrats, and force some of them to roll on others.

Fitz is likely just a useful idiot, rather than the architect. Too bad he didn't find his "moral fortitude" in time for the Plame case.


(edited to make the easily injured happy)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. You don't need to have "balls" to have moral fortitude. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Chutzpah. Happy now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. That's awfully white of you! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. They didn't have the evidence on the governor until recently
They were only able to obtain wiretaps a few weeks ago, and the investigation only picked up a few months back when he tried to kill a piece of ethics legislation in the State Senate.

Investigations go on for as long as they have to - yes, sometimes even for three years and longer - until they can get the hard evidence they need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Someone is finally trying to clean this state up,
and Dems in other states are bitching about it. Nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. Methinks he's in a world of shit then. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC