Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Author (Cockburn): A soldier asked Rumsfeld - shouldn't you have been more patient with WMD search?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 09:31 AM
Original message
Author (Cockburn): A soldier asked Rumsfeld - shouldn't you have been more patient with WMD search?

http://www.truthdig.com/interview/page2/20070315_andrew_cockburns_rumsfeld_revelations/

<snip>

Harris: What do you think Donald Rumsfeld would say if he had a chance to respond to you about what you’ve written?

Cockburn: Oh, he’d probably say I was peddling al-Qaida disinformation. He’d change the subject. You know he’s very good at—I mean if he really chose to discuss it in detail, which he certainly wouldn’t, he would, he’d blame someone else. I mean there was a very telling moment I put at the end of the book where he, just a few days before he finally left the Pentagon, he went on a farewell tour to Iraq. And he went around various bases and he loved to have these town meetings where the soldiers who probably had better things to do but they would all be marched to sit in ranks in front and behind him so that, you know, make a nice picture, and he would lecture them, give of his wisdom for a bit and then invite questions ... this is the secretary of defense and they’re just poor soldiers in the field.... But in Mosul, a base outside Mosul this last time, one soldier got up and said: Don’t you think you wish now you’d been, shown a little bit more patience? In looking for, you know, the inspections, looking for weapons of mass destruction before you invaded Iraq? You know, don’t you think you should have waited awhile? And Rumsfeld said, “Interesting. But you’re talking to the wrong guy. It was the president who made that decision, the Congress made that decision.”

In other words right up to the very end he can’t face up to the fact, in front of the guys he’s put in harm’s way, he can’t face up to the fact that he sent them. You know that it was his decision. Oh, no, it was the president. It was the Congress. It was Rumsfeld all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hadrons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dumsfail is using the Crusty the Clown defense ....
'Don't Look At Me; I didn't do it!!!'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, come ON, now!! You go to war with the WMD searches you HAVE, NOT the WMD searches you would
LIKE to have, after all!!

Do I need to toss out one of these :sarcasm: for the irony-challenged?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. And you go to war with the SECDEF you have, not the one you would like to have...
Edited on Wed Mar-21-07 10:06 AM by Dhalgren
Man, this could just go on and on. But I think that it is telling that one of the Ubercons is now saying "it was Congress who started this war". That is more telling than anything I have heard, yet. A new talking point was born amid the rubble of lives and country in Iraq - "Congress started the Iraq War"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah, the GOP will probably blame "we, the people" next! After all, WE sent those bums to Congress,
so it's OUR fault!!!

They just love to point that finger of blame anywhere and everywhere but at the 'Fearless Leader' who got us in this shitty fix!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Weapon inspectors were reporting to Bush and to the UN, not congress.
Bush invaded DESPITE the call of many in congress to let the weapon inspections continue to prove military force was not needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I can just see the article title in the WSJ or Moony Times,
"Why Congress went to war in Iraq: A Look at the Justifications Used by Congress for Its Failed War in Iraq"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Exactly. Congress Forced Bush to Invade Iraq Despite His Misgivings
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. remember to Bush (Rove) it's all about how history will perceive him
seems like BushCo is trying to give history some pointers :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Here's Rumsfled clearing all the misunderstandings.
...there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns -- the ones we don't know we don't know."


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC