Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Siegelman: Obama Administration Will NOT Let Rove Off The Hook

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:22 PM
Original message
Siegelman: Obama Administration Will NOT Let Rove Off The Hook
Edited on Thu Dec-11-08 12:24 PM by kpete
Siegelman: Obama Administration Will Not Let Rove Off The Hook
by RogerShuler
Thu Dec 11, 2008 at 09:07:09 AM PST

Cross Posted at Legal Schnauzer

A key Congressional leader has assured former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman that a Barack Obama administration will seek to hold Bush White House strategist Karl Rove accountable for possible interference with the U.S. Justice Department.

"I was at the Democratic National Convention and I asked (Rep.) John Conyers (the Democratic chairman of the House Judiciary Committee) if Rove would be pursued in the next administration," Siegelman said. "And he said--and I quote--'Let me put your fears to rest; it will happen. We are committed to the long haul.'"

Siegelman's comments came in an exclusive interview on Tuesday evening with Tommy Stevenson of the Tuscaloosa News. Earlier that day, Siegelman was at the U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta for oral arguments on his appeal. http://blogs.tuscaloosanews.com/default.asp?item=2298546

Siegelman long has maintained that Rove was at the heart of a Republican plan to prosecute him on bogus charges. The trial ended with convictions against Siegelman and former HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy.

"We have evidence that Rove was involved and sworn testimony," Siegelman said. "This could be the string that unravels the whole Rove criminal enterprise."


more:
http://legalschnauzer.blogspot.com/2008/12/siegelman-obama-administration-will-not.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Believe it when I see the indictment
not before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Yes, AND the actual conviction. Here's hoping it happens. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good to hear, but I'm skeptical
Substantial evidence will be needed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fla nocount Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. If it came from Conyers it must be true.
I feel that emoticons cheapen dialogue so I'll state that I'm being sarcastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. No need for visual aids, your intent and tone were quite apparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Ha!
I like emoticons, but I figured you were being sarcastic. I'm a bit pessimistic myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Congress should have acted before Siegelman's appeal was heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. right, right. it could happen.
cuz i know that john has fulfilled his promise to impeach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've got infinite patience. These kinds of things seem to require it.
Now back to the logging. I climbed out of a tree to post this. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. We need to send a message to all future Roves. Good Call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. can Bush issue a blanket pardon for him even if there are no specific
charges?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. how long, though can it be delayed?
that is the real question for Conyers.

Apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'll believe it when I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. He's quoting the same John Conyers who disappeared in a puff of non-impeachment hearing
smoke? The same John Conyers who wrote a book on election theft, then did nothing about it?

Wow. Siegelman must really feel confident Rove's gonna get his just desserts.

Not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fla nocount Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. That's him, the one whose wife is being investigated by the FBI...
for corruption and bribery charges as a Detroit City Council-Woman and likes to pick bar fights and threaten to shoot Mayor's aides. Yep, that's the one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. While I no longer have any faith that John Conyers
will do jack shit. I believe that Gov. Don will not let this go. But even that largely depends on how the judge will rule on his appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillieW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. He is waiting until he is pres. so Bush can not pardon him HA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. I highly recommend this. And for non believers, if Rep. John Conyers
says it, I believe it. What worries me is the in between now and Jan 20.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. What would make you believe Conyers about this?
He broke his promise on impeachment and election reform. And, now he gonna keep his word??????


I won't believe it until I see Rove either testifying before Conyers, or in a jail cell for contempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
20. Conyers is full of hot air
he loves to have hearings but never actually does anything. I'll believe it when I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC