Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's first test - not to stay "loyal" to Emanuel if the guy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 10:59 AM
Original message
Obama's first test - not to stay "loyal" to Emanuel if the guy
Edited on Sat Dec-13-08 11:09 AM by marylanddem
was in any way shape or form involved in deal-making. The guy's attitude appears to suck. Obama owes him nothing. If Emanuel had ANYTHING CLOSE to a deal-making meeting with that Illinois rat governor he needs to step aside. Or be let go. This is worsening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. per the MSP Star-Trib:
Sources say Obama's chief of staff is not a target in the Illinois corruption investigation
By NEDRA PICKLER and LARA JAKES JORDAN , Associated Press

Last update: December 12, 2008 - 4:08 PM

WASHINGTON - People who have been briefed on the Illinois governor corruption investigation say Barack Obama chief of staff Rahm Emanuel is not a target of the probe. Emanuel, a Chicago congressman who would have been a likely contact between the Obama transition office and Gov. Rod Blagojevich, has been a focus of media attention since Obama said Thursday he has asked for an internal review of contacts between his staff and Blagojevich.

Emanuel has been refusing to answer questions about whether he's the "president-elect adviser" referred to in the criminal complaint that accuses Blagojevich of putting Obama's Senate seat up for sale. The complaint does not say that Blagojevich ever spoke to the unidentified Obama adviser about the Senate seat. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.startribune.com/politics/36067274.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Deal Making"...
There have been reports around Chicago media that it was Rahm who dropped the dime on Blago when he caught wind of the "deal making"...and then contacted Fitzgerald. Now you'd think that if Emanuel were either playing the game why would he call the DA of all people?

Emmanuel's job included contact with Blago's office...not only about the Senate seat but also his own vacancy as well as to stay clear of any selection that may also be on Obama's list for an administrative position. It'd sure be embarassing if the same name came out for different jobs. Also, as COS, Emmanuel needs to know who he's dealing with on Capitol Hill and a vested interest that the Illinois Senate vacancy be filled quickly. Blago was dragging his feet...we now are starting to find out why.

People need to differentiate a bribe from other considerations that are played by politicians all the time. It's shoveling money from one's campaign fund to another or political interest group or charity...while many here will think it's wrong, it is legal and is how the power game is played. Blago kept hinting he was looking to run again in 2010 and would face a tough primary...the money game is not unusual under those circumstances...not just in Illinois, but virtually everywhere.

So if Emmanuel is soooo stupid to get involved in selling a Senate seat or even trying to cover it up, then he needs to go. But this man is anything but stupid...as opposed to Blago...and may even appear to be the one who helped bring this fraud to light. Wow...a public official actually turning in a political lawbreaker? I know it's a rare occurance...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Rahm has had nothing to do with it per Fitzgerald. Why the jumping to conclusions
not based on any real evidence???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. How very Republican your thread title is !
If Rahm had been willing to make any deals then Blagojevich wouldn't have cussed out Obama in those tapes.

Rahm would have known that Obama didn't need to disregard his own principles to make deals with a governor who had already given Illinois so much grief.

Republican pundits, broadcast media and the RNC are desperately trying to find any evidence of Obama being involved with such deal-making and you are ready to go along their track.

Obama is not that stupid. He would not have selected a Chief of Staff who was stupid enough to make deals with such a disgusting governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC