Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Comparison Seen As Unfair to Dogs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 08:54 AM
Original message
Bush Comparison Seen As Unfair to Dogs
This is the question now raised in Iraq: If they throw shoes at your face are you a combat troop or a noncombat troop? The answer may be important in helping to guide President Elect Obama's strategy of reducing but continuing the genocidal occupation that has made a shoeless journalist one of the most beloved, if little known, people in the world overnight.

A related dilemma is this: If shoes become weapons, were the metal detectors, searches, and bribes to phony journalists successful? This strikes me as a similar question to the following: if box cutters become weapons, were the nuclear arsenal, the missile offense shield, and the empire of bases successful?

That all depends upon what the goal was, I suppose. If the goal encompassed the well-being of only one person, then success may have been achieved. Dallas mansion, six-figure speeches, and drunk golfing here I come! But no dog's goal would ever be so narrow, and animal rights groups can be expected to speak out against Muntadar al-Zeidi's comparison of George W. Bush to a dog. I also hope human rights groups will be closely monitoring the well-being of this shoe-throwing hero to billions.

I don't advocate violence, even in response to violence, much less as substitution for words, and yet it seems to me that al-Zeidi has restored the good standing of journalists in the world. He's punctuated his brief editorial with a statement in the universal language of television. A cream pie would have helped but would probably have tipped off the Secret Service to his plans. With the toss of two shoes, this journalist communicated more honest information to more people than a thousand New York Times exposes on aluminum tubes or expert commentaries on the Pentagon paid for by the Pentagon.

Here's a little of what he communicated: no technology, no weaponry, and no propaganda can protect you from the results of mistreating millions of human beings. Iraq has been made a living hell. Everyone there has suffered and lost people they loved because of the callous greed and self-centered calculations of George W. Bush who has blood up to his shoulders after waging an illegal aggressive war for politics, money, oil, and bases from which to murder human beings in neighboring countries while seated at the safe distance of the Oval Office.

The question we should really ponder is not why al-Zeidi could be so impolite as to throw his shoes at Bush, but why the dozens of other shoes in the room remained on people's feet, why no foot odor ever purifies the air at a White House press conference, why a man who throws his shoes at our president is more popular with the people I've spoken to here in O'Hare Airport in Chicago than our president himself and yet most Americans are not working with all the advantages we have to put our nation right with the people of Iraq by prosecuting and imprisoning not just petty crook governors of Illinois but also emperors whose nudity has to be exposed by other people taking off their shoes.

When I worked for ACORN six years ago and Bush was pushing a plan to eliminate welfare that had been written by a slimy character at the Heritage Foundation who believed pushing women to get married would do more good than transportation, child care, education, a living wage, or even protection from abusive husbands, we took a few hundred people into the Heritage Foundation building in D.C. and pelted the guy with shoes until he agreed to "walk a day in the shoes" of some of our members on welfare. He later did so, and it changed his mind to some degree, as he admitted to reporters covering the story.

When I worked to expose Bush's war lies three years ago, we took a crowd of people with a petition from tens of thousands to present at the White House gate. When the guards would not accept our petition, we hurled hundreds of pages of white paper over the White House fence, scattering them all across the lawn of our finest public housing.

I recall these two actions only because it occurs to me that people often walk by the White House with shoes on their feet that could perhaps be put to better use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Brilliant! This line sums it up perfectly!
"With the toss of two shoes, this journalist communicated more honest information to more people than a thousand New York Times exposes"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely brilliant
Hope to see this great Op Ed in M$Greedia.

K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you David!
I hope that thousands in D.C. absolutely pepper that tainted lawn yards high with shoes of pure and justifiable rage!

Let people around the world know how we feel about the emperor-in-chief!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Great writing! I think we could all hang shoes from our vehicles or windows
as a sign of solidarity with that brave shoe thrower.

This was my first thought too. I could not figure out why he was the only one throwing shoes..

"but why the dozens of other shoes in the room remained on people's feet,"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. And I thought that all you could write was serious stuff. Excellent commentary, David.
My shoe's off to you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. That is a very strange "take" on the OP. You make the article sound frivolous,
when its import could scarcely be more serious. You need to understand that humour is not necessarily frivolous and shallow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. If you fail to see the humor in this article you must be reading with your eyes closed, KCabot.
Of course it's a serious topic, but it's laced throughout with humor, irony and sarcasm that give it even more ummpphhh.

And it's certainly not David's usual facts and more facts and even more facts with very rare traces of humor. That's what caught my eye.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Sorry. I'm getting very dense. Somehow I contrived to misunderstand
a satirical post about Hillary being appointed as a mere Secretary a few weeks ago!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sylvian Beehive Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Throwing Bushes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's so funny! Welcome to DU.
If this is a youtube video please post it in the video forum. There's quite a collection growing there and this would be a great addition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caraher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. That might be the kernel of a fitting farewell...
I'm not going to make it to the inauguration, but perhaps I should round up shoes and dump them at the White House when I'm out that way over Christmas. Imagine thousands of shoes serving as our collective farewell to *

We may not be throwing them at him, but the message would be clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puebloknot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Somebody could get rich with a computer game called ...
"Throw the Shoe at the Prez." (Somebody's probably cranking out the code as we speak.)

Kidding aside, that journalist deserves worldwide acclaim. I hope they don't haul him off to Gitmo, and if they do, Obama will be obligated to spring him, if he believes in freedom of expression.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC