Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats Readying Legislation in Case Treasury Asks for More TARP Funds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 09:56 AM
Original message
Democrats Readying Legislation in Case Treasury Asks for More TARP Funds
Democrats Readying Legislation in Case Treasury Asks for More TARP Funds
By Benton Ives, CQ Staff


House leaders are readying legislation to strengthen foreclosure prevention language in the $700 billion financial bailout law if the Bush administration asks for the second half of the money.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Monday she has directed House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank , D-Mass., to write a bill that would enforce language in the bailout law intended to keep people in their homes.

If the administration petitions Congress for the remaining $350 billion of the bailout money, Pelosi wants to “have legislation that insists that the provisions of the law be honored before we release any more funds.” Under the bailout law — dubbed the Troubled Asset Relief Program — Congress has the ability to block the second bailout allotment if the Treasury Department asks for it.

Pelosi, D-Calif., did not say whether Congress would pursue similar legislative changes to the bailout (PL 110-343) under an Obama administration.

Given widespread congressional opposition to the way the bailout is being run — particularly after Treasury abandoned plans to purchase souring assets in favor of direct capital infusions to banks — making changes to the law might be the only way the department can access the remaining funds.

more...

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docid=news-000002997954
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nykym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. She really needs to
override the provision *ush insisted on concerning use of the funds for exec bonuses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC