Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When you think about it, “It’s a Wonderful Life” is the ultimate pro-New Deal film

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:39 AM
Original message
When you think about it, “It’s a Wonderful Life” is the ultimate pro-New Deal film
(I was originally going to post this as a response to another thread, but since my reply is so involved, I figure I ought to give it a thread of its own.)

A lot of people here don't like It's a Wonderful Life because of its religious overtones and its "Norman Rockwell" small town atmosphere (that doesn't include minorities too much, I may add).

However, when you dig into the story, you'll see a lot of subtle messages that resonate with New Deal policies of the time. The theme of the whole film is, "If everybody sticks together and helps each other out, we'll make it through." The main character, George Bailey, spends his whole life sacrificing for others, and at the end we find he's instilled this attitude in nearly everyone in the town, and they come together to help him out in his time of need.

Contrast that with Potter, the villain, who is the embodiment of selfishness and greed. It's no accident that Potter is cast as an old man, for he symbolizes a bygone era (Hoover). In the scene where Bedford Falls has been taken over by Potter and re-named "Potterville," we see the results of "every man for himself": massive corruption, widespread unemployment, vice, and civil unrest. It's a world where George's wife becomes a spinster librarian; pure, yes, but very unhappy.

The scene that I think shows these themes most vividly is during the run on George's building & loan. (Doesn’t some of this seem eerily familiar to what’s happening these days?) Notice that (except maybe for Tom) George inspires this “stick-together” attitude in the crowd, and also how much George trusts his customers.




GEORGE: Why didn't you call me?

UNCLE BILLY: I just did, but they said you left. This is a pickle, George, this is a pickle.

GEORGE: All right now, what happened? How did it start?

UNCLE BILLY: How does anything like this ever start? All I know is the bank called our loan.

GEORGE: When?

UNCLE BILLY: About an hour ago. I had to hand over all our cash.

GEORGE: All of it?

UNCLE BILLY: Every cent of it, and it still was less than we owe.

GEORGE: Holy mackerel!

UNCLE BILLY: And then I got scared, George, and closed the doors. I . . . I . . . I . . .

GEORGE: The whole town's gone crazy.

The telephone rings. Uncle Billy picks it up.

UNCLE BILLY: Yes, hello? George . . . it's Potter.

GEORGE: Hello?

POTTER: George, there is a rumor around town that you've closed your doors. Is that true? Oh, well, I'm very glad to hear that . . . George, are you all right? Do you need any police?

GEORGE (on phone): Police? What for?

POTTER: Well, mobs get pretty ugly sometimes, you know. George, I'm going all out to help in this crisis. I've just guaranteed the bank sufficient funds to meet their needs. They'll close up for a week, and then reopen.

GEORGE (to Uncle Billy): He just took over the bank.

POTTER: I may lose a fortune, but I'm willing to guarantee your people too. Just tell them to bring
their shares over here and I will pay them fifty cents on the dollar.

GEORGE (furiously): Aw, you never miss a trick, do you, Potter? Well, you're going to miss this one.

George bangs the receiver down and turns to meet Uncle Billy's anxious look.

POTTER: If you close your doors before six P.M. you will never reopen.

He realizes George has hung up, and clicks the phone furiously.

An ominous SOUND of angry voices comes from the other room. George and Uncle Billy exit from George's office. More people have crowded around the counter. Their muttering stops and they stand silent and grim. There is panic in their faces.

GEORGE: Now, just remember that this thing isn't as black as it appears. I have some news for you, folks. I've just talked to old man Potter, and he's guaranteed cash payments at the bank. The bank's going to reopen next week.

ED: But, George, I got my money here.

CHARLIE: Did he guarantee this place?

GEORGE: Well, no, Charlie. I didn't even ask him. We don't need Potter over here.

CHARLIE: I'll take mine now.

GEORGE: No, but you . . . you . . . you're thinking of this place all wrong. As if I had the money
back in a safe. The money's not here. Your money's in Joe's house . . .
(to one of the men) . . . right next to yours. And in the Kennedy house, and Mrs. Macklin's house, and a hundred others. Why, you're lending them the money to build, and then, they're
going to pay it back to you as best they can. Now what are you going to do? Foreclose on them?

TOM: I got two hundred and forty-two dollars in here, and two hundred and forty-two dollars isn't
going to break anybody.

GEORGE (handing him a slip): Okay, Tom. All right. Here you are. You sign this. You'll get your money in sixty days.

TOM: Sixty days?

GEORGE: Well, now that's what you agreed to when you bought your shares.

There is a commotion at the outer doors. A man (Randall) comes in and makes his way up to Tom.

RANDALL: Tom . . . Tom, did you get your money?

TOM: No.

RANDALL: Well, I did. Old man Potter'll pay fifty cents on the dollar for every share you got.
(shows bills)

CROWD (ad lib): Fifty cents on the dollar!

RANDALL: Yes, cash!

TOM (to George): Well, what do you say?

GEORGE: Now, Tom, you have to stick to your original agreement. Now give us sixty days on this.

TOM (turning to Randall): Okay, Randall.

He starts out.

MRS. THOMPSON: Are you going to go to Potter's?

TOM: Better to get half than nothing.

GEORGE: Tom! Tom! Randall! Now wait . . . now listen . . . now listen to me. I beg of you not to do this thing. If Potter gets hold of this Building and Loan there'll never be another decent house built in this town. He's already got charge of the bank. He's got the bus line. He's got the department stores. And now he's after us. Why? Well, it's very simple. Because we're cutting in on his business, that's why. And because he wants to keep you living in his slums and paying the kind of rent he decides. Joe, you lived in one of his houses, didn't you? Well, have you forgotten? Have you forgotten what he charged you for that broken-down shack? (to Ed) Here, Ed. You know, you remember last year when things weren't going so well, and you couldn't make your payments. You didn't lose your house, did you? Do you think Potter would have let you keep it? (turns to address the room again) Can't you understand what's happening here? Don't you see what's happening? Potter isn't selling. Potter's buying! And why? Because we're panicky and he's not. That's why. He's picking up some bargains. Now, we can get through this thing all right. We've got to stick together, though. We've got to have faith in each other.

MRS. THOMPSON: But my husband hasn't worked in over a year, and I need money.

WOMAN: How am I going to live until the bank opens?

MAN: I got doctor bills to pay.

MAN: I need cash.

MAN: Can't feed my kids on faith.

During this scene Mary has come up behind the counter. Suddenly, as the people once more start moving toward the door, she holds up a roll of bills and calls out:

MARY: How much do you need?

George jumps over the counter and takes the money from Mary.

GEORGE: Hey! I got two thousand dollars! Here's two thousand dollars. This'll tide us over until the bank reopen. (to Tom) All right, Tom, how much do you need?

TOM (doggedly): Two hundred and forty-two dollars!

GEORGE (pleading): Aw, Tom, just enough to tide you over till the bank reopens.

TOM: I'll take two hundred and forty-two dollars.

George starts rapidly to count out the money. Tom throws his passbook on the counter.

GEORGE: There you are.

TOM: That'll close my account.

GEORGE: Your account's still here. That's a loan.

Mary turns and slips out through the crowd, followed by Ernie. George hands the two hundred and forty-two dollars to Tom, and speaks to Ed, the next in line.

GEORGE (cont'd): Okay. All right, Ed?

ED: I got three hundred dollars here, George.

Uncle Billy takes out his wallet and takes out all the cash he's got.

GEORGE: Aw, now, Ed . . . what'll it take till the bank reopens? What do you need?

ED: Well, I suppose twenty dollars.

GEORGE: Twenty dollars. Now you're talking. Fine. Thanks, Ed.
(to Mrs. Thompson, next in line) All right, now, Mrs. Thompson. How much do you want?

MRS. THOMPSON: But it's your own money, George.

GEORGE: Never mind about that. How much do you want?

MRS. THOMPSON: I can get along with twenty, all right.

GEORGE (counting it out): Twenty dollars.

MRS. THOMPSON: And I'll sign a paper.

GEORGE: You don't have to sign anything. I know you'll pay it back when you can. That's okay.
(to woman next in line) All right, Mrs. Davis.

MRS. DAVIS: Could I have seventeen-fifty?

GEORGE: Seven . . . (he kisses her) Bless your heart, Of course you can have it. You got fifty cents? (counting) Seven . . .



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. reminds me of repukes versus dems every year it becomes more stark
that even the idiots on the other side might recognize themselves in Potter - this is the crap that is happening with the banks and the autos - the workers are getting a loan but being told to break the union - the banks are getting the money (potters banks)while Bailey banks fail or auto industry fails or anything worker related fails
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I was going to say...
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 11:38 AM by Wednesdays
I can't remember specific scenes, but I recall the Marlo Thomas version ("It Happened One Christmas") has an even less kind portrayal of Potter (played by Orson Wells), and that the political implications were a lot more pronounced. I do remember that in the Potterville scene, they showed Uncle Billy as a pitiful homeless wino.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. My mouth's bleeding, Bert! My mouth's bleeding!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chucktaylor Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hey, look mister, we serve hard drinks in here for men who want to get drunk fast.
And we don't need any characters around to give the joint atmosphere.
Is that clear? Or do I have to slip you my left for a convincer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's a Wonderful Life is probably my all time favorite movie & I'm agnostic.
I don't think you need to be religious to get the message that having integrity and ethics are the key in this life we all live. The other important lesson is that whatever we do has a ripple effect on other people, even if we don't realize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. An analysis of it I'd read...
An analysis of it I'd read in a film theory textbook (Movies & Methods by Bill Nichols) regarded It's A Wonderful Life (and all of Capra's films) as classic, mid-twentieth century Populism...

Dismissive attitudes of big business and subsidized arts, neighborly rather than government assistance, the fantasy of small town goodwill, disregard of big city morals, heroes who are strong anti-materialists but even stronger pro-capitalists.

A very good read if it ever strikes you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I don't think the movie reviewer
was correct when he said the heroes are strong anti-materialists but even stronger pro-capitalists.

I think those labels are misleading and don't really mean anything.

The hero makes loans to people so that they can buy their own homes and start their own businesses. You can argue that owning your home or business is materialistic.

The point is that if the hero had not made those loans then one man would have controlled everything in the town. The loans made it possible for people at the bottom to move up to the middle class and thus have more power over their lives.

Grover Norquist and Dick Cheney are Potter. George W Bush is the son of Potter.

The people in the middle class are Democrats. Unfortunately, Reagan was able to convince a lot of those Democrats that the people who helped get them into the middle class were "the problem." And that the middle class would be better off if they paid lower taxes and their banks and employers had no regulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Not a review or reviewer
Nichols wasn't a reviewer, he writes about film theory and film analysis-- how films may or may not depict the larger and ongoing social, economic and political struggles of the times in which they are made. Very, very detailed analysis of Capra's characters, settings, struggles, etc.

Bill Nichols is a professor of cinema and director of the graduate program in cinema studies at SF State University.

Another wonderful book he wrote is, 'Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary', a wonderful and thoughtful analysis of how and why one's political ideologies and agendas can distort/become apparent in contemporary, post-1980 documentary features

Really, really thought provoking stuff regardless of whether one agrees with his premise or not. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I se it as Liberal (George Bailey) vs. Conservative (Potter) and shows predictable results of each.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. This was good to read.
Thanks for the thread, Wednesdays.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. YW!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's my favorite movie
I've probably seen it thirty times. The little girl that played "Zuzu" lives in the next town over, believe it or not.

Potter looks just like Dick Cheney.

There is a sign on the wall of the fictitious Bailey Savings & Loan that reads (paraphrased,) "All you can take with you is that you've given away".

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. I watch it every year.
And no matter how many times I see it, I always tear up at the end! :cry:

"No man is a failure who has friends."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Great film and source of epidemic ignorance of our understanding of
how our economy and monetary system work.

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danascot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. I don't know if your post or the other DU post
you mention were spurred by the piece in the NY Times today on "It's a Wonderful Life", but in case you missed it, I thought you and the other folks on this thread might be interested. Like this thread, it has some interesting comments on the movie that hadn't occurred to me before:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/19/movies/19wond.html?em

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Thanks for the link
No, I hadn't read the NYT review until now.

Wow, he's quite the cynic. A couple of things: he mentions that George Bailey (even after his visit in the alternate universe) would still have been subject to prosecution. That's true, and in fact he's quite aware of it and takes it in stride:

SHERIFF (reaching into pocket): George, I've got a little paper here.

GEORGE (happily): I'll bet it's a warrant for my arrest. Isn't it wonderful? Merry Christmas!

Furthermore, notice that at the very end the sheriff tears up the arrest warrant and drops it in the basket with the other donations...as though he's somehow aware of George's innocence (could it be the bank examiner seeing $8000 suddenly appearing in Potter's account made him go "hmmmmmm..."?).

Also, the reviewer writes about how much more "fun" Potterville would be compared to the "real" Bedford Falls. What's missing is historical context: much of today's "fun" was considered "decadence" in 1946, and focusing on what activity is going on as opposed to the mood of the people, misses the whole point. Bottom line: the people there were miserable. That scene reminds me of the one where Biff Tannen took over the world in "Back to the Future 2"...sure, there's a whole lot of excitement going on in that scene, but is that really the kind of excitement people want? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Sure, a casino & prostitution economy would be "better" than
what we have now. Uh-huh.

Sure, drinking, drugging & raising hell is "fun". When you're 19, maybe. When you're 35 with kids, not so much.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. Thank you for this Wednesdays. Idve not seen that film, unfortunately,
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 08:28 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
but it is strange that you should have pointed me to this thread of yours so soon after I had read an article in Common Dreams on Madoff's Ponzi scheme, linked below. I think the two concluding paragraphs are particularly interesting:

"The anthropologist Lionel Tiger writes in Forbes about how incidents like this undermine all respect for the business world: "The invisible hand lurches between clenched fist and begging palm, and the new Greenwich Mean Time is in Connecticut. Suddenly, the only thing taken for granted is a government grant."

You could never make this up even though Wall Street history is replete with earlier versions of this Sultan of Sleaze. Around the world, it is not just the supercrook Bernie Madoff who is seen as the guilty party but the whole American system of free market finance. There will be a reckoning."

(..... Love that last, brief sentence!)

Here's the link:
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2008/12/19-0

PS: Thinking about how he "made off" with all those ill-gotten gains, I was reminded of the name Private Eye, a British satirical magazine, gave to a fictitious legal firm it often referred to: "Sue, Grabbit and Run".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC