Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UAW to ask Obama to remove 'unfair' labor rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:52 PM
Original message
UAW to ask Obama to remove 'unfair' labor rules
The UAW today said it is pleased that the Bush administration approved bridge loans to prop up General Motors Corp. and Chrysler during the economic downturn but is concerned that the restructuring conditions outlined in the terms of the loan unfairly single out hourly workers, and said it will work with the Obama administration to remove conditions it views as unfair.

"All stakeholders – management, directors, bondholders, suppliers, dealers, workers – will have to participate in shared sacrifices to help the industry move forward," UAW President Ron Gettelfinger said in a statement, noting that UAW members have already made substantial sacrifices to help make the domestic auto
companies more competitive.


“We are disappointed that," President Bush, "has added unfair conditions singling out workers," Gettelfinger said. “We will work with the Obama administration and the new Congress to ensure that these unfair conditions are removed, as we join in the coming months with all stakeholders to create a viable
future for the U.S. auto industry."


As part of the conditions of as much as $17.4 billion in federal loans approved for GM and Chrysler, the White House has called for the automakers to make one-half of the approximately $21 billion owed to a UAW retiree health-care trust in stock instead of cash; eliminate the controversial jobs bank program that provides nearly full pay to union workers on long-term layoff; make wages competitive with those of foreign automakers operating in the United States by the end of 2009; and establish work rules that are competitive with those so-called "transplant" automakers by the end of 2009.


http://www.freep.com/article/20081219/BUSINESS01/81219062
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sandyj999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. And Two weeks ao he said they were willing to do whatever necessary.
How soon he forgot. I definitely think they should give up the "jobs bank".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think you should give up Union busting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Stop union busting.
Screw the right wing of this party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. After all that labor did to get hm elected, Obama should do something
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 04:25 PM by BrklynLiberal
to help these guys out.
The repukes are using this as an excuse to further their union busting agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The jobs bank should be tossed out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The job bank is
chump change,I doubt the union would fight for it.The problem is when you figure retiree's into the equation,workers will have to work for 9 bucks an hour to even the cost out.How much longer has GM been in business than the Japanese?It won't work out.
The job bank isn't a sticking point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Rethug Union busters should be thrown out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC