Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Discussions on DU regarding Warren - my take

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ravencalling Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:56 PM
Original message
Discussions on DU regarding Warren - my take
I am in total agreement with the anger regarding Warren from not just one perspective but two. The first has to do with the inclusion of Warren because of his views, but the second and more important is the legitimization of religious dogma that purely from it's own beliefs seeks to remove basic human rights from a group of people, whether this is the gay community or women or people who's religious views do not agree with the dogma in question.

I've had enough of the rabid family values evangelists having any hand in the shaping of our country's policies. As an agnostic, it riles me that we would choose to include the greatest of all evils, or that we even are forced to choose at all.

There is no benefit in allowing a voice at the national table to those who would destroy this country's values, science and any chance at winning our seat at the world table of enlightenment, if there is such a thing.

Bottom line. The views are not legitimate. Period. If I am involved in a religion whose belief system states that another human being is less worthy of rights then I am, and I claim my belief system to include an all powerful, perfect, infinite God, immediately my views become logically, scientifically and religiously invalid.

ANY concept of an infinite GOD that then goes on to direct man in a less then perfect way is no longer perfect. It then is nothing more then the imperfect mental construct of man the animal that can be explained at a baser level if one reviews the societal behaviors of our cousin primates. Granted, it is on a smaller scale, but it is always about power seeking to keep power by ensuring others have less power.

To those who do believe in GOD and wish to validate their faith, this is not the way to do it. Doing so makes it s clan belief, for your own clan. And if the objective does not lead to enlightenment for all then it's objective has more in common with the objective of war in the name of keeping your own clan powerful. To that end, it does not have any right to call itself spiritual in any way and by believing in clan dogma, neither do those who accept it.

Any prayer to GOD that has as it's basis the wish of one group of people to have power and more rights then another group of people, is an insult to the very concept of GOD and should be looked upon as blasphemy in that it demeans the very concept.









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. enough of the rabid family values evangelists
having any hand in the shaping of our country's policies

No arguement here - a great many of them are more like a "Freak Show" for Jerry Springer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are you a theological student? Or Philosophy?
My take, if God Created man in His image and breathed life into Adam and created Eve, then all creation is of God and in the image of perfection... along with all God's creations. It actually goes further and makes it our job to be good sterwards of the Earth He gave and to show infinite love to our brother's and sister's among us no matter what because they are perfectly created the way He intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ravencalling Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No - but..
I really enjoyed my philosophy and ethics courses in college! These arguments are classical.

From a logic standpoint you are correct. It is one of the reasons I consider myself to be agnostic. Classical arguments regarding the existence of God include some very hard thinking. The hard thinking stops though when you try to apply the same to biblical stories and their interpretation. Here you enter the realm of so called faith. But few realize that what they are believing ultimately invalidates their core belief.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. But you left out Adam's first wife Lillith, who created her?
And why? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grey Donating Member (933 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Perfectly said, Thanks.
I wish others had your grasp of logic. I'm printing this off for some 'friends'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Agreed. I never understood his decree that
whatever you "are" is what you should stay as, because that's the way you are "wired". Wonder how his ideas apply to prositutes and murderers?

Sorry, just don't feel that he's as special as he thinks he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Obama should have picked you instead of Warren.
Great OP...my pleasure to K&R!

Thank you...:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ravencalling Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thank you!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC