Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McDonald's goes after Oxford dictionary for 'McJobs'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:00 PM
Original message
McDonald's goes after Oxford dictionary for 'McJobs'
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070321/ap_on_fe_st/mcdonald_s_mcjobs


McDonald's seeks to redefine 'McJobs'

...CHICAGO - McDonald's Corp. is reviving its campaign to ditch the dictionary definition of "McJob," this time setting its sites on the vocabulary of Britons. The world's largest fast food company said Tuesday it plans to launch a campaign in the U.K. this spring to get the country's dictionary houses to change current references to the word "McJob."

The Oxford English Dictionary, considered by many wordsmiths as the gold standard for the English language, is one of those that will be targeted. It defines the noun as "an unstimulating, low-paid job with few prospects, esp. one created by the expansion of the service sector."

The word first cropped up two decades ago in the Washington Post, according to the dictionary. But executives at Oak Brook, Ill.-based McDonald's say the definition is demeaning to its workers and say theyll ask dictionary editors to amend the definition.

"Dictionaries are supposed to be paragons of accuracy. And in this case, they got it completely wrong," said Walt Riker, a McDonald's spokesman. "It's a complete disservice and incredibly demeaning to a terrific work force and a company that's been a jobs and opportunity machine for 50 years."...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. ...said the McDonald's spokesman.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sabriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. ...who was unavailable for further comment, having quit after three weeks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Not the spokesman. That person gets paid tooo..tooooo much money.
Edited on Wed Mar-21-07 10:10 PM by izzybeans
Now the Fry Guy and the Hamburgler well they are working class icons built on a tragic foundation. They get quit every three weeks, but someone else fits the suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. How about McMansions?
or McPresident?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good luck with that shit!! I'd say the dictionary had it precisely right NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. that's pretty stupid, since dictionaries record meanings, they don't determine them
The OED collects words to reflect usage, past and present ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. mcdonalds should mcfuck off. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
connecticut yankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. couldn't say it better myself
:applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Whenever a company says they "create jobs and opportunities"...
...I start looking for the thumbscrews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Apparently truth ouches n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. They prefer the McTruth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scooter24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wasn't aware that McDonald's had the monopoly
on everything Mc-

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. They shouldn't get their McPants in a McBunch, it's just a McWord.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. McMakes them look McStupid
I sincerely doubt that there are many people choosing to flip burgers as a life-time career.

It is exactly what it is, a low-paid entry-level service industry job that has a limited upside. It is the very definition of 'McJob'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Willinois Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. McNewspeak
Edited on Wed Mar-21-07 11:06 PM by Willinois
From <http://www.thereisaway.us/>

The novel 1984 describes Newspeak as "the only language in the world whose vocabulary gets smaller every year."

"The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible. It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought—that is, a thought diverging from the principles of Ingsoc—should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words."

Remember that 1984 was meant to apply to any totalitarian government at any time in any place. Where are the forces of control and repression in today's society?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Mc Donald's is the strongest force of control and repression?
Hmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Willinois Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. When the President has handed the government over to corporations
and operates it for their benefit, how do you draw a firm line between repression by corporations and the government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. AH, Ok
.,.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. McJob was wonderful experience for my fifteen year-old
who decided she really needed to work, against my better judgment. She is in college now, determined that a McJob is not what she wants in her future. She watched the illegals working in the kitchen where the air-conditioners did not work for over a year. She watched a fellow employee get fired because she went over management's head and complained to the owners. She saw so much and she learned so much. But at what price? It's a great lesson and great wages for a fifteen year-old, but she realized that this was not a good place for an adult. She learned that it was hell for an adult. She was one of the pretty "youngsters" at the cash register.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC