Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Abortion, ultrasound, South Carolina...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:29 PM
Original message
Abortion, ultrasound, South Carolina...
I live on the coast of South Carolina (10 minutes from Charleston, for those of you familiar with the area) and I love this place. I love the history of the city, the architecture of the old parts of town, the great restaurants and local seafood, and most of all the beautiful beaches and wildlife that bring me so much pleasure.

But sometimes I am embarrassed to be from South Carolina. It's embarrassing being from one of the reddest of the red states. It's embarrassing listening to some of our politicians -- local, state and federal. I wonder sometimes if these people are even from the same planet on which I currently reside.

They're embarrassing. They ruin this state, a state filled with many decent people and wonderful attributes that I believe give us great potential. Some of our license plates bear the slogan "Smiling Places, Beautiful Places," and for the most part we live up to that.

So...it's not the state. It's the people. Some of the people.

Like the people in our state legislature who want women to view an ultrasound of their fetus before undergoing an abortion. There's no medical reason for this. It is purely a bullying tactic by which some people want to impose their alleged morality upon others.

If it becomes law, we will be the only state in the country with such a law.

We the people have some power. Not much, but some. More in numbers, but part of the problem is that being a progressive in South Carolina is akin to being a fly in a frog pond.

I wish there was something we could do. I wish there was some way we could take this state back from those whose thoughts are guided by fanatic, puritanical religious extremism.

If you're from South Carolina, please, please don't let these people continue to take us down the road. They may outnumber us, but that can change. They may hold the power at the moment, but that can change. We have the same rights they do to own this state. With rights come responsibility, but they choose to recognize only the former. Let's use both and bring this state in line with progressive values that improve the lives of everyone, and discard the extremist values that serve only to keep some people down.

I feel bad for my state tonight. Tomorrow, the fight goes on.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great now SC is going to become another battleground for hippies and fundies
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Whatever that means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who TF is going to pay for a medically unnecessary ultrasound
is one question that springs to mind.


There are so many questions, but this one jumps to mind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I wondered that as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That will become futher " persuasion"
Edited on Wed Mar-21-07 10:41 PM by azurnoir
If the woman decides to go through with the abortion the price of ultrasound is tacked on to the cost of the abortion payable upfront of course, if she decides against abortion it becomes the one that is usually done on the first OB appointment, payable by insurance or Medicaid. If she is undecided then thy the bill until.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. keep trying to emember the good things, the bad will get to you if you don't.
Lived in Beaufort a couple of years and I so understand what your saying. People do realize the state has many fine people living there. But we were happy to leave. (military orders took us there)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. They might use this tact for obtaining birth control also
They will show a woman of child rearing age a video on a life that could have possibly been but she denied a chance. Theocracy pure and simple. Control women, keep them barefoot and pregnant.

Deny them an education, that will keep them more beholden to men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Straight from the Dark Ages, but I fear other Southern states may try to emulate SC
if they pass this insane bill.

What about the fathers of the babies, should they be forced to watch a castration film?
I don't know if that really equates, but this is sexist at best.

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Fathers? Well, the South isn't concerned with their morality
or education. We got to control those loose women!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Fathers have no say in it, at least they realize that

I say that as I'm sure there are some of the neanderthals that would say they should have some input.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. I live here in Mississippi. I believe that's a very valid fear.
If anything, Mississippi and South Carolina seem to be in a competition to be the reddest of the red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
37. I think that Mississippi has already passed the bill for sonograms this year.
Also requires the mother hearing the heartbeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Craftergrl Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't see a problem..
It was all over the local radio this evening and a lot of libs were calling in to support this. As a matter of fact no one said anything negative about it that I heard. Well, if you don't count the guy that said that the father had to come to and he should be forced to sign an agreement to take care of the child for the next 18 years...I thought that was an interesting point.

There's nothing wrong with showing a woman the ultrasound and letting her make a choice. All the cards on the table.

I think it's extremist to fight against letting a woman be fully informed before making her choice.

There really is a difference with being pro choice and arguing to abort every child that's conceived which is where you seem to be.

The party platform is Pro Choice. Again there's nothing wrong with a woman choosing NOT to abort. It's having the choice that's the concern.

You seem like a used car sales man that's upset that a customer walked off the car lot. You had an abortion in the can, then someone showed the mother something that changed her mind, now you don't get to score one.

Ok after thinking it through, you're just plain morbid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. You don't think a woman knows about a fetus?
How dumb do you assume women are that they need these pics shoved in their face? How insensitive do you think they are?

I won't be spending my money in South Carolina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WernhamHogg Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Oh, you know how most of us are...
We don't wanna look fat come swimsuit time, we have an abortion quota to meet and we have all that extra time to waste between our hair and our nail appointments!

:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Agree wholeheartedly
Crafter seems to think termination is a form of birth control. The ONLY person I have ever known that treated termination that way was my sister & she's a chucklenuts loving, death penalty cheering, drudge reading, wilfully ignorant RW freak. Every other woman I have ever known who exercised her choice & choose termination came to that decision w/ sleepless nights, weighing options, taking a long hard look @ that significant other, figuring what having a child would cost them in time off, who would care for the child while at work and on and on.....Then on top of all that to get an ultrasound shoved in your face. No thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. What the hell is this?
There's nothing in my post that would lead a rational person to conclude anything you concluded. I'm not even going to respond to this. Being called a "freeper" by someone else for posting what I posted is beyond reason, but your post is just not even worthy of analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
27. Your profile says you're female.
But your message indicates you know nothing about women.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
30. Lets break it down shall we
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 09:32 AM by wuushew
Advertising like propaganda is a means to influence human behavior. Abortion is a medical procedure, so to prevent hypocrisy why don't we MANDATE video of colon, heart or stomach surgery?

Why would any medical professional want to remove him or herself from the platform of impartiality? An ultrasound is not going to give the women any relevant medical information that she can digest, it is designed to stimulate a maternal emotional response. This is not to be unexpected all mammals are hardwired to to develop imprinting responses as a device to perpetuate the species.

The foes of abortion are using all means available to them to seek THEIR goal of reaching zero legal abortions as soon as possible. In doing so they are being the consummate antithesis of libertarian thought by both having opinions of others actions and seeking to influence that same group.

Even Hillary is being a bitch by publicly saying abortions inherently negative. Ideas and morality cannot and should not be projected on to other groups, we can only judge ourselves. If more information is necessary a women seeking an abortion could always ask a physician what her choices were. The state need not interfere.

Morality and freedom are individual concepts, we can only have shared ideas not coerced ones in an open and healthy society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
33. If you agree with this disgusting and infantalizing proposed law
you're the extremist. Of course there's nothing wrong with a woman choosing not to abort, but by the time she's made an appointment to have an abortion, she's already decided. There are enough legal hoops to jump through already, including the one that the woman must be informed about fetal development and must wait after that information is imparted, to have an abortion. And what if the woman is the victim of rape or incest? It's particularly cruel in that instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
34. My biggest concern is that it would make abortions unaffordable
as ultrasounds are very expensive.

But it's also entirely unnecessary. No pregnant woman doesn't know that there's a fetus. It isn't informing her of the presence of a fetus. What information is she getting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #34
41. I believe that is one of the goals
To put abortion out of the reach of all but the wealthiest women, who would be get one in any case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
40. self delete -- unintentional troll feeding.
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 11:00 PM by Rosemary2205
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
42. Oh give me a freakin' break!!!!
Do you really think women are that stupid??

:eyes: :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. This ties in with the program the Southern Baptists have to buy ultrasound
machines. Buncha crotch-sniffing anal-retentive Barney Fifes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. Me thinks I smell a freeper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Hey southerncrone!
11:00pm or so seems to be their swarming time. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Apparently....
Now we're on Daylight Savings Time, they have to wait later for it to get GOOD & DARK! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Pathetic response.
I've been posting here for several years and have been a donor for one of those, which just ended about a month ago. When I'm able to come up with some extra cash, I will be again.

You have no reason to attack me on this issue. I find it abhorrent that women in my state may be subjected to this. And your baseless attack won't stop me from speaking out against the legislature's effort to make psychological war on my sisters and other women in my state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. I don't think that was directed at you.
I think this was a shared joke about someone else's response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. If so, please accept my apology.
The placement of that response was directly under my post. Maybe I just need another cup of coffee...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
43. It wasn't directed at you
At least I don't think so any way. There is a freeperish post upthread that a lot of people have responded to. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corgigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
24. You're a better person then me
I live in Summerville, you know where that is and I hate this place. If it wasn't so cheap to live here I would be gone. I'm waiting for the kids to get out of school (4 Years) and then Hubby and I are moving out of this place. I'm taking my kids with me, especially my two daughters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. I'm not big on Summerville, either. :)
j/k

Living about 2 miles from the beach is great. Being so close to downtown Charleston is great. I love this area. I think many people in the state, however, are the problem, not the state itself. And I guess some of the more "upstate" folks are what I have in mind.

Good luck to you. I wish you'd stay and join the fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_eh_N_eh_D_eh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
26. How effective would this be?
Perhaps I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that most abortions are performed at a stage when the fetus is barely big enough to even see on a sonogram, much less look anything like a fully developed baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. The law is designed to bankrupt abortion providers.
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 09:10 AM by Breeze54
Bill after bill is being introduced.

Check the link.

South Carolina - Anti-Choice Legislation

http://www.naral.org/choice-action-center/in_your_state/bill-tracker/state.html?state=SC

Bill Number: SC S 84
Summary: Requires abortion providers obtain costly ultrasound equipment, even if not medically necessary for patient care.
Sponsor: Bryant (R)
Introduced: 01/09/2007
Last Action: Introduced
Biased Counseling and Mandatory Delay


Bill Number: SC H 3697
Summary: Is intended to impose near-total ban on abortion. Defines personhood as beginning at fertilization, which could lead to prohibitions on most contraceptives and fertility treatments.
Sponsor: Davenport (R)
Introduced: 03/13/2007
Last Action: Introduced

Bill Number: SC H 3355
Summary: Requires abortion providers obtain costly ultrasound equipment, even if not medically necessary for patient care.
Sponsor: Delleney (R)
Introduced: 01/25/2007
Last Action: Introduced

Bill Number: SC S 84
Summary: Requires abortion providers obtain costly ultrasound equipment, even if not medically necessary for patient care.
Sponsor: Bryant (R)
Introduced: 01/09/2007
Last Action: Introduced

http://www.scstatehouse.net/sess117_2007-2008/bills/84.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drmom Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. Does anyone know a way to contribute directly to the pro-choice groups in SC?
Or some way to get their legal team some monetary support?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Click here--->
Make a gift today to protect a woman’s right to choose

https://secure.ga3.org/02/naral8

With more than a million supporters and 26 state affiliates across the country,
NARAL Pro-Choice America is the political arm of the pro-choice movement.
We help elect pro-choice candidates, educate Congress on key issues relating
to reproductive health and privacy and promote awareness in the public about
the threat to Roe v. Wade. Political observers agree: we can turn the tide in
Washington, D.C and in the states, but your financial support is critical to our success.

Please help us hold the line for women's rights by making a gift today.

http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/about-us/learn-about-us/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
28. I'm in NC, but I love that Charleston area, too, Fight the good fight!

If we wanted a theocracy, we'd have moved to Iran or Saudi Arabia already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. NC gets a D grade
North Carolina -ANTI-CHOICE LAWS

http://www.naral.org/choice-action-center/in_your_state/who-decides/state-profiles/north-carolina.html

Physician-Only Restriction

North Carolina prohibits certain qualified health care professionals from performing abortions.
Details »
Refusal to Provide Medical Services

North Carolina allows certain individuals or entities to refuse to provide women
specific reproductive health services, information, or referrals.
Details »
Restrictions on Low-Income Women's Access to Abortion

North Carolina restricts low-income women's access to abortion.
Details »
Restrictions on Young Women's Access to Abortion

North Carolina law restricts young women's access to abortion services
by mandating parental consent.
Details »
Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP)

North Carolina subjects abortion providers to burdensome restrictions
not applied to other medical professionals.
Details »


My state isn't much better though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
29. I live in SC too. Upstate SC. I feel as disgusted about this as you do. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
35. How far down on the list is SC in the area of education? 48, 49, 50?
Don't forget to take care of the babies after they're born. Dingbats.


You might not be the only progressive in your area. Look in your phone book and see if there is a local Dem headquarters or office in your area. If there are any democratic office-holders on a local level, call them and see what can be done to get a group started and grow with it. Go straight to the top of where the action is and e-mail Howard Dean's office and ask what resources they have to help you get started (you *are* part of the 50 state strategy). Go to the SC forum and ask who is in your area, more people to help get it started. I live in a very red area and thought I had to be the only Democrat until I started getting together with others. It's such a relief to be with like-minded people and my frustration at not being able to do anything against Bush and his warmongers has turned into energy to get things done on a local level. They're out there, you just have to find each other!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
39. What? I asked a question that was rhetorical and more a statement
about the lack of attention many fundamentalist Christian right types give to children and their welfare after they're born.

When looking at a chart of states and their educational ranking southern school systems are among the worst in America, North Carolina included. I believe it serves everyone to withhold any back patting until the 'No Child Left Behind' scam is dropped and we see how many of the numbers recorded are a true representative of all the children in our school systems. Many numbers don't reflect the children who are really left behind because their grades bring down scores. Here's an article you might be interested in:
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1599099,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC