|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 12:58 PM Original message |
Why Obama Really Might Decriminalize Marijuana |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. Don't bet on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musiclawyer
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
2. If he does, his balls are bigger than I thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ContinentalOp
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 02:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. I think the best way would be to just do it. Quietly and without fanfare. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Thu Dec-25-08 02:30 AM Response to Reply #7 |
27. changing it's dea classification from schedule 1 to schedule 3 or 4 would be one way to start... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
3. That would take courage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Thu Dec-25-08 02:31 AM Response to Reply #3 |
28. it would surprise me if any move was made in that direction in his first term... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
4. He has talked about decriminalization of "soft drugs" before and has authored |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ioo
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
5. Hold your breath... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
6. President-elect Obama is not in favor of the legalization of marijuana: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 03:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. He is in favor of fixing or getting rid of mandatory minimums. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Thu Dec-25-08 02:32 AM Response to Reply #6 |
29. decriminalization is not the same as legalisation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
8. I hope you're correct, it would be a logical step back to sanity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
9. it would be a profitable move for the States and Fed Gov |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Thu Dec-25-08 02:37 AM Response to Reply #9 |
30. it's an economic double-whammy(at least)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDittoHead
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
10. It would be great if he at least turned it over to the states. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Thu Dec-25-08 02:39 AM Response to Reply #10 |
31. as broke as the states are, i'm sure that they'd LOVE the potential increase n income... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
11. Even if you decriminalize it will still have to be produced and sold underground |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chulanowa
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. And then watch as all growers and smokers are still criminals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. I really doubt they can copyright pot. As far as I know anyone can grow their own tobacco |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDittoHead
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Decriminalization means it won't be a crime, rather, like a parking ticket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Thu Dec-25-08 02:52 AM Response to Reply #16 |
34. i'd like to see them selling personal growing licenses... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDittoHead
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 05:38 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. The money spent imprisoning pot users, and the cost of their ruined lives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
17. It NEEDS to be done, too many people's lives have been ruined by the Bushbots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Thu Dec-25-08 02:47 AM Response to Reply #17 |
33. the clinton administration was pretty rough on the average user as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbc5g
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
18. It's anyones guess what Obama will do..he has yet to even pick his drug czar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDittoHead
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 06:02 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Let's hope for *NO* Drug Czar!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbc5g
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 06:08 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Biden helped create the drug czar position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RadiationTherapy
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
19. Now is the time. This will make a big difference in our economy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Thu Dec-25-08 02:46 AM Response to Reply #19 |
32. not to mention the possible benefits to ancillary industries... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lib2DaBone
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
21. Tax it and make it a profit center.... prohibition does not work... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Thu Dec-25-08 03:01 AM Response to Reply #21 |
35. alcohol prohibition and marijuana 'prohibition' are two entirely different things... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker
![]() |
Thu Dec-25-08 08:21 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. One of the reasons alcohol prohibition was ended was because more kids were drinking.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
22. During the campaign, Obama claimed he didn't know what "decriminalization" meant. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
24. In the PATRIOT act, MCA world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
25. Look up Eric Holder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423
![]() |
Tue Dec-23-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Yep! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicalboi
![]() |
Thu Dec-25-08 03:13 AM Response to Original message |
36. Obama did say a while back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Thu Dec-25-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. that is a sliver of hope... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz
![]() |
Thu Dec-25-08 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
37. I'm not optimistic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Thu Dec-25-08 12:29 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. i'll be happy if he at least makes the initial incremental steps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz
![]() |
Thu Dec-25-08 05:26 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. This drug war is so ingrained in the bureaucracy and the population at large... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Thu Dec-25-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. i don't think that the "population at large" has any particular respect for it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babydollhead
![]() |
Fri Dec-26-08 01:13 AM Response to Original message |
43. I wish it comes true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillieW
![]() |
Fri Dec-26-08 01:47 AM Response to Reply #43 |
44. We can always move to Amsterdam. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC