Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Revokes One of His Pardons! Has this ever happened before?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 06:58 PM
Original message
Bush Revokes One of His Pardons! Has this ever happened before?
Apparently Bush didn't vet this crook very well. He somehow overlooked the fact that the guy's daddy contributed a bunch of dough to the GOP and, well, that's just not seemly to then pardon him, right? Especially when Bush didn't even know the extent of the guy's criminal activity till reporters gave him a heads-up.

From the link:

CBS/ AP) President Bush took the very rare step Wednesday of revoking a pardon he had granted only a day before, after learning in news reports of political contributions to Republicans by the man's father and other information.

Mr. Bush pardoned 19 people on Tuesday, including Isaac Robert Toussie of Brooklyn, N.Y., who had been convicted of making false statements to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and of mail fraud. On Wednesday, the White House issued an extraordinary statement saying the president was reversing his decision in Toussie's case.

White House press secretary Dana Perino said the new decision was "based on information that has subsequently come to light," including on the extent and nature of Toussie's prior criminal offenses. She also said that neither the White House counsel's office nor the president had been aware of a political contribution by Toussie's father that "might create an appearance of impropriety."

More here:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/24/politics/main4685986.shtml?tag=topHome;topStories
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sniff..snifff....
Something stinks in Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think you can revoke a pardon
My guess is the guy will challenge the revocation, and it might go all the way to the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That would be interesting. Also, can they blame the guy for what his dad contributed?
Not that I think the developer deserved a pardon, but still -- once it's granted, it's granted. And it makes Bush look like he didn't take the pardon process very seriously if he failed to learn a thing or two about the guy he was pardoning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. People who get cheated in the mortgage scam were making a fuss, that may have played into the pardon
also
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. It was done by the King so it is law. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. What does he have to PROVE he was actually, officially pardoned??
It'd be very interesting if he (or his attorney) actually received paperwork to certify the pardon. I have to believe a pardon is accompanied by some kind of documentation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Well, there's this from Newsday.com (and many other sites)...
Isaac Robert Toussie, the Brooklyn developer who served time in prison for masterminding a massive Suffolk real estate scam, was pardoned Tuesday by President George W. Bush, effectively wiping his criminal record clean.

Toussie was among 19 pardons and one commutation that Bush issued Tuesday before leaving for the holidays in Camp David.
______________

I guess Bush could claim he was just joking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I'm well aware of the announcement but I'm questioning the legal paperwork.
If news stories were official then there's a "pubic inspector" in Benton County, Washington.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. There is one, and you wouldn't believe the stuff he's seen. :-0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
34. Would be nice if pardons could be revoked...
If that precedent was set, Obama could revoke the commutation of Scooter Libby's sentence...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angleae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. Depends if it had actually been processed.
If not, it could be made into a "clerical error".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. I bet they rue the days
they "contributed" to the republicon party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't think he CAN do that.
A pardon is kind of like an execution -- if done in error, it's a tragedy, but can't be undone.

Not to mention it would be a horrible precedent. If the President's pardon power is seen as extending to revocation of pardons, what's to stop Bush from revoking all of Clinton's pardons on January 19th?

I hate to say it, because this pardon was a great example of what's wrong with the system, but to undo it now would raise too many more issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. No, it has NEVER happened before.
Is it too late to start impeachment proceedings against him???

Consider this. If Bush can wait a day, what's to stop him from waiting five years? Think of the extortion tool he could hold over someone's head by this new power of revoking pardons.

What about the pardons of other Presidents? Could Barack Obama fix Bill Clinton's little Marc Rich problem? Should Scooter Libby be practicing his shackle walk?

The very notion of revocation of a pardon is ANTITHETICAL to the power itself. I'd compare it to the notion of ex post facto laws. You can decriminalize an offense done by someone, but you cannot criminalize an action by someone and then try them for it. Once given, a pardon should not be able to be revoked. Bush has jumped headlong into yet another Constitutional quagmire that is the coup de grace for his asswipe of a Presidency.

Just when I thought this muthafucka had no more ability to outrage me...

AAAHHHHHHHAAHAHAHHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. If only he'd revoke his decision to attack Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. it would seem a pardon
is equivalent to a not guilty verdict.

Once it's done, it's done, even if later evidence comes along to show it shouldn't have been.

That's why the government has the right of an interlocutory appeal that freezes the trial for a decision by an appellate court if they think the judge has made an incorrect legal ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. What a clown
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. That was my initial, and on reflection, entire reaction. Typical of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. If a oardon can be revoked, I have a whole list of pardons that should be
Namely, Bush 41's bulk pardons of the Iran-Contra players. Revoke 'em all, get 'em on the stand and let's get GHWB in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Im sure Bush got off on doing this . "Heh heh heh. Heh heh heh."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I'm betting Bush received a phonecall from a Senior Rethug
Senator. "W are you fugging crazy - how can we bring up Mark Rich during the Holder hearings if you pardon this man". This is one more clusterfuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Bingo !
:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. another gut reaction
by the decider-in chief. Guess Bush is reading newspapers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. Is there any doubt that somebody's check didn't clear?
It is astounding that Smirky's tally of incompetence continues to grow. He is truly one of America's greatest fuck-ups EVER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. your thoughts mirror mine.
the dumbbass can't even get a granting of a pardon done right. How many people voted for this asshole? What say we have a beer with him, seems like that kind of guy.:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Boy King can't even do a pardon correctly. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. Once a flip-flopper, always a flip-flopper ....






... even a lame-ass duck flip-flopper.



:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. Remember, this is the same administration that was ready to hire Bernie Kerik
You'd think that the ongoing problems this administration has in vetting its decisions might catch the attention of even one reporter in the popular media. But if you thought that, you'd be quite wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenInNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
22. Another example of on the fly decision making nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
24. Here's a discussion going that says it HAS happened before...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4714479

But the paperwork hadn't gotten to the pardoned folks' hands. So do we know if the paperwork went through on yesterday's pardons yet? Papers might move faster these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
25. Pardon me??
Only for a day. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
27. It should have happened with Marc Rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. I kinda buy into the notion that it should have been a civil case, as Clinton said.
I think he pardoned Rich because he didn't think it should have been a Federal criminal manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. I would have just passed on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillieW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
31. self deleted
Edited on Wed Dec-24-08 11:21 PM by WillieW
wrong board
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
32. Sounds to me like he's just testing the waters to see if a pardon CAN be revoked.
Obviously he and his criminal administration have a rather enormous stake in whether or not a Presidential pardon can be revoked--especially if they're afraid that Obama might do the revoking if "new evidence" comes to light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
33. From the LA Times -- an "explanation" of sorts....
Toussie did not meet Justice Department guidelines for a pardon. The original decision to pardon him had come without a recommendation from the pardon attorney, Ronald L. Rodgers, and the request for a pardon came less than five years after completion of his sentence.

Further, Toussie had taken his case directly to the Oval Office and had hired Bradford Berenson, a former top lawyer in the White House counsel's office, to handle the case.
____

All of which begs the question: So how did he get the pardon in the first place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
38. once the guy is pardoned- he's PARDONED.
is there anything in the constitution about revoking them?

but then- that kind of detail has never impeded the boy king.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC