Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Firedoglake: America’s Real Patriot Act: The Employee Free Choice Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 09:25 AM
Original message
Firedoglake: America’s Real Patriot Act: The Employee Free Choice Act

http://firedoglake.com/2008/12/25/americas-real-patriot-act-the-employee-free-choice-act/#comments

When America's founders crafted the Constitution, they knew more was needed to ensure the survival of democracy. So they created the Bill of Rights. They made sure that at the top of the list, the First Amendment included such rights as the freedom of assembly. That is, the freedom of all of us to gather together in groups of our choosing. Like, say, unions.

Some opponents of workers' freedom to form unions seem to have forgotten that forming groups outside government—and corporate—purview is critical to a free nation. In Big Brother-speak, these corporate hacks are attacking the proposed Employee Free Choice Act—which would enable more workers to have the freedom to form unions—as unconstitutional.

Here's what's really outrageous:

* Managers following employees to the bathroom and around the workplace to harass them for seeking to form a union.
* Workers so intimidated by employers, they become scared of voting in a ballot for a union so they vote against the union or don't vote at all, fearing that if they do, they'll lose their job.
* Employers spending millions of dollars to fight workers' efforts to unionize, so they won't have to provide workers with decent health care and retirement security.
* The mindset exhibited by some southern Republican senators to import the low-wages, no benefits, no genuine union representation model of China and Bangladesh to the United States, enserfing U.S. workers in a perpetual cycle of poverty.

In fact, those who assert workers have no freedom of assembly demonstrate the same un-Americanism as those who sought to make middle-class autoworkers the enemy by championing the expansion of lower-paid, minimal benefit jobs generated by foreign manufacturers.

Opponents of the Employee Free Choice Act now are trying to wrap themselves in the notion of "freedom of speech"—that is, employers' freedom of speech, not workers'. It's the same tired argument that Big Business used when lobbying for the Taft-Hartley Act. At that time, corporate interests asserted the National Labor Relations Act didn't give employers enough "free speech." So Taft-Hartley, which passed in 1947, gave employers so much freedom to counter unionization efforts that today, according to research by Cornell University professor Kate Bronfenbrenner:

* Ninety-two percent of private-sector employers, when faced with employees who want to join together in a union, force employees to attend closed-door meetings to hear anti-union propaganda; 80 percent require supervisors to attend training sessions on attacking unions; and 78 percent require that supervisors deliver anti-union messages to workers they oversee.
* Seventy-five percent hire outside consultants to run anti-union campaigns, often based on mass psychology and distorting the law.
* Half of employers threaten to shut down partially or totally if employees join together in a union.
* In 25 percent of organizing campaigns, private-sector employers illegally fire workers because they want to form a union.

So when you hear opponents of the Employee Free Choice Act sniveling about (employer) free speech, beware.

Another argument supposedly showing the Employee Free Choice Act is unconstitutional (this one is so obscure it won't be getting much steam) is it would violate the Fifth Amendment “takings” clause. The proposed Employee Free Choice Act would require binding arbitration if a contract can't be reached within a certain time. As Publius points out on Obsidian Wings:

The point of this requirement is to prevent employers from bargaining in bad faith to run out the clock (employers are free to de-recognize the union after a year.)

Bronfenbrenner's research finds that even after workers successfully form a union, employers do not negotiate a contract in one-third of the instances.

In fact, as Publius further points out, the "takings" argument was rejected in 1937 in NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

Corporations are running scared. They fear that under the Obama administration, America's workers might actually improve their chances to form unions on the job and thereby attain or maintain a middle-class standard of living. So Big Business and its minions are throwing out every possible attack against the Employee Free Choice Act, trying to see what will stick.

And showing just how un-American they are in the process.

Entire article published here with authors permission.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chemical Bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. It kills me that working people fight one another...
when corporate media tells us to. The Golden Parachutes at GM are never mentioned when talking about GM's troubles, but worker pay, health care, and pensions are all listed as the problems.

Unions are the best hope of the worker.

Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. K& R #5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Chamber of Commerce
The real enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC