Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

first drug to promote long lashes approved by FDA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 03:08 PM
Original message
first drug to promote long lashes approved by FDA
Edited on Fri Dec-26-08 03:09 PM by Liberal_in_LA
http://www.webmd.com/skin-beauty/news/20081226/fda-oks-first-eyelash-drug-latisse

FDA OKs 1st Eyelash Drug Latisse
Latisse Promotes Longer, Darker, Thicker Lashes; Glaucoma Drug Inspired It
By Miranda Hitti
WebMD Health NewsReviewed by Louise Chang, MDDec. 26, 2008 -- The FDA has approved Latisse, the first drug to promote eyelash growth, according to Allergan, the company that makes Latisse.

Latisse, which will be available by prescription starting in the first quarter of 2009, contains the active ingredient of the glaucoma drug Lumigan, which is also made by Allergan.

Eyelash growth is a known side effect of Lumigan. But Lumigan and Latisse are used differently. Lumigan is an eyedrop, and Latisse gets dabbed along the lash line on the upper eyelids to promote longer, thicker, darker lashes.

Allergan states that "Latisse users can expect to experience longer, fuller, and darker eyelashes in as little as eight weeks, with full results in 16 weeks." If Latisse is stopped, eyelashes will gradually return to their previous appearance as new eyelashes grow in.

Allergan also notes that Latisse may cause darkening of the eyelid skin, which may be reversible, and it "may also cause increased brown pigmentation of the colored part of the eye, which is likely to be permanent."

Picture that has nothing to do with article:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. A DRUG for longer, thicker, darker lashes?
Isn't that what mascara is for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. beta interferon also causes long eyelashes, IIRC. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. A tube of good mascara is like $9 and lasts for ages.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You should replace your mascara every 3 months
The bacteria from your eye will build up in the tube. After 3 months even though there's some left in the tube, you should junk it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't think I even use my mascara every three months.
I fail at makeup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. LOL! Then it's okay after 3 months I'd say
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm just worried how my eyelash growth medicine will interact with my restless leg syndrome meds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Stupid. I hate this kind of stuff.
I'm glad my company does actual biomedical research and none of this cosmetic junk.
This is what I hate about my industry..to much money spent on stupid shit like this and not enough on disease research (particularly rare or orphan diseases)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. This grew out of an existing drug for a medical condition
It just happened to have a convenient side effect for cosmetic purposes. If it does no harm, why not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. But - but - but - we need our kneejerk squick reactions! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Have we really become such a vain society that
we will take drugs to affect the size of our EYELASHES?

How sick!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Sick and Stupid!
Our society has been brainwashed into thinking that there is always a solution to any and every silly little problem and that solution is a drug! It's insulting to think Big Pharma believes we are all that desperate! But really, they came out with the notion that a woman shouldn't have to be bothered with those pesky little periods every single month, via a dangerous pill, so why not an eyelash lengthener? Hell, why not have lipstick in a drug, too? Eyeshadow? I know!!Iknow!!! Haircolor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. On the plus side, at least the drug was not imported from Singapore
Edited on Fri Dec-26-08 04:11 PM by HypnoToad


And to think of all the new businesses that would spring up!



:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. It changes your eye color?
I'd be worried it could have a side effect of doing bad things to your vision. Bad idea. A prescription drug for eyelashes? The world is a crazy place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. I can't wait to hear the TV ads...
for this shit.

"In some cases, this product may cause flaming diarrhea or blood in the urine. Tell your doctor if you lose your vision for more than 4 hours."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. Sweet Viking Jesus, FINALLY!
My ongoing nightmare of weak lashes is FINALLY OVER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ocracoker16 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. Maybe they can find better drugs for cancer
Then my mother wouldn't have to worry about her eyelashes falling out from the chemo she is on. There are lots of cheaper over the counter products that help with this problem. Insurance companies never want to pay for cosmetic treatments for obvious reasons. They also will not like the price tag and it will not end up in the list of medicines covered by their plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaJudy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. Great. Botox, and now this.
Explain to us again why we have to pay outrageous amounts for prescription drugs because you drug companies have to finance your "research". Is there no one among us who hasn't lost a loved one to the tragedy of short eyelashes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. They're both alternate uses for drugs developed for actual problems.
Botox is useful for people who have muscles that won't unclench for some reason (it's used to treat torticollis, which causes the neck to permanently turn some odd direction, by causing the muscles doing the pulling to relax) or for people with really overactive sweat glands (I know a girl in high school who had injections in her hands because they would sweat constantly.) The paralyzing muscles that cause wrinkles thing was actually an afterthought.

Same thing here. It's a glaucoma drug. The eyelash thing was a side effect so they found a way to use it primarily for that purpose. Silly, but not really a huge outlay of cash to repurpose an existing drug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Sildafenal was originally developed as a hypertension drug
As was minoxidil.

They became what they are today when it turned out they had desirable side effects.

Still, it's strange to me that someone would use a drug with potentially undesirable side effects in place of a product that works fine without side effects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaJudy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. And Viagra was originally developed as a drug for heart disease
It didn't do squat for its intended purpose, but a researcher got curious about why so many men kept asking for more pills once the research studies were finished. The rest is pharmaceutical history. Similar story with Rogaine: it's a drug used to treat high blood pressure that has the side effect of promoting hair growth.

I was being mildly sarcastic. I would be embarrassed to waste my doctor's time by asking her for a prescription for something to make my eyelashes more luxuriant, but obviously many people wouldn't be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
22. I was hoping this was about SMBD when I read the title.

but oh well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NaturalHigh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
23. Well, I'm glad we finally got that taken care of!
Honestly, how many billions were spent on this? Are eyelashes really such a pressing issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
24. You guys that are attacking this drug have no idea what you are talking about
shut the fuck up if you dont know what you are talking about, really.

In the first place, there is a medical condition, madarosis, which is loss of the eyelashes of the human eye. It is very common, especially with aging. The human eyelashes are more then just cosmetic. Without lashes, people are bothered by chronic debillitating conditions: meibomianitis, blepharitis, and the worst which is dry eye syndrome. Ask anyone with DES how much they love life. They dont.

Secondly, this drug, lumigan and the entire class it comes from were a godsend to glaucoma. Safe, hugely effective, less expensive and easy to use. You really dont know. The older drugs used to treat glaucoma caused many more problems than they solved. Serious problems too. People would not take the drops and go blind because of the side effects.

The only side effects this drug has were long lashes&change eye color. Anyone upthread who thinks it can harm hyour vision is a stupid idiot. I love it because you can just look at a person and tell 2 things: they are taking lumigan& and their pressure is under control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Thanks for the info.
Many drugs are originally intended for one purpose and the side effect is so beneficial that it also gets prescribed for that as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC