Senator's Imhofe & Stevens Square Off In A Battle Of Wits On The Senate Floor

[matcom]

who wins?

[madokie]

1. beings as both are dumb as a post neither do or both does

:shrug:

[salin]

2. Stevens... by breaking the tie by bashing Inhofe in the head with a big bridge to nowhere.

[Deb]

3. The Democrats

:hi:

[ellacott]

4. John Stewart n/t

[SoCalDem]

5. A battle of wits, between two people with only a nit between them

:rofl:

[matcom]

7. what if they battled with TUBES?

:rofl:

[MonkeyFunk]

6. Hrmm...

when an irresistible dumb meets an immovable ignorance. I think it creates a singularity of idiocy.

[underpants]

8. It's not a dumptruck

If Stevens wears his Hulk tie he wins. Apparently that is all it takes in the Senate these days.

[zbdent]

9. I was going to say "America wins if they bash each other's brains out"

but then, that action would be beating a dead horse ... and just plain redundant ...

[MaineYooper]

10. I call it a draw. Neither is armed. nt

[hatrack]

11. If they got too close together, they'd collapse into a black hole . . .

The combined powers of their ignorance and arrogance would be so strong that not even light could escape.

[Richard Steele]

12. But sadly, their IDEAS could still emerge- because they have no substance. nm

[hatrack]

13. So basically they're a couple of highly paid neutrinos?

Now that makes sense!

[MiniMe]

14. Pick'em. Its hard to have a battle with an unarmed man

[Sydnie]

15. I hate to nitpick but

doesn't anyone in this battle get to be armed? :rofl:

[11 Bravo]

16. For me, that would be akin to the Cowboys playing the Giants.

I don\'t care about the winner, I just want to see lots of injuries.

[muriel_volestrangler]

17. The floor. (n/t)

[Junkdrawer]

18. LOL

:rofl: