Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone watching the Senate regarding the vote on subpoenas?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:21 AM
Original message
Anyone watching the Senate regarding the vote on subpoenas?
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 09:49 AM by Solly Mack
and do you have a working link for viewing?


It's the Senate Judiciary Committee
http://judiciary.senate.gov/meeting_notice.cfm?id=2631



March 22, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. in the Senate Dirksen Building Room 226.

By order of the Chairman


UPDATED AGENDA
Senate Judiciary Committee
Senate Dirksen Office Building Room 226
Thursday, March 22, 2007 at 10:00 a.m.

I. Committee Authorization
Authorization of Subpoenas in Connection with Investigation into Replacement of U.S. Attorneys


The web-cast link isn't working for me.

CNN just showed a small portion of the hearing.

GO HERE:

http://www.cbsnews.com/

You'll see Live Video. Click on the Rove/Subpoena link on top

Or use C-SPAN Radio

Hopefully one or the other will work for people.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Judd Gregg (R) is talking about healthcare on cspan2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. C-Span radio
is carrying the audio

http://c-span.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thank you!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. thank you
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
92. Sessions - gag me (sorry, wrong place)
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 10:23 AM by LizW
The embarrassment of Alabama. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cspanlovr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Judiciary Comm. website doesn't have a link to see this hearing.
I wonder why? All I can get is the Copyright hearing. Damn! If you find something, let us know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. See blogslut 's post above. C-SPAN Radio is carrying the audio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. Webcast link not working. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. "Placing someone under oath connotes subservience"
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 09:51 AM by Solly Mack
"branches are co-equal" (someone needs to tell Bush that then)

Don't know who this is talking but they are FOS...I think it's John Kyl

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Where are you getting this?
I can't get it on C-Span radio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I can't either. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I'm using C-SPAN radio from the link in blogsluts' post (above)
It's working for me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Thank you!
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 09:47 AM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. See below post with link cbsnews.com
I'm watching it there now

www.cbsnews.com

then there is a link above headlines for live viewing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. OK. It was John Kyl saying that crap
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 09:50 AM by Solly Mack
and he goes on to say how it harms the ability to work to be under oath and at the whim of the Congress for staff to have to testify before Congress

Leahy brings up Cunningham, etc..and how their staff did.

edit to get the piece of shits name right...cause well..I should.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. Kyl said that crap? WTF? Someone send him to Civics 101.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
36. What a dumbass. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
48. Damn straight. Subservience to the Constitution of the U.S. and our legal system.
What a twit, trying to pervert the intent of being placed under oath. Someone smack that guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
13. Kyle taking issue with the suggestion USA were removed to prevent
investigations of certain people.

and claims you can't base a subpoena on that "kind of logic"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
14. Every US Attorney in the country is investigating some political corruption?
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 09:43 AM by Sydnie
:wtf: Did this guy really say that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yes he did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
15. cbsnews.com eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Thank you bunches!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Your welcome! I have found that CBSNews.com will often have a video
feed on important hearings, press conferences, etc. Feeds that CNN will have you pay for with Pipeline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
34. I'll hafta remember that...and will. Thanks again!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. Oh THANK YOU!
Is there something for ear popcorn?

Schumer speaking now (hope I haven't missed too much)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
22. This needs a few K/Rs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. I wish I had known about it MUCH earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Me too! I caught it after it had already started :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
24. Radio connection sucks, keep getting booted off
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. Try the cbsnews.com link - live video at the top of the page
Good Luck!!! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. I got it!! Thanks!
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 09:57 AM by 48percenter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
25. Specter trying to do a deal ... we need to flood his office
with calls and tell him to knock off the dealing. I don't negotiate with the right to know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. I agree!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. I wouldn't take any offer that Specter has worked on
Specter floated a proposal late Wednesday in which a limited number of House and Senate lawmakers would be allowed to hear from White House aides who were not under oath, and a transcript of the proceedings would be provided.

Specter said his "strong preference" was that the testimony be public. It was not clear whether other Republicans or any Democrat would back such an approach.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2776660
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #25
44. I'll get my mom to call, he's her Senator. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
29. Arlen Spectre is being a dick...
He actually went to interrupt Schumer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
30. You mean the President would purposely mislead us?
:rofl: Love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. I'm still chuckling over it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
32. ROFL! Leahy to Spector: You mean that the President would purposefully
mislead us?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
37. Ah--FINALLY I got the CBS site to work! Thank you!!
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 10:02 AM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
39. Thanks for the links everyone. You are the best! eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
40. Orrin "Uriah Heep" Hatch whining on and on and on.
The smarmy fuck! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
41. Hatch blah blahing- saying Justice has agreed to produce their people
and if you want to subpoena those that have already LEFT justice...

as they ahve already

more blah blahing about how Justice has agreed to produce its people and gee, why all this fuss about needing subpoenas


"fred fielding has made a really good offer here"




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #41
46. Thanks for letting us know
what's going on Solly Mack. It's much appreciated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. You're welcome, cali!!!
Just wish I had known sooner

Hate missing this stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
42. Orrin Hatch is a woosie. Now the cons have no backbone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
43. We need to go back and see how each of these repugs handled
all the interviews/testimony around the Clinton investigations! Check out their record and their positions and compare and contrast them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
45. Leahy speaking on how after a closed door briefing, he reads something in the press
that contradicts what he was told behind closed door

he is speaking of sunshine being the best

Hatch explaining how yes, that would be best BUT....gee...let's not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
47. Hatch desperately trying to rollover and have the WH rub his tummy
Suprise, surprise. He's just fine with any ole way the WH wants to do it.

Give that man a cigar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. LOL! Well put!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithjx Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
51. Feinstein pointing out 18-day gap!
And performance reviews were excellent. She's on it!
KJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Yep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
53. Video Link !!!! In case anyone needs the direct link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. super, thanks
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
55. Di-Fi is saying we can't get at the truth without getting on record
and under oath...that they have an obligation to do it that way...for open government
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithjx Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
56. R - Coburn
Up to President to fire anyone that works at his pleasure. Political firing does not mean unlawful or unjust.

What he's missing is that they LIED about it to Congress (it was performance issue). Asshat.
KJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #56
64. All the "important" work that they need to do related DIRECTLY to
favors for his corporate constituents... Every single one he listed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
57. What is the ratio of D's to R's on this subcommittee--and is this vote
going to go to the rest of the Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #57
63. It should be 2 more D's than R's
with the Dems in the Majority. Vote will probably be along party lines just like the House was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:14 AM
Original message
Good --thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
58. tom coburn is an ass like our other senator, inhofe
deliver us from this strangle hold by the re:puke:s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #58
67. Reminds me of "Ruprecht" :"Oklahoma! Oklahoma! Oklahoma!"
"Dirty Rotten Scoundrels."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
59. remember the good old days when clintons BJ was on every channel?
:sarcasm:

It is sickening that it is so hard to find this hearing. Thank you for the cbs link in this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
60. Funny, Coburn brings up the case of Ark saying 'it was to give
somebody a shot!'

Yeah, put in the Rove-trained protege whose expertise is digging up dirt into Arkansas and find ammunition against the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
61. What's with this Republic yapping now about how people don't want Congress to
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 10:13 AM by WinkyDink
have this "blood-sport. This is high-school."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
62. Why are none of these Democrats countering with WH trying to skirt the Senate approval process?
Coburn is a jerk. This is 'high school.'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithjx Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #62
65. Clinton's BJ all the time definitely was NOT high school...
It was middle school. Idiots.
KJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
66. ....missed the name but they said....
pretty much accusing people of playing to the press instead of getting about the "people's business"

it's not that important in the grand scheme (DOJ scandal)

calling it a case of politics over policy
people wanting to "play politics"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:15 AM
Original message
Leahy wants to vote now, Coburn hypocrite, CONS did this to Clinton
for a blow job. We have a bigger reason as to why we are going after these liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
68. Did Coburn just conflate this issue with Anna Nicole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #68
71. yes
both are distracting "dirty" stories for the american public
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
69. Thank God for Tom Coburn!!! Without him, I'd never be able to figure
out what message is sent to the American people! He's sure got his finger on the pulse of it! NOT!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #69
74. Teddy is cutting to the criminal chase. HAHAHAHA!!! About calling off
the tobacco case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
70. OMG. Comparing this issue with the media fixation on ANS. What a MORON.
"Politics shouldn't trump good policy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
72. FINALLY , . . Kennedy!
Bringing up the Tobacco case... The interference!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #72
76. The interfering with the Justice Dept career people...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithjx Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
73. Coburn says we should try out Fielding's offer.
Come back later if it doesn't work.

How bout paying attention to the last 6 years and the games the administration has played. Lesson learned, maybe???
KJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #73
81. Political playbook: Get Dems to accept Fielding's offer, then call them wussies
Plan B: Accuse Democrats of playing politics for refusing Fielding's offer, then call them wussies for not wanting to make hard choices in doing the business of the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #73
83. did any of the repubs even read the letter, if we accept there will be no more inteviews
Such interviews may cover, and would be limited to, the subject of (a) communications between the White House and persons outside the White House concerning the request for resignations of the U.S. attorneys in question; and (b) communications between the White House and members of Congress concerning those requests. Those interviews should be conducted by both committees jointly. Questioning of White House officials would be conducted by a member or limited number of members, who would be accompanied by committee staff. Such interviews would be private and conducted without the need for an oath, transcript, subsequent testimony, or the subsequent issuance of subpoenas. A representative of the Office of the Counsel to the President would attend these interviews and personal counsel to the invited officials may be present at their election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
75. Teddy bringing up the tobacco case interference
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
77. Fucking FINALLY, Kennedy says 'they made this guy a US attorney without senate approval'
Keep saying that!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #77
93. Yes. To me, that is the most relevant issue. So glad for this string!!!
I'm unable to watch the proceeding and it's driving me nuts!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
78. Thanks so much for starting this thread.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #78
84. Thank you and everyone else for tuning in and posting!!!!!
Starting the thread was the easy part....it's the people who help by posting what is going on that do the hard work :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
79. The GALL of that Bushie just now, to say politics shouldn't over-ride policy!! Tell your CULT-LEADER
That's what all these firings were!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #79
100. Exactly! It shouldn't, but it does when it comes to the WH and
the GOP enablers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
80. Kennedy speaking and talking about how political appointees
for agenda driven reasons made political decisions that harmed people

giving several examples...to include civil rights
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithjx Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
82. They are waking Teddy up.
Look out, if he gets going.
Discussing how the political interferer was rewarded by becoming US Atty in Missouri. HAH.
KJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
85. Sessions is speaking now... then the vote...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #85
95. Sounds like the vote will split on party line
God I detest Arlen Specter. He's such a hypocritical piece of shit. He wants it every which way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
86. The vote!!! Oh, wait...another Con has something to say.
:eyes:

Leahy giving it to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #86
88. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
87. Yay! They are finally goingto vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
89. Specter wants to vote, Leahy moves to vote, Sessions whines...
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 10:23 AM by 48percenter
what I don't get to speak?

Leahy gives it to him, "I stuck up for your legislation last week when you weren't even HERE! And you held up my vote!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithjx Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
90. Sessions is coming....
Rat Bastard!
KJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #90
94. ewwww! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
91. The vote will be called before the Senators return to the floor...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithjx Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #91
97. What feed are you on??
You post what they say as they say it!!! (I'm on CBS)
KJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #97
102. CSpan radio. . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithjx Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #102
109. thx. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
96. LOL "That's why we need transcripts"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
98. Oh shut the hell up Sessions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #98
107. You just read my mind. Blah blah blah blah.......ad nauseum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
99. (appplause for transcript requirements - alluding to a little
difficulty in remembering - I think it was an interjection by Leahey)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
101. Ha! Schumer just interjected, "That's why we need transcripts." Making these Republics look like
the fools and knaves they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
103. Someone should ask Sessions what happened to his
bi-partisanship spirit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
104. Sessions "let's avoid conflict"
LMAO

Yeah...let us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #104
106. But, but, aren't THEY the strong and brave men??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #104
108. Fine! He can skip the hearing then! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
105. Sessions wants to avoid confrontation
"not let our emotions get the best of us."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #105
111. Confrontation.... or investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #105
112. WHAT ARE THEY HIDING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #105
113. Oh, here it comes: The Democrats are just ANGRY, looking for REVENGE.
PARTISAN, to boot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #113
115. See Political Playbook manual in Post #81 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #105
114. Sessions??? Emotions????
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
110. How the hell do they know if it's a criminal case
without sworn testimony? What a shill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #110
118. "Curiosity isn't enough...to over-ride E .Privilege."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
116. Yo, Sessions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
117. Session is interminable. . . "curiosity is not enough". .blech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
119. Sessions "Curiosity isn't enough"
to find out what was said and done



What a hypocrite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #119
123. Schumer: "Why no transcripts?" Sessions: "I don't know."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
120. Hey Solly, thread #2 please, official?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #120
129. OPPS!!! My bad...I did. Thanks!!!!
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 10:38 AM by Solly Mack
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x473643

I honestly thought the vote would come before the thread got too big.

Silly me lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
121. What is the justification for "no transcript?" - Schumer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
122. "What is the justification for no transcript?" (Schumer)
Sessions "I don't know"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
124. oh god, please do not tell me these guys are setting these crimes
aside? oh please no. The Dems have to stay on top of this. Do not listen to any talking points of the repigs. please don't.:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
125. They KNOW no transcript isn't satisfactory! What bullshit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
126. *What* subpoenas?
Wake me when one gets issued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
127. New thread started!!!!!! Thread 2 link below
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
128. Brownback: let's just hold up for a couple of weeks
dissassociate from the "passions of the moment".

Um, sure.

"What can be gained by rushing at this point in time?"

Oh, they know they are screwed, don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
130. "The passions of the moment"FUCK YOU TOO Brownbeck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
131. I just can't believe that all of the Repukes are such whores. Where is their sense of Justice?
They are complicit and are obstructing Justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
132. The Vote! - the ayes have it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
133. Subpoenas are Authorized!!!!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
134. LOL! Grassley wants record to reflect he voted "Aye"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
135. Brownback -
What's to be gained by rushing? We're likely to get stuck in courts the rest of this administration...the chairman has been very fair to me...let's see how this moves forward...

Leahy, All those in favor aye --- ayes have it, the subpoenas are authorized. Very nice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
136. Locking.
Please continue at thread 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC