Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CCN Lou Dobbs: 'Showdown' really a battle of partisan buffoons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:35 AM
Original message
CCN Lou Dobbs: 'Showdown' really a battle of partisan buffoons
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/21/dobbs.March22/index.html

Dobbs: 'Showdown' really a battle of partisan buffoons
By Lou Dobbs
CNN

NEW YORK (CNN) -- An incompetent attorney general, who says he wasn't fully aware that nearly 10 percent of the U.S. attorneys who work for him throughout the country were being fired and permitted the 110,000-person Justice Department that he leads to give inaccurate information at best, or simply lie about it at worst, to the Congress and the American people, has the full confidence of the president who's lost the confidence of most people.

And this is what passes for a big-time, dramatic, historic constitutional crisis in 21st century America? You've got to be kidding. This is the most partisan, politically driven administration in history, and we're all supposed to be surprised by its conduct and motivation in the firing of these U.S. attorneys? Please.

Now the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law has voted to approve subpoenas that would force chief policy adviser Karl Rove, former White House counsel Harriet Miers and other top presidential aides to testify publicly and under oath about their involvement in the firings.

Guess what? That little ol' subcommittee can't do much of anything to force executive branch employees to testify without the help of the very man and department at the center of this altogether silly and over-baked controversy. That's right; Attorney General Alberto Gonzales or one of his U.S. attorneys would have to enforce any subpoenas refused by any of the president's aides.

...more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gee Lou, your argument actually makes the case
Sheesh. Let's see ... the problem is that the AG, a partisan toady, will quite *obviously* impede this investigation... hmmm... and this is "not* a problem in your mind, Lou?

Talk about irony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Dobbs is a conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh yeah, possible obstruction of justice/perversion of justice...
is really just such a partisan endeavor. I don't even agree with most of the people who fired in politics, they are mostly Republicans, but even these Republicans got fucked because they just happened to do their jobs without letting partisanship get in the way. Fuck off Dobbs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Lou is a partisan buffoon n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. True
Every time he puffs himself up bragging about the "Lou Dobbs Democrats" in his viewing audience, I laugh my ass off. Get over yourself, buffoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Is it true that Gonzo and gang would have to enforce those subpeonas?
Anyone know if that factoid is correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Not entirely
The Democrats could take it to the courts and they would decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Not him personally, but the USAtty in DC
who, of course, was appointed by Fredo less than a year ago I believe (hey... was he confirmed by the senate...?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. So theoretically, the Congressional subpeonas could sit in limbo
if the AG office never got around to enforcing them?

Jus ttrying to be clear here since I am dead sure the Bushies will do everything to prevent Rove from testifying under oath. This would seem to be a no-brainer for them - just sit on the damn things and wait it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. The REPUBLICAN Senate?
The lines are blurred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Jeffrey Taylor, USAtty for DC
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/dc/US_Attorney/index.html

Biography of U.S. Attorney
Jeffrey A. Taylor

Jeffrey A. Taylor was appointed interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia by Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales on September 22, 2006. He was sworn in and took office on September 29, 2006.

From 2002 to 2006, Mr. Taylor served as Counselor to Attorney Generals John Ashcroft and Gonzales, where he handled a broad array of matters, including oversight of the Department’s national security, terrorism, and criminal litigation and policy, as well as the operations of the Department’s law enforcement components.

Mr. Taylor served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of California from 1995–1999, where he prosecuted a variety of criminal matters, including international drug trafficking organizations. From 1999-2002, Mr. Taylor served as Counsel to the U.S. Senate’s Committee on the Judiciary, working on issues including criminal law, terrorism, and national security.

Mr. Taylor began his legal career as a law clerk to the Honorable John C. Mowbray, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Nevada, from 1991–1992, and then worked for three years in private practice. He obtained his Juris Doctor degree from Harvard Law School and his Bachelor of Arts degree from Stanford University. Mr. Taylor, and his wife, Marcia Taylor, are residents of the District of Columbia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. Lou Dobbs is just an old racist fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
13. Too bad Bush isn't mexican.
Otherwise Lou would be getting the KY out for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. Lou Dobbs is a one trick pony
He finally found a topic that gave him a lot of attention and he refuses to look at anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC