Democrats Boost Funding for Veterans Neglected by Bush's Mishandling of Iraq War, Walter Reed

[bigtree]

WASHINGTON, March 22 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ --

Senate Democrats today discussed their proposal to increase funding for veterans beyond what is currently proposed in the president's inadequate budget. The budget proposed by Senate Democrats keeps our promises to America's veterans by dedicating $3.5 billion more than the Bush budget allots.

Democrats are stepping up to support those who sacrifice the most as
the Bush administration neglects America's veterans, the senators said.
They pointed to the mismanagement of the war in Iraq and the failure to
provide appropriate care and treatment to injured soldiers, including an
internal report revealing shameful maintenance problems in the Veterans'
Affairs vast network of 1,400 health clinics and hospitals. The review
found mold in patient care areas, leaky roofs and instances of bat colonies
in health facilities.

Lt. Brady Van Engelen, an Iraq war veteran and former Walter Reed
outpatient, and Joseph A. Violante, national legislative director of
Disabled American Veterans, joined Senators Daniel Akaka, Patty Murray,
Debbie Stabenow and Amy Klobuchar in proposing the increased support.

"Caring for returning servicemembers and veterans must be considered an
inherent cost of war, not an afterthought," Akaka said. "For years,
President Bush has funded his wars through emergency War Supplemental
packages he has submitted to Congress. Those appropriations have increased
funding for the wars, but not for the care veterans will need once they
leave the military. The sad truth is, more war means more wounded warriors,
needing serious medical and rehabilitative care. The pending Budget
Resolution passed by Chairman Conrad and his colleagues on the Budget
Committee finally proposes to fund VA health care appropriately for these
new wars."

Said Murray: "As we begin the fifth year of this war, the lack of
administration spending on our nation's veterans is everywhere you look.
Whether it is veterans struggling to get mental healthcare, long waiting
lines for initial benefits claims, or a lack of focus on TBI care, we are
seeing what happens when veterans care does not get the funding it
deserves. By increasing funding for veterans, this budget does what the
administration has long failed to do -- recognize our service members as a
cost of this war."

"No group of individuals deserves our respect, support and admiration
as Americans more than those who selflessly and voluntarily choose to wear
the uniform," Stabenow said. "They put their lives on the line for us every
day, and all they ask in return is that when they come home from the
battlefield that their nation will take care of them. We must consider the
ongoing cost of medical care for America's veterans as part of the
continuing cost of national defense, and our budget does just that."

"At a time when we are spending billions on wars and reconstruction
projects overseas, we can certainly afford this increase in veterans
funding at home," added Klobuchar. "The VA funding in this resolution is
just the first in a series of payments towards that debt that we owe these
soldiers on the front lines who have sacrificed for us."

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/03-22-2007/0004551532&EDATE=

[MethuenProgressive]

1. good news, thanks!

[KansDem]

2. USA Today today: "Farm aid plumps up Iraq funding: Democrats insert $3.7B that's unrelated to war"

So the Dems want to really support the troops!

The Media whores at USA Today are in full spin today...

[bigtree]

3. support our returning soldiers by investing in their communities

money for farmers, not war . . .