Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does Roland Burris really believe he can strong arm his way into the Senate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 04:06 PM
Original message
Does Roland Burris really believe he can strong arm his way into the Senate?
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 04:12 PM by RiverStone
I hope there is some middle ground. I have nothing against Burris, he seems to be a person of integrity and good service. Heard him on CNN say that he has a constitutional right to show up on The Hill next week; hopefully, that won't lead to some awkward confrontation.

Blago is an annoying fly in the Obama transition team effort. Blago also is in the unique position to not turn this situation into more of a circus, but that would mean making a selfless act for the good of the party; highly doubtful of that coming from this arrogant, narcissistic creep.

The people of Ill deserve equal representation in the Senate, lets hope this resolves soon with impeachment.





On Edit: kant spel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's perfectly legal. The IL Dem's dropped the ball by not voting for "a special election."
Remember, Blago has NOT yet even been formally indicted, much less convicted of anything.

I'm ashamed of Harry Reid stepping in so early. IF ONLY gutless Harry had the PASSION for filibustering the Alito Confirmation AS MUCH as his dislike of Blago THEN he could have rightly earned his "Senator" title. Harry Reid cannot go soon enough from the Majority Leader's seat to please me. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. A special election was too much of a risk of electing a Pub.
Understandably, the Dems have a terrible reputation in Ill right now, much the same as the Pubs do on the Fed level. I can't blame the Ill
Dems for not wanting to take that risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not sure about the legality, but I agree with you fully on Harry
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 04:21 PM by RiverStone
Gutless Harry should NOT be our leader in the Senate!

The tough part is (so say the talking heads) how can you seat Burris and NOT seat Al Franken? MN law states a person can't be seated until the election is certified. As it appears Blago abused his power as Gov and is on his way to certain impeachment, the question of a politician acting with authority (to appoint) when he has likely committed impeachable offenses is questionable at best. IMO neither Al or Burris deserve a seat, yet. If the shoe was politically on the other foot - would we want a rethug seated if an obviously corrupt rethug Gov appointed him?

I know, he has not formally been sanctioned...yet. But those tapes are equal to a smoking gun and Blago trying to force the issue is just plain wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. The appointment process is not yet complete
Its being slow rolled. There will be a scene. Obama and Biden need to step in behind the scenes to calm things down and get this off the front page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. hahahahaah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That was my response too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. If there is no evidence that Blago made some bribery type bargain with Burrus,
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 05:25 PM by Uncle Joe
then I believe Burrus should be confirmed on his own merits.

That would be the simplest way out of this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonn1997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I wonder what % of the public thinks Blago was convicted already?
I haven't heard anyone discuss the presumption of innocence. I bet if you did a survey most people would say he was already found guilty. By no means am I saying he is innocent; I merely object to the *presumption of guilt* by the media, the public, and even Congressional Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Though your technically correct, his guilt seems to be in plain sight
We can go through many months of trial and appeal, or we can agree that there is no ambiguity when you listen to what he said on those tapes.

We all know what's right and wrong here, legalese aside.

Blago could do the best thing for everyone, and bow the fuck out --- alas, he will go down kicking and screaming. In the process, he will make a mockery of the office he was amazingly elected to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cash_thatswhatiwant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. He tried to put to death an obviously innocent man all to look strong on crime
he'll do anything to advance, so its really no surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Bullshit, you don't know what you are talking about
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 05:49 PM by bamalib
I was in Illinois at that time and followed the case closely. Cruz was not "obviously innocent" since he revealed to the police crime scene details an details of the girl's body known only to the police. He said he had a "dream about it". Two juries convicted him and a third would have except witnesses began to vanish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cash_thatswhatiwant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Someone CAME FORTH AND ADMITTED TO THE CRIME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. will one democrat have another democrat arrested for being appointed by another democrat....
we are one wacky party...who need's a opposition party?




:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. Burris is looking awfully crooked to this Illinoisian
anbody who would accept the nomination from Blago looks like nothing mroe than a crook to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. What are you hearing on the streets?
Since it's your home, are folks just mad as hell at Blago? I assume people believe impeachment can't come fast enough. We all heard what he said on those tapes...

I say throw his crooked ass out, if he wants to sue someone for defamation of character - go for it. He would lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Everybody I knows thinks kicking Blago out yesterday
is taking too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC