Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ted Kennedy, the "Lion of the Senate,"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:29 PM
Original message
Ted Kennedy, the "Lion of the Senate,"
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 07:33 PM by pnwmom
had no legislative experience before he took his brother's Senate seat in a special election.

He was a so-so speaker in his early years.

Then there was the sad matter of Chappaquidick.

Who would have guessed the beloved and powerful leader that he would become?

From Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_kennedy

In 1960, John Kennedy was elected President of the United States and vacated his Massachusetts Senate seat. Ted would not be eligible to fill his brother's vacant Senate seat until February 22, 1962, when he would turn thirty. Therefore the President-elect asked Massachusetts Governor Foster Furcolo to name a Kennedy family friend Benjamin A. Smith II to fill out John's term (under the authority of the 17th Amendment to the Constitution, and state law). This kept the seat open for Ted.<13> In 1962, Kennedy was elected to the Senate from Massachusetts in a special election. He was elected to a full six-year term in 1964 and was reelected in 1970, 1976, 1982, 1988, 1994, 2000 and 2006.<2>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sure, but he's white. Black people aren't electable, as the last election clearly demonstrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. There are many more black people in the U.S. House, compared to their percentage
in the general population, than there are women in the House compared to their (majority) status in the U.S. There are 47 African Americans but only 74 women in the House, even though AA comprise 12% of the population and women more than 50%.

True, there are no U.S. Senators who will be black, now that Obama has left.

But Obama will be the first African-American President, and there still has never been a woman President, despite the fact that the majority of Americans are female.

I think it's a toss-up as to which group is more under-represented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. what is your point? caroline? i'm not sure what you mean n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Partly. But I had just heard the comment with regard to Tammy Duckworth,
that she shouldn't be appointed to the Illinois Senate seat because she lacked legislative experience. And I think that legislative experience is only one qualifier, and its absence shouldn't be a disqualifier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Agreed. Professional politicians hold no attraction for me....
and more and more, people are catching on to the fact that we need QUALIFIED Congresscritters, regardless of any other factors.

Personally, I'd like to see far more academics and (successful) business types being elected. 2010 and 2012 should be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. See that "special election" thing there? Crazy, I know. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. But many DUers here would have opposed him in the special election
because of his family name and because he had no legislative experience.

And it sounds as if the only reason he wasn't appointed before the special election is because he wasn't 30 years old yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. And that would have been their right. And TK would have won the special election anyway.
As it turned out, he had phenomenal political skills. Which is wonderful. However, there's no particular reason to believe that either Caroline Kennedy or Tammy Duckworth possess such skills. Neither have been able to win a race for anything. Neither have demonstrated an ability to connect with voters, craft a message and an image, or successfully withstand the rigors of a campaign. Sure, with a bit of nurturing, they might turn out to be pure gold. And they might turn out to be pure lead, too.

I don't see any reason to throw a hail mary when you only need one yard. I'm sure such plays have worked in the past, but it's not a smart risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. And there was no reason to suspect how strong a Senator that Ted would make.
But given her wide connections and her proven fund raising ability, I don't see appointing her to be a Hail Mary pass. It would be a practical move, not a desperate one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. "Connections" and "fundraising ability" aren't usually the first things I look for
when I'm thinking about what makes a good Senator. But I will admit that she has those in spades. So did Dubya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. But her connections are to people like Ted Kennedy and Obama.
The quality of the connections matters a lot. Dubya's connected to a lot of loathsome individuals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. He was elected by the people of Massachusetts. Big difference. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. But he WOULD have been appointed instead of the family friend if he had been
old enough yet. He was only 29 -- too young to be appointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC