Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Army Quashed Anthrax Investigation Led By Ft. Detrick Scientists (NYT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:37 PM
Original message
The Army Quashed Anthrax Investigation Led By Ft. Detrick Scientists (NYT)
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 07:53 PM by kpete
NYT: The Army quashed an investigation led by Ft. Detrick's own scientists.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/us/04anthrax.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=all

When institute scientists began their own review of the evidence, nervous Army officials ordered the inquiry dropped.

..........................

And it turns out that Ivins testified before a grand jury in 2007.

In May 2007, Dr. Ivins — assured by prosecutors that he was not a target of the investigation — testified under oath to a grand jury on two consecutive days. He answered all the questions about anthrax. Only once did he plead his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, when he was asked about his secret interest in sororities.

Given the timing, I'd be curious why over a year passed and they got no closer to Ivins.

..............

But the biggest revelation of the story is that the most dubious (IMO) theory of the case came from the woman who first pitched Ivins as a suspect. You'll recall that the only logic the FBI offered for why Ivins would twice drive to Princeton to mail anthrax is that the mailbox was on the same street as an office for a sorority that he obsessed about?

Well, the person who first suggested he might be responsible did so, partly, based on her allegation that Ivins had stalked her because of her affiliation with the same sorority. That person is Nancy Haigwood, who knew Ivins from grad school at UNC.

much more (WOW)at:
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/01/03/anthrax-again/#more-3317
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kickworthy,
eminently so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caretha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Very interesting
If we only knew the truth, it would probably shock us to our toenails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. So sick of bogus reality creators.
Their cookie cutter reality just isn't as good as the original. Sub par, mediocre, mundane, c, even d-grade, BORING; talking about Nancy Haigwood and her soap/lifetime channel stalker subplot here but really the whole scenario reeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pilsner Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ivins was a registered Democrat
and the antrax showed up in the offices of Majority Leader Tom Daschle and Chairmn of the Judiciary Cmte Pat Leahy's offices.

This was right when the Patriot Act was being considered by Congress and Daschle and Leahy were the only two members of Congress who could block the Patriot Act.

And then, the two senators offices were swarmed by Federal agents digging through their papers.

I'm not even gonna bother to read the NYT story as I'm sure they ignored those little tidbits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. For all the research NYT says they did, this reads a lot like the old stories.
There's a new nugget here and there, but not many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. So, what happened between the 2007 Grand Jury and 2008, when the FBI concluded Ivins was the suspect
Not much, that I can tell, other than the fact that Ivins conveniently suicided himself. Dead men can't defend their own reputations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Every anthrax expert that was interviewed said that one person couldn't have done it alone.
Strangely, that doesn't seem to mean much to the FBI who have to wrap this case up and pitch it in the "done" box.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC