NYT: The Army quashed an investigation led by Ft. Detrick's own scientists.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/us/04anthrax.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=all When institute scientists began their own review of the evidence, nervous Army officials ordered the inquiry dropped. ..........................
And it turns out that Ivins testified before a grand jury in 2007.
In May 2007, Dr. Ivins — assured by prosecutors that he was not a target of the investigation — testified under oath to a grand jury on two consecutive days. He answered all the questions about anthrax. Only once did he plead his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, when he was asked about his secret interest in sororities. Given the timing, I'd be curious why over a year passed and they got no closer to Ivins.
..............
But the biggest revelation of the story is that the most dubious (IMO) theory of the case came from the woman who first pitched Ivins as a suspect. You'll recall that the only logic the FBI offered for why Ivins would twice drive to Princeton to mail anthrax is that the mailbox was on the same street as an office for a sorority that he obsessed about?
Well, the person who first suggested he might be responsible did so, partly, based on her allegation that Ivins had stalked her because of her affiliation with the same sorority. That person is Nancy Haigwood, who knew Ivins from grad school at UNC.
much more (WOW)at:
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/01/03/anthrax-again/#more-3317