Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Even to his defenders, Bush's legacy is 'debatable'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:30 AM
Original message
Even to his defenders, Bush's legacy is 'debatable'
Even to his defenders, Bush's legacy is 'debatable'

By David Lightman | McClatchy Newspapers


WASHINGTON — George W. Bush was supposed to be a president schooled in consensus building and tough, effective management.

However, the first chief executive with a master's in business administration — from Harvard, no less, and the son of a president known for his foreign-policy expertise — is leaving President-elect Barack Obama a nation that's arguably in the worst shape since Herbert Hoover left Franklin Roosevelt the Great Depression and a world in which fascism was on the march 76 years ago.

"Obama gets Pearl Harbor and the Depression all rolled into one," said Gleaves Whitney, the director of the Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies in Grand Rapids, Mich.

While scholars estimate that it takes at least a generation before a president's legacy can be analyzed objectively, many already are unflinching in their assessment of Bush.

The 43rd president presided over a "free-for-all in which powerful insiders . . . have played roles as policy entrepreneurs," said Karen Hult, a presidential expert at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Va.

"We can certainly talk about his remarkably sloppy decision-making process. That did have consequences," added George Edwards, a presidential scholar at Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas.

more...

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/politics/story/58795.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Boy, if this doesn't win the "No shit Sherlock" award.
Legacy?

Imperial Presidencies Cripple your Grandchildren.

Mark and Remember, Dumberica. Never put a neo-clown in the White House again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I like this title better myself-same article...
http://www.freep.com/article/20090104/NEWS07/901040400

Scholars unflinching in negative assessment of Bush's legacy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. The TRUTH will Prevail...Bush was a Collosal Fuckup....still is...he is
an utter Failure...

Unprepared,

Uninterested,

Arrogant,

Lazy,

Myopic,

Bigot,

and worse of all...Apathetic...no Empathy at all....


He is the Ultimate ASSHOLE we all love to Hate....

Not a Solver...more of a Problem maker...a true NPD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paladin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. You KNOW Bush Is In Deep Shit, When Somebody From Texas A&M Trashes Him.

For years he's been regarded as some sort of deity on that right-wing campus.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. And it's downhill from here for this worthless person. Why did
it take so long for people to wake up? There's the travesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You're fishing for travesties . . .
. . . how about 55-57 million (not sure of the number, but it's pretty frightening) people who voted for a cranky bastard whose campaign was more or less the same Bewsh-shit that got us into this mess in the first place, and his running mate that would barely qualify as a Burger King manager, much less the second-highest office in the land?

I mean, Sarah PALIN? The woman speaks in talking points, she's a tabloid publisher's dream candidate and she can't seem to take reign of her own damned family, much less her state.

Is this not a neon sign stating we no longer take Presidential elections seriously?

Sarah Palin.

56 million people.

Astounding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. There's no accounting for
brains, party loyalty, racism, or even people voting against their best interests in these United States.
Yes, that is (another) travesty to add to the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC