Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TMZ ~ John Travolta's Son: Meds Ultimately Did Harm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:33 PM
Original message
TMZ ~ John Travolta's Son: Meds Ultimately Did Harm
The title may be a bit misleading but HERE is the latest ~

TMZ has learned more about the medical condition of John Travolta's son, Jett, and the medication that ultimately didn't work.

We're now told the grand mal seizures Jett suffered were "frequent and extremely serious." Travolta's lawyers, Michael Ossi and Michael McDermott, tell us "each seizure was like a death," with Jett losing consciousness and convulsing.

We now know Jett was taking a drug called Depokate, a strong anti-seizure medication. There have been reports Travolta refused to give his son anti-seizure meds because of Scientology but those stories are not true.

Jett had been having seizures on an average of every four days, until he started taking Depokate. Ossi and McDermott say the drug initially worked, reducing the frequency to approximately once every three weeks.


More at the link above.

With all the chatter about the Travolta's not seeking medical attention due to religion, I thought it best to set the record straight.

Again, my condolences to the Travolta and Preston families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Depokate has horrific side effects
This poor kid was very sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. That's what I've heard as well.
Such a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
120. yes it does
poor child. Very sad for the family. :(



http://www.drugs.com/depakote.html

Before taking Depakote
In rare cases, Depakote has caused life-threatening liver failure, especially in children younger than 2 years old. Children of this age may be at even greater risk for liver problems if they use more than one seizure medication, if they have a metabolic disorder, or if they have a brain disease causing mental impairment (such as Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease, Huntington disease, multiple sclerosis, or a brain injury or infection). Depakote has also caused rare cases of life-threatening pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas). Pancreatitis can come on suddenly and symptoms may start even after you have been taking Depakote for several years. Do not take Depakote if you have liver disease or a urea cycle disorder.

Before taking this medication, tell your doctor if you have:

*

a bleeding or blood clotting disorder;
*

a history of head injury, brain disorder, or coma;
*

a family history of a urea cycle disorder;
*

a family history of infant deaths with unknown cause; or
*

HIV or CMV (cytomegalovirus) infection.

If you have any of these conditions, you may need a dose adjustment or special tests to safely take Depakote.

You may have thoughts about suicide while taking this medication. Tell your doctor if you have new or worsening depression or suicidal thoughts during the first several months of treatment, or whenever your dose is changed.

Your family or other caregivers should also be alert to changes in your mood or symptoms. Your doctor will need to check you at regular visits. Do not miss any scheduled appointments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds like they were nothing but loving and caring parents
They went through a lot with their son and my heart goes out to them. I hope people will allow them to grieve and leave their choice of religion out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Agreed.
:( Such a heartbreaking story all around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_DeLeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Scientology...
probably played some role in his sons death.

Its always ends badly when cultists avoid proper medical treatment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gblady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. excuse me....
while I'm with you that cults are dangerous.....

I think many more deaths are caused by "proper" medical treatment
than by avoiding traditional medical treatment...
(which it does not look like they were)



Medical Errors - A Leading Cause of Death

The JOURNAL of the AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (JAMA) Vol 284, No 4, July 26th 2000 article written by Dr Barbara Starfield, MD, MPH, of the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, shows that medical errors may be the third leading cause of death in the United States.

The report apparently shows there are 2,000 deaths/year from unnecessary surgery; 7000 deaths/year from medication errors in hospitals; 20,000 deaths/year from other errors in hospitals; 80,000 deaths/year from infections in hospitals; 106,000 deaths/year from non-error, adverse effects of medications - these total up to 225,000 deaths per year in the US from iatrogenic causes which ranks these deaths as the # 3 killer. Iatrogenic is a term used when a patient dies as a direct result of treatments by a physician, whether it is from misdiagnosis of the ailment or from adverse drug reactions used to treat the illness. (drug reactions are the most common cause).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Calling errors "proper" is fucking stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
77. How so?
Given two general alternatives 1) trust the medical professionals or 2) reject their advice based on some kooky cultish beliefs, then the errors that the MPs make is certainly part of choice #1. Otherwise what is the definition of proper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Most religions could be considered cults.
Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. one problem with that.... links>>
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 02:34 PM by sam sarrha
by definition current mainstream religions arent usually considered cults, but if any of the mainstream religions would be introduced today, they would be roundly criticized

i recently discovered this gem.. http://users.skynet.be/sky50779/mohammed.htm
"snip...
Theophanes, a monk (752-817), wrote in his Chronography that Muhammad suffered from epilepsy. From that time most historians repeated this opinion. When in the late 19th century better notions of psychopathology became common, this diagnosis was challenged. Some thought his disease was hysteria or hystero-epilepsy, although for most scientists epilepsy was excluded. There was no definitive answer to this question. A better scientific examination of the sources has made clear that all symptoms of acromegaly are present with some psychopathological paranoid traits. Acromegaly is caused by a small tumour of the hypophysis, beginning most of the time about the fortieth year and ending in the sixtieth year with an apoplexy of the hypophysis...snip"

which also explains why no images of the prophet are allowed, the condition can be seriously disfiguring. there are islamic images of the Prophet.. full face and these with his face covered
http://www.zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/islamic_mo_face_hidden/

but i still think Abraham was Schizophrenic ..voices telling him to kill his child is a cinch to that connection

DEFINITION OF CULT
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult

"snip...Cult typically refers to a cohesive social group devoted to beliefs or practices that the surrounding population considers to be outside the mainstream, with a notably positive or negative popular perception. The word "cult", which has at least eight meanings, has been a source of confusion...snip

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #29
51. Note the "outside the mainstream"
criteria.

Thanks for the food for thought. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
97. How so?
the kid got treatment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
178. Your psychic detective act might be (unintentionally) funny...
were it not so shameful, in this case.

You don't know anything about the child's medical care. You have no grounds for any conclusion, including your heartless pronouncement.

The one thing you may know, because of this report, is that the child was taking the powerful psychiatric drug depakote, which is well known to be dangerous. As this is exactly the kind of treatment that Scientology rejects, you have even less grounds for spreading your prejudice that the Travoltas are "cultists" who would reject the boon of psychiatry.

On the contrary, the child's death may in fact be related to the cult of psychiatry, not that of Scientology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
234. Time for you to STFU and have some respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. So ti seems the Travoltas WERE working with doctors, despite the multiple postings about their
Beliefs keeping them from doing so.

Thanks for posting this. Too many people had a knee-jerk reaction and raved about Scientology, when in fact these folks WERE trying to do the right thing for their child, and work with actual MDs.

My condolences to them for the loss of their child. I couldn't imagine what I would do if I had to deal with this sort of loss.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Absolutely.
I've suggested people wait for the facts before jumping on a blame bandwagon.

I'm glad the truth is on the side of the family in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. Well that's what his lawyers are saying, and they are being paid by him to say it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
55. Lawyers defend their clients,
this does not mean they're lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #55
66. Doesn't mean they are being truthful either. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #66
71. You're right.
But I don't think it fair or appropriate to assume the parents and their attorneys are lying simply because they have a particular set of beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
85. guilty until proven innocent?
Depakote is a psych medicine as well as anti seizure med.

It can be used for more than one thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
214. Yes, it does SEEM that way doesn't it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. The poor kid.
Was he supposed to grow out of it or was this how he was going to be for the rest of his life?

How sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. TMZ says the kid was taken off depakote (after it became less
effective).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Right.
At that point the meds only served to damage him further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Aren't there other drugs for seizures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Often
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 01:56 PM by mzmolly
when one doesn't work, the others are futile and may continue to cause harm. Must be why the family (after consulting with their neurologist) decided they'd rather have seizures vs. seizures and liver damage etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I suppose if there was damage to his liver.
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 02:41 PM by lizzy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. I wonder if that's one of those drugs that one has to be taken
off of very, very carefully?

Poor family. What a horrible thing to have happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. From what I can gather, yes.
Someone should be weaned off depakote rather than be taken off cold turkey. However TMZ doesn't say when exactly depakote was stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. I wasn't trying to imply that they'd done something wrong
I just had the memory that that was one of those tricky drugs - I think most seizure meds are like that.

The medications can be miraculous - but there's usually a flip side. Sounds as though his seizures were terribly hard to control. That must have been so hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
91. Side effects.
He was a skinny child then gained a lot of weight (based on the photos). One of the side effect of depakote might be weight gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
240. Any admission of being taken off them meds, and not replacing them...
makes it sound like something is up here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomreedtoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
248. Why do you believe The Moron Zone?
Or, maybe on DU, the acronym means The Moran Zone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'll bet that the Scientologists were messing with his meds.
They probably tried to tell him that his seizures were caused by his thetans and he needed more auditing...

Fuck Scientology...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Doesn't sound like it.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. Gee- I wonder if the OP from the thread blaming Scientology will apologize?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
203. Apologize for what? The lawyers speak and you take them at their word? LMAO. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
238. Bite me.
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 10:51 PM by originalpckelly
I will not take the word of a liar *cough* lawyer for the person who may have something to hide. You're very gullible my friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. I can't imagine the pain they must be going through.
Losing a child (at any age) is a tragedy beyond description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. The report I heard this morning is that Travolta
tried to resuscitate his son while waiting on the ambulance.

My heart goes out for this family.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. i immediately thought the poor boy had brain damage from serious seizures when i saw a video of him,
i have worked with children that had frequent seizures.. and i was initially suspicious of the cult behavior withholding medication scenario. i know about the Scientologist's.. they are stranger than anyone knows, VERY FUCK'n SCARY.. BEYOND BELIEF SCARY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
27. Uhh folks
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 02:25 PM by babythunder
why is this information being released by the Travolta's attorneys?

"We're now told the grand mal seizures Jett suffered were "frequent and extremely serious." Travolta's lawyers, Michael Ossi and Michael McDermott, tell us "each seizure was like a death," with Jett losing consciousness and convulsing."

I don't know about anyone else but my medical issues are discussed with my Doctor NOT my attorneys.

If this death was by natural and could not have been avoided why are their attorneys involved because usually a spoke person for the family would just release a statement stating how the family devastated by the loss of their family member and that the appreciate the show of sympathy......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
57. The attorneys are stating the facts
given the amount of misinformation circulating I presume? If the Travoltas were Baptist, it would not likely be necessary to defend the parents of a child involved in such a tragedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
28. His Lawyers say that, and most people eat that shit right up
Lawyers are the best fucking liars in the world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
50. Easy enough
to verify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
30. And the scientology haters just can't shut up
It appears that no matter what evidence is revealed confirming that the Travoltas were loving caring parents who did everything they could for their child, the haters will keep coming back with their unfounded attacks. It is disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Look I get that
some on here absolutely loved Grease and Saturday Night Fever but if this child's death could have been prevented or caused because of his parent's beliefs then they shouldn't get a pass.

Also if you have nothing to add other then your righteous indignation isn't there something better you could do with your Sunday Afternoon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Do you have any evidence to back up your nonsense?
Please post all the links that show that the Travoltas did not provide the appropriate medical care for their child.

And no, Grease and Saturday Night Fever were terrible movies. Pulp Fiction, on the other hand, was a wonderful film.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. This is an article from 2007
une 1, 2007 -- JOHN Travolta, 53, and his wife, Kelly Preston, 44, just announced they want to try for their third child - even while they fall under increasing pressure to publicly acknowledge the disability of their son, Jett.

Travolta has either pretended there is nothing wrong with Jett, 15, or claimed his condition is Kawasaki syndrome, a disease characterized by high fever, skin rash and swelling of the lymph nodes.

But parents of autistic children say that Travolta should join Sylvester Stallone, Doug Flutie, Jenny McCarthy and Toni Braxton, who all have autistic kids, in raising awareness and research funds to cure the disease.

One magazine editor who has interviewed Travolta more than once says that the star's son is disabled - and yet he continues to behave as if nothing is wrong.

"Travolta sits there in interviews talking about how Jett loves to read or play sports, but it is clear that the boy can barely do either," the editor said.

Tim Kenny, the father of a 4-year-old autistic girl from Ocala, Fla., near the Travolta estate, told Mark Ebner of HollywoodInterrupted.com that he introduced the actor in February at a restaurant he manages "as one autistic child's father to another" but that Travolta was in denial.


"Scientology is keeping him from acknowledging his son's autism. They see it as a weakness," Kenny told Ebner.

According to the Church of Scientology, people with mental illnesses are "degraded" and capable of curing themselves by working harder on the church's teachings.

"It's fine with me if Travolta doesn't want to become the poster child for autistic parents, but every time the parent of an autistic child hears about someone else who is in this fight, it makes them feel better," said the editor who interviewed him.

"He could do so much good for autism awareness if he would just come forward."

Travolta's lawyer, Marty Singer, told Page Six: "The Travoltas are wonderful, loving parents, and their priority is their children. They have and they continue to take the best possible care of their children. To suggest anything to the contrary is very hurtful to a loving family and also would be false and defamatory."

I am a pediatric emergency room physician. We occasionally diagnose Kawasaki Disease (now properly called Kawasaki Syndrome) in young children. There are so many things wrong with the story of Jett's death that I am not sure where to start, but here's a try:

1) NO association between Kawasaki and "toxic carpet cleaning chemicals" (or any other environmental cause) has ever been established. Given that these chemicals are ubiquitous in our society, if there were an association I would expect Kawasaki to be much more common.

2) As far as I know, Kawasaki disease does not lead to brain injury or seizures. I suppose one could conjecture that if Jett had untreated heart problems from Kawasaki (which CAN happen) this could have led to a heart attack that led to seizures and death, but it sounds like Jett had seizures for a long time, which makes this a bit of a reach.


3) It would be incredibly rare to bump your head and die from a seizure.

We see children every day with seizures, and not once have I seen a child bump his head hard enough to have a brain injury from this. Of course, prolonged seizures or seizures that occur while doing something dangerous (driving, swimming, etc.) can lead to brain injury, but otherwise this is a stretch. Also, autistic children can exhibit self-injurious behavior, especially if untreated, and can exhibit behavior such as intentionally hitting their heads against walls or other hard objects. It is much more likely that a head injury led to brain injury (the cause of death) and the seizure than the other way around.
4) For John Travolta (and the news media) to report that Jett died from either Kawasaki or a seizure is incredibly irresponsible. I gurantee you that we will see 30 children in our emergency department in the coming days whose parents have read this trash and are worried that their child is at risk for death from one of these causes, and every parent with a child who has a seizure disorder will now lose more sleep because of this BS.

I am eager to learn what the autopsy shows, but unfortunately I don't think the questions of autism or a seizure preceding death can be diagnosed at autopsy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. The link for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Here's the link
http://www.nypost.com/seven/06012007/gossip/pagesix/pagesix.htm

Again if they weren't seeking proper medical treatment for their son then there is clearly a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. ah page six - say no more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. So you think it's all lies
in the article? Besides Page Six in terms of gossip mags is pretty legitimate it's not as though they get their info from some random people on the street most of their stories are verifiable. They just happen to not report on very serious issues but it doesn't make it untrue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #49
64. page six is a gossip column
you are making criminal accusations against the Travoltas and backing your claims up with a link to a gossip column. If you weren't serious I would suspect you of just playing games here. Instead you seem clueless. Fortunately for you, you have lots of company also doing the same regarding the Travoltas. It is DU's local crop of Nancy Grace clones, desperately seeking scandal. Vile behavior, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #46
143. In this case, I'll personally vouch for one of the sources.
Mark Ebner (not the author of the piece, but quoted in the piece) is a friend of mine going back many years, and a damn good investigative reporter. He won't report unless the information is ironclad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #143
150. All Ebner did was pass on the opinion of a restaurant manager
that doesn't really get us any further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #143
152. Mr. Ebner
merely quoted the father of an autistic child, however. It would appear that this parent is THE source for the unsubstantiated rumor that Scientology would not allow for the family to acknowledge a diagnosis of autism? Parents of autistic children are not qualified to diagnose autistic children. Also, a diagnosis would often come from a neurologist and the family is said to have been working with such a specialist.

:shrug:

I will say at least the article offered the Travolta's side of the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #34
59. I've seen this loaded
speculation before. I am not convinced. The Travoltas had a right to privacy, regardless of their child's condition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #59
67. Again I ask
did the Travolta's not clearly state in interviews that there child suffered from Kawasaki disease?

Also if this was a case of a regular parent whose child died because possible negligent behavior by the parents would they not be questioned by child services if not the police? They certainly wouldn't be able to claim that they want to maintain their privacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #67
73. Years ago.
Again I ask, why should they have been required to update the masses on the evolution of their son's issues?

If this had been a "regular" parent, this family would not be scrutinized as they are at present. The child had a team of caregivers. Can you name one "regular" parent who would be called negligent for taking such measures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
117. aren't deaths from seizures relatively rare?


Asking since you are a physician. I know a little about them from my work with kids, but not the medical end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #117
172. The young man hit his head
It is unclear whether or not he hit his head during a seizure or suffered a seizure as a result of hitting his head. Nevertheless, according to the police spokesperson, Jett died from hitting his head.

link: http://www.tmz.com/2009/01/02/john-travoltas-son-dies/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Also if a child has an illness
but the parents refuse to seek proper medical care or even acknowledge the illness you wouldn't consider that negligent?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. You've assumed your conclusion.
Please provide that data that shows that the 'parents refuse(d) to seek proper medical care'. Refusing to talk publicly about their child's medical problems is basic good parenting, and none of your damn business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. You need to either follow this a little more
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 03:25 PM by babythunder
closely because your either missing a few facts or your just choosing to be obtuse.

1.Kelly Preston stated on television that there son was "cured" after detoxification and purification treatments. However, she did acknowledge that he had a lot of allergies.

2.John Travolta stated that his son became sick with Kawasaki syndrome after being exposed to household cleaners. Yet most medical professionals refute this claim stating that there is never been an established link between toxic carpet cleaners and this disease. Furthermore medical professionals have also stated that even if he was suffering from this illness it does not lead to seizures

3.You must have missed the part about how they not only refused to discuss their son's illness but also refused to acknowledge that he was even afflicted with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. You need to provide some evidence that they have not
provided proper medical care for their son or admit that you do not have that evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. Look
if you aren't able to clearly comprehend the sections in which both parents refused to acknowledge publicly and personally that their son had Autism then I don't know what to tell you. Seriously it's getting difficult to explain to someone over and over again the same information.

Kelly Preston and John Travolta both stated NOT from a gossip magazine not third hand information but from both parent's mouth that the kid was afflicted with Kawasaki disease.

Do seriously still not get that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #52
104. Which doctor said he did have autism?
And why would they say so publicly? Or did Travolta or Preston say later that he had had autism all along?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #104
114. That's the whole point
the Travolta's weren't using medical doctor's opinions about their son but rather he was be treated through "detox and purification" as per Kelly Preston and John Travolta
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #114
116. So you have made the autism diagnosis yourself, based on your extensive contact
with Jett, have you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #116
136. Umm what are you talking about
I was question the medical viability of the so-called "detoxification and purification" process that their son was on. Or did you complete not read my post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #136
141. You have stated that Jett had autism, and that the parents refused to acknowledge that
So you must have knowledge of this diagnosis. If the parents never said it, it must have been a doctor (I'd have thought that was a breach of confidentiality, but it does happen sometimes). Or you examined the boy personally, and are now making your diagnosis public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #141
145. Can you point me
to that post where I stated unequivocally that Jett Travolta had autism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #145
151. #52 and #90 (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #151
154. I was pointing out
what others around the Travoltas have said about the child and the second post was reference to MzMolly's back forth about her opinions? It may not have been autism but clearly the child was disabled which the parents refused admit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #154
161. You were stating it as fact, not as 'what others have said'
And 'those around the child' in this case is a restaurant manager - it would seem that the Travoltas go to the restaurant sometimes, but even that's not clear from the gossip column. Since they say he was on medication for some time, until its (desired) effects became less, and they had carers for him, to claim they refuse to admit he is disabled is clearly wrong.

But I'm glad to see you starting to back-pedal on the autism claim.

Are you the emergency room physician, by the way? Or was that just a copy from the various places on the web that quote appears?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #161
175. Look this stuffy is obviously circustantial
but I do believe the Travolta's story about about their son being afflicted with Kawasaki. He may have suffered from Autism as well as other ailments. But I definitely believe that this child was disabled contrary to what the Travolta's have stated. Also where is your information because clearly I am wrong and you are right so by all means bring your information to the table.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #175
191. I've not seen one quote that shows the Travoltas denying a disability.
I think you've bought into the spin and that's a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #175
202. I'm not claiming to have any information
I was questioning where you got your certainty from. Now you're saying that he may have suffered from autism, and and perhaps other things too, then I think we're all in the same boat - we don't know, the parents had the right not to talk publicly about their child's medical condition if they didn't want to, and we're better off waiting for the autopsy results, and any investigation after that, if there is one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #154
164. Again. No one's business but theirs.
Your audacity at castigating them for refusing to make public their child's disability is simply disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #164
184. For a doctor you sure are slow on the uptake
if the Travolta's didn't make his condition public at all I could totally respect that but the fact remains that both him and his went on Nationally televised interview and stated their son suffered from Kawasaki and was cured through "detoxification and purification" also being a doctor do you support this type of medical treatment? Would you subscribe this to a patient?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #184
189. Do you mean prescribe?
And, where the Travoltas suggesting that everyone do that? Going with no.

Do yourself a favor. Switch out of medical school and find some other way to support yourself. Preferably one that doesn't involve grammar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #189
195. Sorry it was a typo
sometimes I write too fast. So do you agree with the treatment of "detoxification and purification"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #154
176. What business is it of yours or anyone's for that matter if they
didn't admit publicly that their child was disabled?

If you truly are a pediatric MD, you seriously need to bone up on dealing with parents. Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #52
123. well, parental responses to their kids's autism are highly complicated


Probably no one will know exactly why this young person died unless there is an autopsy. You would think that the parents would want to know the exact cause. It's unfortunate, though, that so private and painful a matter is fodder for the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #123
131. They've requested two autopsies
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 06:04 PM by mzmolly
from what I've read. One will be conducted in the Bahamas and one in the US.

I agree, it's sad that this tragedy has become such fodder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #131
134. do they have more expert docs in the Bahamas?


just kidding. Yeah, it's a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #134
135. No but the authorities
there are investigating so they want an autopsy of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #38
60. Hear hear!
Refusing to talk publicly about their child's medical problems is basic good parenting, and none of your damn business.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Only they didn't do that
they talked about their son's medical problems only they were stating that he suffered from Kawasaki disease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. They did initially to inform people about what they believed led to the child's, then issues.
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 04:10 PM by mzmolly
But they needn't have a press release about every bowel movement their son had in later days, just to satisfy the media and or parents of neurologically challenged children.

Autism is a diagnoses and the symptoms can mimic other issues. The fact that some parents saw similarities between their autistic children and Jett Travolta does not mean he had the condition and/or that the parents were in denial.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #63
70. So then you believe
the boy had no medical aliments except a few allergies as per Kelly Preston?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #70
75. I believe
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 04:25 PM by mzmolly
the matter was a private family one. However, the article I posted indicates that the child suffered from seizures and had reason for constant supervision. Why? Who the hell cares what his diagnosis was? If the child had proper care, why does the label matter?

Obviously the child had more than allergies, as the family has indicated that he had Kawasaki's Disease and seizures etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #75
82. Again if they were you or me
you don't think child services or the police wouldn't be taking a hard look at us? If you think it's a private family matter why post in this thread or any thread having to do Jett Travolta's death why not just send a gesture of sympathy to his website or fanclub?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #82
88. There is an
investigation into any death, this one is no exception. However I am confident that if were you or I, we'd not be considered to blame unless there were evidence to support such a notion.

As for the private family matter question, you're taking my comments out of context, obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #75
121. the families explaination tying the seizure to Kawasaki is bullshit + raises a red flag
and it gets worse knowing travolta follows a psuedo scientificic cults non medically recognised judegement and treatment- they de toxed him according to the beliefs of L Ron the charlatan.
So.. it's there in print they were already subbbing Scientology's medical suggestions for real treatment. Horrifying, but the mom admitted as much. It totally fits that they would be adverse to calling Jett's conditon autism- because they believe autisitic people can heal themselves. That's why it's curious that he was not currently on siezure medicine. It would fit w/ Scientology teachings not to take the meds. Filling a prescription doesn't mean they actually had him on hte med. An avowed scientologist following L Ron's teachings closely is not exactly a conspiricy theory- it would be the most normal thing in the world. I feel sorry for the Travoltas loss, I also feel sorry they are ot of their minds with the Scientology bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #121
128. The family has not tied his death to this condition. However, seizures are a symptom
in some cases.

Almost all children with Kawasaki disease are quite irritable. Because blood vessels throughout the body can be affected to varying degrees, many other symptoms might or might not be seen. These include diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, cough, runny nose, headache, arthritis, burning urination, mouth sores, sensitivity to light, nerve weakness, confusion, or seizures.

For all we know the child had a heart attack.

Children can die from heart problems during this illness. They can also die from heart attacks later in childhood or as young adults.

http://www.drgreene.com/21_378.html

I realize Scientology is not popular, however this does not excuse jumping to conclusions. I've heard all of the things you claim above in other conversations and on the internet, but I'm awaiting the results of the investigation personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #128
139. you're not adressing how Scientologist will not treat seizures- why;s that?
it's very commonly known they do not belive in treatment for autism, maybe you need to do some research.
very funny coincidence that devoted scientologists claim seizure meds don't work- when the same idea came from L Ron, the only one we know of who's "medical" advice they actually did follow and respect? Sorry, but it looks like the Scientologists put poor Travolta on a fucked up path here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #139
165. Actually, they don't acknowledge the existence of autism
because they believe it to be psychological in nature rather than neurological.

Seizures are generally not associated with autism. They happen, of course, but it is more unusual than not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #165
207. i know! and they don;t allow usage of medicines that work on the brain... they blame the sick
and think it's all under your power to fix. with vitamins and sauna, but no psychotropics meds. including anti seizure meds.
horrifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #139
171. First of all the child had taken anti-seizure meds and the OP addressed just that.
Additionally, I am not convinced that Scientology doesn't allow for a dx. of autism, however if they were treating the seizures (until the meds no longer helped) what does the label matter?

I've heard that Jenny McCarthy is a Scientologist? I don't know that it's true, but if it is it makes the claim that one can't acknowledge autism because of the religion a bit less likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #171
205. you heard wrong about Jenny and you don;t know enough about Scientology 's policies + practices
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 08:01 PM by bettyellen
(and they are easily find) you choose ignorance, so it's not worth it to waste any more time with you. seem syou;re the one who;s happy enough to post totally vague rumours instead of doing research , and that's pretty ironic.
no one knows if he gave this anti seizure medicine a fair trial or did more than fill the prescription- and his parents were of the position that a freak named L Ron knew better than most specialists- that's pretty sad. vitamins and sauna for anything and everything that ails you, it;s very sad.
do yourself a favor and get googling, you're completely in the dark here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #205
208. I've viewed the claims about Scientology
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 07:59 PM by mzmolly
as well as the denials about such claims. I am not in the dark, I'm simply not convinced that what I've read is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #208
215. your post would indicate that "viewing" is accurate as far as the depth of your knowledge goes.
sure why you bother, but i do know that's why i will cease to bother with you!
c u later!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #215
221. Well unless
either of us has been a member of the church that's all anyone has done in terms of research ... read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #221
224. actually I have met current and former scientologists..but never you mind...
you're the one happy to spread silly rumours about Jenny Mc Carthy and shows no interst in digging deeper. you're the one who feels comepleely unable to discern anything about Scientology. hey, if it works for you to plead ignorance- go for it! and goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #224
226. I didn't
spread rumors about McCarthy, I said it has been suggested she is a Scientologist. She does have good friends in the group. But that's beside the point.

The Travolta's reportedly sought medical assistance for their child, which goes against claims to the contrary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #226
229. i know they have their lawyer talking about treatment... it;s facinating, if not credible.
you really don;t know much about this cult at all, LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #229
230. Again
I've seen various claims, and I've seen them disputed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #230
232. and you're not able to find enough info or analyse said info to discern what;s what..
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 10:15 PM by bettyellen
and that's okay if it works for you. no one's going to force you to actually form a thought or opinion of your own if you feel you're incapable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #232
235. I've not found any evidence
that the Travolta's neglected to care for their child, true. My OPINION is that we should wait for FACTS before suggesting that this family is in ANY WAY responsible for the death of their child.

Yesterday many here said the child was denied anti-seizure meds because he was raised by Scientologists, that appears to have been FALSE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #235
243. you're right -no one truly knows why siezure medicine was witheld from this kid
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 11:39 PM by bettyellen
and we are both free to form our opionions as to why. i base my guess on prior knowledge of the parent's treatment plan for this kids during a prior life threatening illness- vitamins and "detox" therapy. I think they behaved like negligent morons who fell for quakery. I hope it was just that one time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #243
244. No one even knows if a seizure is what
took his life. Perhaps it was a heart attack? Perhaps it was a medication side effect? And, heck if that's the case we can exonerate everyone can't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #244
247. the issue with Scientology is simple- they don;t like siezure meds- Jett suffered from seizures
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 11:51 PM by bettyellen
and his parents, Scientologists.. did not give him seizure meds.
It's really an issue of principle if Scientology parents are at all competant or fit to oversee tratement for anyone who has any sort of mental health problems. Or do they all follow the Sci-Fi vitamin solution as Tom cruise expounded on not too long ago. These people routinely admit, nay brag they withhold treatment, then they trot out lawyers to deny it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #247
249. I'm out.
Good night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #249
251. night molly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #32
58. I don't wish the medical choices these parents
have had to make on anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
216. Unless you have proof that
they were negligent due to their religion, which you don't right now, I'd be careful about the vile rumors that you are aiding and abetting.

This is a tragedy and there is nothing wrong with feeling sympathy for the parents.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
236. I agree.
Instead of having the decency to apologize, they keep piling on. Travolta does not deserve this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
35. More:
http://gawker.com/5122788/travoltas-rumored-gay-lover-discovered-dead-son

A TMZ.com story on the death of John Travolta's 16-year-old son, Jett, mentioned that he was found by family nanny Jeff Kathrein — but it didn't run a famous picture of Travolta kissing Kathrein.

In 2006, Kathrein and Travolta were caught by paparazzi locking lips. The Travolta camp's official explanation: Why, John kisses everyone like that! But in the wake of a teenager's death, no one stopped to ask who the man who found him dead is, and what his relationship was to the kid's father.

Kathrein is one of the Travolta family's two nannies. On his website, he describes himself as a photographer; he mostly lenses weddings. His qualifications for childcare are unclear, other than being a Scientologist like Jett's parents, John Travolta and Kelly Preston. Kathrein's wife, Ana, is also a Scientologist. (Some Scientology critics believe the church forces gays and lesbians to stay in the closet and pursue heterosexual relationships, frequently citing Travolta and Preston's marriage.)

snip

Take the family's unchallenged assertion that he suffered from Kawasaki disease, an immunological syndrome which causes painful inflammation, after exposure to carpet-cleaning chemicals, and that he died after hitting his head after suffering a related seizure. At least one doctor disputes the notion, saying that there's no link between chemical exposure and Kawasaki disease and that it does not cause seizures.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. oh well travolta has teh gay. That settles it.
you folks are sicker than the scientologists, and that is pretty damn sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. The point is that his caretaker was unqualified. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Oh so including the 'travolta's gay' crap was an accident?
Or is it that the nanny is unqualified to be a nanny because, uh, why exactly? What the hell are the qualifications for being a nanny? You've now elevated the nanny into some dubious position of 'caretaker' as if this was some certified healthcare provider position. This was the NANNY. There are no qualifications of being a nanny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #45
65. Connect the dots here
if a child is special needs then you cannot just hire a regular nanny you should be hiring someone that has worked with children that have special needs. It's not as though the family didn't have resources to find a child care provider that specializes in children with disabilities.

Would you be this cavalier about your child's care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. The child had a TEAM
of professionals and other people that monitored him. If only other special needs children and their families were as fortunate.

School teachers deal with special needs children as to child care workers. None are more qualified than the friend of the family who may have had a special bond with the child in question.

Does every parent with a special needs child need hired help to be considered less "cavalier"?

C'mon...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #68
74. Umm where did you get
your information? Right now there is conflicting accounts and if this child had a "team of professionals" why was he left dying alone in a bathroom for 10 hours? This according to the authorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #74
78. I don't know that I buy the ten hour time frame.
But, even if that's the case, most teens sleep for that amount of time. The child was found in the am, and was said to have gotten up in the NIGHT to use the bathroom. Most children are unsupervised for at least eight hours each evening when they turn in for the night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. Obviously John murdered the kid.
I mean it is clear as day.

I give up. I should never have responded to any of this garbage.

Can we attack the Catholics now? I really hate the Catholics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #78
83. You stated that
he had a team of professionals with him around the clock and he even had a baby monitor in his room so again even if he was in the bathroom for an hour how could that have happened if he was being watched so carefully?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #83
86. So he should have hired help watch him sleep
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 04:51 PM by mzmolly
in order for the parents not to be considered negligent?

The case against the Travolta's has become utterly !@$ ridiculous.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #86
90. Make up your mind
your not even keeping your opinions of these events straight.

You refuse to acknowledge that the child had autism

You refuse to acknowledge that this child's seizure was caused by Kawasaki disease

One minute you say he had a team of professionals the next you say you can't be sure he had more then one

Then you say that you don't buy the 10 hour time line

Then you say that his parent could have very well thought he was asleep

Then you say they can't be held accountable for not knowing that their child lay dying on the bathroom floor

The best of all is that you claim over and over again that this is a private family matter yet you started this thread

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #90
96. Make up my mind?
My opinion has not changed. It is as follows WE DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED UNTIL AN INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETE.

I refuse to acknowledge what isn't proven, true.

I refuse to acknowledge that no matter WHAT ailed this child, it was none of our business.

I refuse to pretend that I made claims I never did.

I refuse to suggest that a child with a team of caregivers is "neglected".

I refuse to blame parents for a tragic death because they have a different set of beliefs than I do.

...............................................................................................................................................


Feel free to carry on your with your bizarre vendetta. But don't expect not to be called on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #96
98. Well can you at least explain your own
waffling you seem to not be sure about anything nor do you seem familiar with comments that were made by the Travoltas regarding their son. Through all of this uncertainty on your part you continue to participate and create threads about Jett's death.

I haven't even mentioned Scientology in my posts because if this death could have been prevented through better care the parents should garner most of the blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #98
100. Show me where
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 05:10 PM by mzmolly
I waffled and I'll be glad to clarify your lack of understanding regarding my consistent commentary. I'm very familiar with the comments made by the Travolta's and I'm also familiar with the media attempt to milk this poor child's death.

Also this is my FIRST thread about Jett Travolta and my SECOND conversation. Perhaps given you have me confused with others this explains your confusion on my position?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #100
105. He's a public figure a movie star
and there behavior and comments have led to these questions that the media is bringing forth.

Also you must either not really know the Travolta's comments or you just choosing to ignore them because there is clearly something off about their statements regarding their son.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #105
109. I know the comments they've made.
And, I know that some have twisted the commentary in an attempt to spin a scandal out of a tragedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #109
118. So you don't find anything remotely
questionable about the Travolta's care of their son? None of their comments make just for a moment think "wait something seems a bit off"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #118
124. Nope.
I think they loved their son unconditionally and it was apparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #124
142. I'm not questioning their love
for their son I just think they were dangerously misguided and ill-informed. I also find it disturbing how some people elevate celebrities to such a level in which refuse to believe anything bad about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #142
153. Your thoughts are based solely upon wild
speculation at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #142
168. I find it disturbing how people are so willing to
'Frist' someone they've never met for shits and giggles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #168
174. As do I.
Especially in the case of a child. UGH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #86
93. Also he didn't die in his sleep
in his bed. My parents weren't constantly hovering over me while I was growing up but if I was passed out in the bathroom they would have known. You don't have to be a super parent to know that your child isn't in their bed or to not have heard someone fall in the bathroom. This stuff isn't rocket science
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #93
99. He got up to use
the bathroom after going to BED for the night.

My husband is a 6'3" tall diabetic who weighs over 200 pounds. He got up and collapsed one night breaking his shoulder. This happened at about 4AM and it was due to a diabetic seizure. We had a small home at the time and while he was in the next room when it happened. I did not hear him fall. I did not discover him until I got up for another reason. when I found him he was moaning and bleeding from the mouth from chewing the hell out of his tongue. He'd have died had I not been lucky that night.

I'm not sure what dark scenario you're suggesting here? Do you suggest the child was murdered? Do you suggest people in the home heard him fall and thought "let's let him die"? What are you specifically saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #99
102. First off
I'm sorry your husband broke his shoulder

but Jett collapsed around 11:30 at night so I can't imagine everyone in this house was sound asleep. Also the Travolta have said repeatedly that they keep very late hours (john stated he goes to bed around 7 A.M and Kelly around 3 A.M).

Again this isn't too difficult to follow I'm not suggesting the Travoltas murdered their son rather I just think that they weren't providing the proper medical care for their special needs son which may have directly or indirectly led to his death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #102
107. All speculation.
We don't know who went to bed when.

I think it's outrageous to suggest that they were not providing proper medical care without any evidence to support such a notion. In fact, the evidence points to the contrary.

The problem is that many are ASSUMING this is the case because of the religious beliefs of the family. This is simply wrong. Some are using the death of a child to attack Scientology. It's absolutely disgusting IMO.

I understand that Scientology is controversial but can't we have some compassion and wait for more information before we jump to conclusions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #107
110. Okay
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 05:38 PM by babythunder
then by all means provide the information in which the Travoltas talk about the care they provided to their son? And you keep accusing me of not providing information yet YOU HAVE TO YET TO PROVIDE AN EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT THIS BOY WAS PROVIDED PROPER CARE. Hell I would even take a quote from one of the parents just stating what kind of medical care their son is receiving?

Please show me where I even mentioned Scientology?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #110
127. how would anyone know that, other than the family and their support staff
or doctors? :shrug:


I agree with mzm that it probably isn't fair for anyone to speculate about parental care of children, medically fragile or otherwise, or parenting skills, without all the proper information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #127
133. Again your are off base
I'm not making my judgements on third party information but from statements that John Travolta and Kelly Preston have made. Please re-read my comments before assuming that I'm basing this strictly on speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #133
138. lots of parents are in denial about medical issues, illnesses and complex
diagnoses, not just folks who espouse Scientology (that is entirely different discussion - I disagree with most of their precepts that I have seen) - that isn't new. My point was that it's absurd, really, for anyone on a message board, regardless of their profession, not involved with the situation or with first-hand knowledge, to speculate.


I did read your comments. They started as quite relevant, and kind of devolved into bickering from there. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #138
148. Again I'm not speculating
I'm pointing to comments by John Travolta and Kelly Preston about their son and stating that I find something to be very off about their son's situation or at least the explanation they have given to the media.

If it was private family matter why make any comments at all just not say anything and deal with it privately. But they were the ones to come out and state that their son had Kawasaki disease which was caused by ingesting toxic chemicals, and of course they openly discussed their son' so-called cure through detoxification/purification. So please stop trying to spin my comments into something I picked out the air. Look you think everything is kosher that's your opinion but it isn't necessary for you to join the propaganda machine of the "Travoltas can do no wrong".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #148
155. Look the comments in question have been made over years.
These statements were not issued in relation to the death in question.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #110
132. You might want to try reading the OP?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #132
137. Oh you mean the medical diagnosis
given by the lawyer/friend? And you say other have questionable information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #137
140. And scuttlebutt information
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 06:15 PM by mzmolly
from bloggers diagnosing the child with autism and calling his death related and/or murder are more credible? I see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #140
149. What information did I provide
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 06:38 PM by babythunder
that ever stated that Jett was murdered? Now your just making yourself look like a jerk when you start pulling things out of your ass like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #149
156. You haven't
said this, but others have implied that the child was defective according to their religion and was being replaced by a new, improved human being.

I meant not to imply that you have said this. However you have suggested that the family is neglectful without one shred of evidence to support this conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #156
159. You have yet to provide one
link to anything with the exception the original link to the TMZ article. I've asked you repeatedly to show a quote or something that suggests that their son was receiving medical care not just the Scientology cures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #159
163. Depakote is not a scientology cure.
And TMZ broke the story initially.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #163
188. Which he was not on
so whats your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #149
158. Actually, she's not the jerk here.
And, if you are truly a pediatric ER physician, which I doubt from your posts, you had better educate yourself but quick on the long term effects of Kawasaki.

Yes, it's got an unknown etiology, but when Jett Travolta was two, it was becoming very, very common for the medical community to believe that this particular illness was brought about by the cleaning agents in carpet cleaners. I have a son Jett's age and I remember this well.

Another thing you are missing. No parent, EVER, is under any obligation to tell anyone the truth about their child's maladies, which is obviously something you missed in medical school. John and Kelly's desire not to disclose Jett's disabilities has no bearing on this.

There is no pharmacologic treatment for autism. Period.

Jett could have been one of the unlucky who suffered such extensively high fevers while battling the Kawasaki's that he sustained brain damage. It's rare, but it happens. I would expect an MD to know that, especially a pediatric MD.

Jett appeared to have ataxia which could also be a result of brain damage.

As far as the caretaker goes. It could have been something as simple as the fact that the child liked the guy. Additionally, Jett was a big kid. Perhaps the caretaker was physically able to slide him onto the floor during a seizure, roll him to the side and keep him comfortable until the seizing passed.

The Depakote could have harmed his liver which could be why they took him off it. It is extremely toxic to the liver. Again, I would expect an MD to know that.

Seizing and hitting his head in the bathtub is not all that uncommon. People die in the bathroom every day. This poor little guy happened to be the son of famous people which is why idiots on a message board are disparaging their care for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #158
166. Well said.
Thanks. :hi:

FYI ~ I've read that Kawasaki can harm the heart permanently as well and might have caused a heart attack? :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #166
167. Absolutely.
And, there are other 'viruses' out there that can destroy the heart in literally a 'heart beat'.

My husband has a work friend whose 3yo received a new heart a few weeks back because her heart was completely destroyed by a virus. By the time they got her to hospital, (they thought she had a bad cold) all traces of the virus were gone.

I posted about it in the lounge.

And, I have to say, I am astonished at the 'Fristing' of this child and his family. It's disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #158
170. Are you a medical doctor?
Also they don't have disclose anything but their son but why talk about it all if they wanted it to remain a private family matter (which I could totally understand). Almost everything I've read from medical professions regarding the Travoltas story have found it a bit off.

Don't listen to my opinions but here's a few comments from medical professionals.

Dr. Scott Alenick, a pediatric cardiologist in New Jersey, told FOXNews.com in an interview last year that Kawasaki disease is a condition that affects children, especially boys under the age of 5, and causes aneurysms and blockages in the blood vessels.

"We usually see it in the winter, but it can occur year-round,” Alenick, who has treated hundreds of cases of Kawasaki disease, said. “It is very unusual to die from Kawasaki disease.”

According to the American Heart Association, more than 4,000 cases of the disease are diagnosed annually in the United States. It occurs more often in boys of Japanese and Korean descent, but has been identified in children of all ethnicities and races, Alenick said.

While the condition is not preventable, it is treatable with most children recovering from the disease. In fact, less than 1 percent of Kawasaki cases are fatal.

The danger of Kawasaki syndrome is that it can cause large aneurysms in the blood vessels that feed blood to the heart, said Alenick.

“Kawasaki doesn’t come in degrees of severity, but it varies in that it may cause no aneurysms, small aneurysms, moderate aneurysms or giant aneurysms,” he said. “Giant aneurysms are more common in babies. But it’s the aneurysms that form in the vessels and the arteries that feed the heart that have the potential to cause a fatal heart attack.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #170
173. I have a PhD from UCONN in child and adolescent psychology
and I spent many, many long days in the ER on rotation .

And, you?

I don't see what bearing your cut and paste has on what I posted either.

and, Fox News? Almost as relevant as PageSix.

How about the CDC's page? Where the unknown etiology is acknowledged, but the fact that teenagers can suffer the ill effects of said disease is mentioned as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #173
181. So how often in your medical
rotations did children come in from deaths related Kawasaki disease? Also I never proclaimed to be giving a Professional Medical opinion nor do I pretend to be a medical professional because really anyone on the internet can claim to be anything so it's irrelevant what any of our so-called qualifications are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #181
183. Did you not upthread say you were a pediatric ER doctor?
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 07:17 PM by Midlodemocrat
And, fortunately, I didn't encounter any deaths from Kawasaki. That doesn't mean children didn't die, however. Mainly because the treatment of said is to bring down the fevers, reduce the edema, etc.

The LONG TERM effects are more of a concern.

And, I've been here long enough and met enough DUers, that my credentials are pretty solid.

Quote from you upthread:

I am a pediatric emergency room physician. We occasionally diagnose Kawasaki Disease (now properly called Kawasaki Syndrome) in young children. There are so many things wrong with the story of Jett's death that I am not sure where to start, but here's a try:


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #183
185. Pay close attention
I AM NOT A MEDICAL DOCTOR I was posting comment from other medical doctors who discussed the Kawasaki disease. Please pay better attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #185
194. THANK GOD!!!!
Although you might want to correct that. It's very misleading.

I was starting to worry about someone with your comprehension and writing skills treating children.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #194
197. As opposed to the doctor
who supports treatment of children that consists of "detoxification and purification" yea that's not too disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #197
199. Something of which you have no first hand knowledge.
Just gossip mongering on the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #199
201. I would think a medical professional
would be a little more responsible in this conversation. Really ss your love for John Travolta that strong that you cannot bring yourself to admit that this detox/purification process is just a magic potion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #201
209. Could you point to the post where I said I loved Travolta?
Thanks. :eyes:

Bow out now, you're outmatched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #170
177. Just because it's not immediately fatal
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 07:11 PM by mzmolly
doesn't mean that it can't eventually lead to death. If the child died as a result of heart or brain damage caused by the disease years ago, it will not be classified as a fatality related to the disease.

As to the child's other issues, mental retardation also leads to communication issues etc. Jett Travolta may have developed brain damage as a result of high fever (related to his bout with K.D.) for all we know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #177
179. I watched the video of that child in Paris with John.
It was pretty obvious to me that his parents loved him. I think that's kind of all that needs to be said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #179
182. I agree.
The child appeared adored and accepted. If only every child had such apparently loving parents.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #93
252. What if his bathroom is a quarter of a mile away from your bedroom?
Would you still hear him fall?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #83
87. anyone with kids knows
that even if you watch them around the clock, things can happen.

This child had a serious health condition, but instead of them institutionalizing him,
they had 3 nannies to watch him when they weren't with him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #65
72. I do not know one damn thing about the care this child did or did not receive
and neither do you. The 'fact' that a nanny was perhaps gay and male demonstrates nothing other than the alleged fact that a nanny was perhaps gay and male. You, little newbie, are not connecting dots you are jumping to conclusions. Shamelessly. Their son died. How about: 'leave them alone'? There will be an inquest. Actual facts regarding the death will be established. Then you can either continue your little vendetta ignoring the facts, or come back and tell me how wrong I was. Until then I suggest all of you Nancy Grace wannabees take a giant dose of Shut Up, for decencies sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #72
76. What exactly are you trying to
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 04:30 PM by babythunder
prove this issue concerns me because like I said if this poor child's death could have been prevented then all those responsible should be exposed. But what's your angle because you cannot be deluded enough to believe they read these forums particularly at a time like furthermore these questions are being asked on many websites. Even experts are questioning the validity of the Travolta' account of their son's illness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #76
80. I find the vendetta against the Travoltas based on their religious beliefs
revolting. In general when I see revolting crap posted here I object to, I respond with something like 'if you can't substantiate the revolting crap you are posting here, perhaps you ought to stop posting it'.

As you cannot substantiate the revolting crap you are posting here, perhaps you ought to stop posting it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #80
84. I posted quotes
from the parents that they stated in interviews. But I do think it's funny that all you've offered is your irrational anger about people discussing this and not facts of your OWN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #80
101. Bravo
once again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #80
187. I find you characterization ..
.... of Scientiology as a "religion" revolting. It's no more a religion than the Manson family.

As for what happened with his son, well I just don't know, and it's not up to me to find out. I will say that I've taken Depakote for about two weeks and I informed my dr to find another drug. NASTY stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #80
253. Good job!
I concur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #42
61. I'm not sure we can assert that?
He had more than one caretaker as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. shame on you
what the fuck is "gawker.com" and why post a bunch of gossip about a family who just lost a son.

You disgust me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. No, shame on the parents for letting someone
so obviously unqualified care for their sick son. This is a legitimate issue no matter what. If these people were not celebrities the authorities would be all over them. If you were a millionaire would you let a photographer take care of your special needs child?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. your source is gawker.com
I'll withhold judgement until the investigation is complete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #43
129. I have worked with many families with special needs or medically fragile
children.


Most of them had no or few additional resources to hire staff/caregivers for their kids, but often depended on the state/MA for additional supports. They did the best they could, with medical, schooll and other supports. I think it really depends on the severity of each child's medical needs, and we have no way of knowing the facts of this situation, or diagnoses. Most authorities would accept that the parents were doing the best they could with that particular child's needs, until there was proof otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #35
53. That isn't the time to ask those kinds of questions
He just lost his son. You may not like Travolta, but asking that question is as bad as those reporters who have to interview people right after they have experienced a personal disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. There is a difference
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 03:43 PM by babythunder
a natural disaster cannot be prevented but if this child's death could then it just be investigated to the fullest.

I just HATE when I read in the news about a child whose death could have been prevented. Whether it's because they found their parent's unlocked guns, or because they lacked the proper access to medicine, or because they died of alcohol poisoning etc. This world has entirely too many senseless deaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #53
126. FWIW, I'm a huge fan of John Travolta.
I just think this is a big white elephant in the room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #35
56. The family never said he died
as a result of a seizure related to Kawasaki Disease. Sheesh, what total garbage from Gawker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
69. Losing a child is the worst hell on earth a parent can experience
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #69
79. I sincerely hope
you have never experienced such a hell ZombyWoof.

:(

I simply can't imagine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #79
108. I have not
I cannot imagine, either. I can only offer sympathy and sorrow - and hope that it is not presumptious of me to state that it must be the worst thing a parent could experience. It just strikes me as a fundamental truth: No parent should outlive their child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Torem Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
89. That was my suspicion from the get-go
Similar to what happen to Anna Nicole Smith's son.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #89
92. Did you even read it? He was off the med (depakote) when he died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
94. Interesting. However, that doesn't explain why the child was left alone ...
... for nearly 10 hours (http://www.aolcdn.com/tmz_documents/0102_travolta_incident.pdf ) with or without medicine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babythunder Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #94
95. Didn't you hear the
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 05:06 PM by babythunder
authorities have a vendetta to meet out against Scientology so surely that 10 hour time line is made up OR

better yet how can a parent know that their child is passed out for 10 hours in the bathroom.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #95
112. The authorities
haven't made claims of neglect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #94
103. This is debatable. However he is said to have gone to bed
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 05:16 PM by mzmolly
for the night. He was found in the am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
np33 Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #103
106. Then why
have caretakers for your son if they don't even check to see if he made it to bed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #106
111. He did make it to bed. At 6PM. He said wasn't feeling well.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
np33 Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #111
115. Do you have a link
to this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #111
125. "He said" Are you sure about that? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #125
130. I'm as sure as I can be
while not being in the room with the kid, yes. This presumably is according to several witnesses.

Why not ask those diagnosing the child with autism and saying his parents refused proper treatment if they're "sure"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #130
147. No one outside the cult was allowed near the child.
Which is why he was "diagnosed" and "treated" the way he was.

But, you're right, there needs to be a thorough investigation as to what really went on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #147
157. More
unfounded speculation I'm afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #157
193. You're correct-- similar to the "speculation" that says the child had Kawasaki Disease.
More needs to be known before anything that's been said can be believed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #193
198. I remember when Jett Travolta was diagnosed with KS
I have a son the same age. Kelly and John were actually very vocal in the mid 90s warning people about this. At the time, it was believed that the carpet cleaning agents DID cause KS.

Now the etiology is listed as unknown because it is still a relatively new disease process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #198
200. Yes, and like all science corrections are made as more is discovered. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #193
204. The child had a dx of Kawasaki Disease.
That is not speculation.

I'm glad you agree that we need to wait for the facts. THAT is all I ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #204
210. We should wait for facts a not repeat unfounded speculation like the diagnosis of KD. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #210
211. That part is not unfounded.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #210
213. It was 14 years ago. I clearly remember it. What makes
you think the dx is unfounded? John and Kelly made plenty of noise back then about what was perceived as the dangers of carpet cleaning chemicals.

I don't understand your point here? It seems as though you are just itching to pin it on Scientology, when there is a better than average chance that their religion had nothing to do with this.


People hit their heads and die in the bathroom every day. This child just happened to have famous parents, hence it's news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #213
217. scientology prefers you refrain from using seizure medicine- and the travoltas did refrain
after trying it (for who knows how long really).
their only self described preferred treatment was vitamins and saunas, goobelty gook from L Ron himslef- and that's pretty fucked up. That's a pretty clear connection to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #217
218. If they were willing to try the the depakote, it would appear to me
that they were willing to go against Scientology to do what was best for their son.

My guess would be, and of course, it's just a guess, that the child's liver enzymes were being affected by the depakote and they chose to take him off the seizure meds rather than destroy his liver which would kill him. Seizures are rarely fatal; it's usually another issue like aspiration or hitting of the head.

Additionally, depakote is rarely the drug of first choice to treat seizures; dilantin is. If they were treating him with depakote, there's a better than average chance that they tried dilantin with less than satisfactory results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #218
219. have you ever heard of patients who have very extreme seizures opting not to medicate
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 09:00 PM by bettyellen
at all? wouldn't he then be getting other tretement? it will be interesting to see how agressively they worked to treat this kid, I really hope they did all they could.
But the total lack of seizure meds sounds odd, but starts to make more senese if you know about the insane medical dvice that comes out of the mouths of scientologists. You know if you don't belive something will wotk- you tend not to give it a shot, and if you believe the opposite- well there goes the Mom bragging about healing him with vitamins, and sauna etc..which is really just horseshit.
at any rate, i would take anything they say with a grain of salt, we're all inferior beings to Scientologists and they don;t feel the need to answer to us. I already sawed veiled threats of lawsuits (defamation) coming from the Travolta camp.. and medical statement coming from the lawyer- how weird is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #219
220. I actually treated some patients with such severe seizure disorders
that medications didn't work. It appears to me that the Travoltas, in giving Jett depakote, were truly trying to do what was best for their son.

Anticonvulsant medications are like anti-psychotics or other neuro drugs. Trial and error, trial and error.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #220
223. but they weren't giving it to him, and so we don;t know that they had the strength to go against
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 09:24 PM by bettyellen
Scientology's dictates for once and give the medicen a fair shot. for all we know, they took the script home and tossed out the pills. if they are practising scientologists, they don;t believe anyone knows better than L Ron and they do not answer to the likes of you and me or non scientology doctors.
it is what it is, and we will probably never know the truth of it now. thanks for your perspective, it's sad any way you look at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #223
228. According to the OP, the child had been taking depakote.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #228
246. the lawyer says he had been taken of fof it. not sure when.. but i saw it added
that the lawyer says he was on it for a year... he goes into much more detail about the siezures themselves- sounds like the lawyer was briefed by a doctor in detail. very odd. never heard of a lawyer giving out this kind of detailed medical info this instead of a doctor- have you?? anyway- they seem to be giving this all straight to TMZ, if you're curious.
as much as i distrust scientologists, you have to admire how they cross their t's. i'm telling you, i wouldnlt be suprised to get a supenea from those suckers myslef, LOL. JT's lawyers have already used the word defamed today. ouch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #147
169. Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #147
192. I wouldn't be surprised if the attorneys
who are doing all the talking are Scientologists as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #192
225. Lawyers are like the kings of Scientology - they are what keeps ex members in line and keeps
"defamatory" meaterial out of the public eye. they want no one to read or belive that Theaan bullshit until they are all bbut broken because they'd be laughed off the planet if it was more widely known. That's how they survive- lawsuits and more lawsuits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #111
190. By many of the accounts I have read, Jett was
uncommunicative. I doubt he ever said anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #190
233. Granted he may not have been highly
verbal but that doesn't mean he never spoke or communicated his feelings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #103
144. I have not heard this, however since you say it's debatable, perhaps ...
... what's needed is a thorough investigation?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #144
160. I agree.
Regardless of the circumstances a complete investigation is required.

Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
113. It is truly tragic when any parent buries their child. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
119. I lost a friend from college with the same kind of seizures
He was on Depakote as well. He went to bed one night and never woke up. His parents believe he had a seizure in his sleep. Had he been standing when that seizure came on, I would presume he wouldn't have survived it. This sounds very similar to the Travolta family's experience. Tragic circumstances, the family has my sympathies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
122. Seizure drugs are icky.
This was no easy choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
146. My son takes Depakote
He takes it for Bipolar mania
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #146
162. Drug of choice, usually.
I would assume, and you know what happens when one assumes, that Jett Travolta didn't do well on dilantin, which is the drug of first choice for seizures, especially grand mal ones. Hence the depakote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #146
180. I have a family
member who has the same issue. Couldn't tolerate the side effects of Depakote so she now takes Lithium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #180
186. JMHO, but in treating the bipolar
I always had more success with Lithium. Sometimes the oldest drugs work the best. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #186
206. Seems that way in this case?
With other meds she has become a drooling zombie (her description). She doesn't like that of course. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #206
212. Unfortunately, the drugs to 'level' out the bipolar have
some unpleasant side effects.

Additionally, many folks who are bi-polar don't mind the 'manic' phase, so they go off the drug or drug cocktail, and then they crash. It's a real challenge to get bi-polar folks to stay on a medication regimen. Unfortunately, the pharmaceutical community hasn't hit upon the right compounding.

I find it very sad. Mental illness in this country is so under treated and so many go by the wayside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #212
222. I have witnessed
what you speak of. My relative has gone off her meds for "energy" to "get stuff done". :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #222
227. Seriously, though, doesn't it sound somewhat appealing?
1-2 weeks of super, duper energy?

Of course, the crash that comes afterwards is horrible, but man, just think what we could do with that kind of burst of energy. I'm not surprised that so many patients are non compliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #227
231. Indeed
I understand the appeal LOL. Unfortunately, the super energy is often followed by delusions for my rele. OY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
196. self-edit
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 07:29 PM by WhaTHellsgoingonhere
self-edit

I see the title is not yours. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
237. Who is there source on the Depakote? The lawyers of the people in question?
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 10:48 PM by originalpckelly
As we all know, the best source of information is the lawyers of a person who may have something to hide. It's not like I should be suspicious that their own lawyers are full of shit.

Things don't sound right here. You're telling me the kid was on a medication that also has psychiatric use?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #237
239. The source is a scientology lawyer
you do the math. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #239
242. Link?
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #237
241. According to the article, the child was on medication
that stopped working and caused liver damage. Not at all uncommon with this type of medication. Additionally, medications often times have more than one use.

Also, I'm not sure when attorneys became villainous here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
245. I'M OUT.
"ENJOY" the continued discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
250. My cousin died from his meds, seizure in a pool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC