Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So has Rove been subpoenaed yet?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 03:58 PM
Original message
So has Rove been subpoenaed yet?
Yesterday, people were saying today was going to be the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm also curious about this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Both the house and the senate have authorized subpoenas
But they haven't been issued or served yet....

I think they will probably come after testimony next thursday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I believe the "Justice" Dept would serve subpoenas. Duh...who controls
'Justice"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. actually they can be served by Congressional staff
or by US Marshals. WHile the US Marshal service is part of the DOJ, I know of no circumstance in which the Marshal service refused to carry out its duty to serve a congressional subpoena.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. A document server could do it really. Anyone could serve notice
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 06:37 PM by hang a left
upon the party.

And since they all probably have attorneys by now, they can be served.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. My point is that who can make them show up? Can't they just stay in the White House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oh OK
If they don't show up I would imagine a bench warrant would be issued. They wouldn't be leaving the WH for a while I imagine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. OK. If it goes that far reasonable people would see that they are trying to
undo the justice system. All we need is a judge brave enough to issue the bench warrant over the demands of the AG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. if they don't show up, that is what starts the contempt process
The mechanism for enforcing a congressional subpoena involves the following steps:
First, the committee issuing the committee votes to hold the person defying the subpoena in contempt of congress.
Second, the entire House (or if its a Senate committee, the entire senate), has to vote to hold the person in contempt.
Third, the contempt citation is referred to the US Attorney's office in DC, which would then be expected to bring the matter before a grand jury, obtain an indictment, and seek to press criminal charges under a provision of the federal criminal code that provides for penalties (I think its a year in jail) for contempt of Congress.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. As long as the US Attorney's in the DC office complies, OK. This is where
my concern is: Gonzales controls US attorneys. If the US attorney has guts and does the job, things will work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. There's something about Linda Sanchez in Raw story?
what is she doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC