Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seven Executive Orders to Launch the Obama Agenda: With The Stroke Of The Presidential Pen

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:27 PM
Original message
Seven Executive Orders to Launch the Obama Agenda: With The Stroke Of The Presidential Pen



Seven Executive Orders to Launch the Obama Agenda

Since the great whirlwind of policymaking that defined President Franklin Roosevelt's first 100 days in office, new Presidents have recognized the importance of launching their administrations with a package of measures that reflect their top policy priorities and that set a tone for their administrations. Much of President Barack Obama’s agenda will require new legislation, but a report from the Center for Progressive Reform proposes a series of Executive Orders for the new President that would allow him to jumpstart his agenda with nothing but the stroke of his pen.


Seven Executive Orders

Each of the Orders proposed in the report, Protecting Public Health and the Environment by the Stroke of a Presidential Pen, directs agencies of the government to take specific steps that would make a real-world difference. The Orders address:

1. Climate Change. Require all federal agencies to measure, report, and reduce their carbon footprints. The federal government now accounts for 1.4 percent of the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions.

2. Climate Change. Direct all federal agencies to consider the climate change-related implications of their actions as part of their obligations under the National Environmental Protection Act. If the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration had considered climate change when fixing mileage standards for light trucks in 2008, it might have produced considerably more stringent standards.

3. Protecting Children from Toxics. Require all federal agencies to develop plans implementing an affirmative agenda to protect children from toxics, to account for the unique attributes of children when conducting risk assessments, and to stop discounting prospective benefits for children and future generations when conducting cost-benefit analyses. Current policies too often fail to account for children’s exposure to toxics.

4. Environmental Justice. Clarify key terminology for understanding environmental justice issues and require all federal agencies to conduct meaningful analyses of the environmental justice impacts of their actions, undertake steps to ameliorate environmental injustices, and commit to carrying out an affirmative environmental agenda. Current executive branch policy ignores the ways in which environmental hazards are disproportionately visited upon minority communities.

5. Transparency in Government. Restore the presumption of disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, limit the ability of agencies to avoid the transparency provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and introduce greater transparency into the regulatory review process conducted by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Open government was a victim of the Bush Administration, all too often compromising the integrity of the regulatory process and denying citizens the right to scrutinize what was being done in their name.

6. Victims’ Right to Sue. Establish a strong presumption against federal agency preemption of more protective state health and environmental laws and institute a rigorous procedure for agencies to follow in order to overcome that presumption. The Bush Administration has frequently asserted that its regulations – usually weak – preempt victims’ right to sue for damages.

7. Public Lands. Establish the goal of ecological integrity as the baseline for making public land management decisions, revoke two Bush-era Executive Orders that improperly prioritized the goals of energy development over the statutory goals of sustainable land use, and broaden opportunities for public participation in land management decisions. The nation’s public lands need careful stewardship, but the Bush Administration policy of permitting overexploitation has degraded the lands and the services, values, and benefits they provide.

http://www.progressivereform.org/penstroke.cfm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do executive orders not have to garner congressional approval?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We got a ton of them under Bush without Congressional approval
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. For the weekend crew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Nope, they are essentially internal memos
Edited on Fri Jan-09-09 11:27 PM by tritsofme
that direct executive branch agencies.

Stroke of the pen, law of the land, pretty cool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 13th 2024, 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC