Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The New Deal prolonged the Great Depression.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EconomicLiberal Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:10 PM
Original message
The New Deal prolonged the Great Depression.
The only thing that saved us from the Great Depression was World War II.

(this is the story line, according to the far right).

Does anybody else find it funny that conservatives, albeit indirectly, admit that government spending got us out of the Great Depression (war bonds), which is contrary to the theory that they've tried to shove down our throats for 60 years (that government prolonged the Great Depression)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hypocrisy knows no bounds among the GOP
And ignorance is not quantifiable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. "ignorance is not quantifiable" -- but there's a symbol for it that looks like an eight lying down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Quite right, sir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. The far right.
Would they be the ones who supported the economic mumbo-jumbo that got us into this mess? So having gotten us in, we should reasonably expect they have a suggestion for getting us out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetrusMonsFormicarum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I, for one
am done with any suggestions they may offer.

As far as I'm concerned, they can all go home and wait for the doorbell (subpoenas being served) or the splintering front door (Fed raid).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. So they are for a completely centrally planned economy? That's quite a change from the old RW
WWII gave us a COMPLETELY centrally planned economy much like the USSR. The govt told industry what to build and how much and how to pay their labor. Citizens were told how much they could consume of key commodities right down to dietary staples and prosecuted for evading the rules. While I always knew the RW was as hostile to the notion of civil liberties as Joey Stalin, I never thought they would also go for state control of industry.

I guess the times are a-changin'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. a 1994 UCLA Economics paper
I read it, was worthless

Basically saying high wages held up unemployment rates, prolonging the depression.

The high wages were supposed to have been caused by National Recovery Administration regulations

The NRA was, however, declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court before any of its regulations could take hold.

The argument in the paper was that the mere possibility that the NRA could raise wages was enough to cause the effect

Someone better versed in econ needs to publish a critique of this paper for public consumption
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. They're definitely wrong on the first count and partially wrong on the second..
1. The New Deal did in fact start pulling us out of the Depression.

2. It wasn't just our spending on war that pulled us out. it was the rest of civilization's destruction which made us wealthy by comparison.

However the difference between using those two dynamics in moral terms as a matter of economic policy is astronomical, whereas the first builds the people and society up, the second only tears them down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. WWII proved FDR's recovery plan was too small.
FDR really only spent 2-3% of 1929 GDP on recovery programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'd love to know how
Also, just because the economy took time to recover doesn't mean the New Deal did not work. It's like driving at 80 and saying the brakes didn't work because you did not stop immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Spending ended the Great Depression.
We just happened to spend money on building up the military, but it was spending.

Here's hoping we get out of this depression by spending on infrastructure and cities and healthcare.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Don't forget about he banks and the auto-makers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I don't remember President-elect Barack Obama authorizing those expenditures. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. In WWII, there was a 94% tax rate on people making over $200K.
That's not a typo. I said 94%.

Apparently, Republicans think taxing the rich into oblivion is the way to economic salvation. Who woulda thunk it?

:evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 13th 2024, 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC