Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conspiracy Theory Appears Less Likely in Fatal Crash

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 08:30 PM
Original message
Conspiracy Theory Appears Less Likely in Fatal Crash
NTSB investigators who examined the wreckage report there were no apparent anomalies with the control system and the engine appeared to have been developing power on impact.

http://www.flyingmag.com/news/1295/conspiracy-theory-appears-less-likely-in-fatal-crash.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mugweed Donating Member (939 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. When I performed inspections for the State
Edited on Fri Jan-09-09 08:48 PM by Mugweed
I used to end my reports with "No violations were observed at the time of inspection". What that meant was that I didn't see anything at that particular time of the visit, not meant to be a sign-off that this particular business was OK until I visited again 10-14 months later or nothing has ever been in violation. The NTSB statement says to me "We didn't see anything obvious, and have no reason to take a closer look to uncover any less obvious stuff." I did very thorough inspections during my tenure. They became a benchmark because I went beyond the obvious and looked at ways that we could be fooled. When I said no violations were observed, I had actually covered all angles. Did the NTSB do the same?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
argonchloride Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The information posted is from their -preliminary- report, it is by no means the final one.
Are there some elements of it that you find suspicious? There seems to be no dissent from the evidence that he asked for and attempted a 360 degree turn in the middle of an instrument approach which is an incredibly stupid thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemical Bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. I thought that the usual way to cause a plane crash...
was to readjust the ground signal so that the plane comes in too low. The plane hits the ground short of the runway, the ground signal is put back to normal, and everybody wonders why the crash. I'm not a pilot, so I don't know the specifics of this. IIRC, I read about this in the book "Compromised" by Terry Reed. He was describing the crash of Ron Brown, Clinton's Commerce Secretary, in 1996. BTW, no, he doesn't think that Bill Ordered it. Anyway, I thought about this when Wellstone's plane went down.

Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC