http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/sunday/la-oe-rutten10-2009jan10,1,147265.columnThe failure of our 401(k)s
The accounts were never meant to entirely fund retirements, and the financial crisis has hit many hard.
Tim Rutten
January 10, 2009
As a consequence, there's been little discussion of the way in which this economic implosion has exposed the utter failure of the now-ubiquitous 401(k) retirement accounts. In fact, the entire 401(k) system looks increasingly like the sort of bait-and-switch con relished by the Bernie Madoff's of the world.
As Robyn Credico, a leading consultant on pensions, told the Wall Street Journal this week, "This is the biggest test that the 401(k) plan has seen to date, and it has failed."
Here's the problem: In 1978, when Congress amended the Internal Revenue Code to include Section 401(k), it envisioned the provision mainly as a way for workers to supplement their companies' traditional defined-benefit pension plans and Social Security. (Secondarily, it also was a nifty hideaway where highly paid executives could shelter income from taxes.)
Nobody at the time envisioned the 401(k) as something on which people would rely for their retirement.-----------------
The problem is that, since the markets' peak in October 2007, our 401(k)s have lost a collective $1 trillion in value. That's fully a third of the value of all 401(k)s. The picture is actually worse than that because another $1 trillion has been stripped from people who lost or changed jobs and rolled their 401(k)s into individual retirement accounts.