Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oklahoma First To Push Flat Earth Legislation in 2009

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:23 AM
Original message
Oklahoma First To Push Flat Earth Legislation in 2009
http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=6492

The National Center for Science Education finds that Oklahoma is the first state to have an evolution bill this year:

Senate Bill 320 (document), prefiled in the Oklahoma Senate and scheduled for a first reading on February 2, 2009, is apparently the first antievolution bill of 2009. Entitled the “Scientific Education and Academic Freedom Act,” SB 320 would, if enacted, require state and local educational authorities to “assist teachers to find more effective ways to present the science curriculum where it addresses scientific controversies” and permit teachers to “help students understand, analyze, critique, and review in an objective manner the scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses of existing scientific theories pertinent to the course being taught.” The only topics specifically mentioned as controversial are “biological evolution, the chemical origins of life, global warming, and human cloning.”

Unsurprisingly, SB 320 is a further instance of the “academic freedom” strategy for undermining the teaching of evolution; as NCSE’s Glenn Branch and Eugenie C. Scott recently wrote in their article “The Latest Face of Creationism,” published in the January 2009 issue of Scientific American, “‘Academic freedom’ was the creationist catchphrase of choice in 2008: the Louisiana Science Education Act was in fact born as the Louisiana Academic Freedom Act, and bills invoking the idea were introduced in Alabama, Florida, Michigan, Missouri and South Carolina …” Of these, only the Louisiana bill was passed and enacted, over protests from the scientific, educational, and civil liberties communities.

The sponsor of the Oklahoma bill is Randy Brogdon (R-District 34), who was a cosponsor in 2006 of House Concurrent Resolution 1034. If enacted, HCR 1034 would have encouraged “the State Board of Education and local boards of education to revise the recommended academic curriculum content standards in science to ensure that, upon graduation, all students can accomplish the following: 1. Use of the scientific method to critically evaluate scientific theories including, but not limited to, the theory of evolution; and 2. Use relevant scientific data to assess the validity of those theories and to formulate arguments for and against those theories.” HCR 1034 died in committee in May 2006.

Oklahomans concerned about SB 320 are encouraged to get in touch with Oklahomans for Excellence in Science Education, a non-profit educational organization that promotes the education of the public about the methods and values of science and advocates excellence in the science curriculum. As OESE explains on its website, “The formation of OESE was prompted by the attempts in the Oklahoma State Textbook Committee in 1999 to diminish the teaching of evolution by the introduction of creationist textbook disclaimers to be inserted into any textbook used in public schools that discussed evolution. There have been bills introduced almost every year since 1999 for legislation that would allow teaching creationism in science courses; OESE has opposed all such attempts.”

(Hat tip to Stranger Fruit)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Stop teh stew pid it hurts...
...why don't these fucktards just stay in their own ignorant little worlds and leave the rest of us the fuck alone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. because if they can influence a country they empower their delusion
that they are "right" and everyone else is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Blankety Blanking Blank FREEDOM Act
When any act has the term "Freedom", RUN FOR THE HILLS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Oklahoma is SO backwards.
I really feel sorry for Oklahoma and its people.

They are so pathetically ignorant and able to
be manipulated...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ezgoingrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hey!!
Not everyone from Oklahoma fits such a dare I say "ignorant" sweeping generality! Easy, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Oklahoma - a good place to be FROM.
Most of the smart Okies I know had to leave in order to keep their sanity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Note my handle....
Still there are a lot of Okies who stayed behind to bring the state into the 21st century. It's a tough battle when people vote against their best interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't see what's so threatening about teaching BOTH (cough) SIDES of these "questions".
Like, there's the side that is backed up through physical evidence and rigorous scientific methodology, and the side that someone just fucking made up off the top of their head.

Two sides. Teach both!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kick and rec, but ...
... you should change your first sentence to say "anti-evolution" bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShenandoahAspen Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oklahoma -- home state of Toby Keith.
Edited on Sat Jan-10-09 06:32 PM by ShenandoahAspen
And the only state in which EVERY county voted for McPalin. 'Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. As you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Uhhh Toby Keith voted for Obama????
Try again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. It took that dumbass redneck a long time to get to the point where he wasn't ...
... as stupid as he was brought up to be.

Also, don't forget, this is at state-level. Keith could have voted for Obama and Randy Brogdon (or one of the local morans who will undoubtedly support it).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShenandoahAspen Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Actually, he probably voted for McCain
According to an article on CMT.com he changed parties from Democratic to Independent and said he would probably vote for McCain because of Palin.

http://www.cmt.com/news/country-music/1596198/toby-keith-registering-as-independent-voter.jhtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stubtoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. I see Global Warming and Human Cloning are also on on their "controversial" science topics list.
Sure looks like Religion In Politics to me, but hell, what do I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think what I hate the most about this stuff...
is that I'm somehow not allowed to collapse in the derisive laughter when the Flat Earthers start blathering this drivel. Why am I required to "show respect" to this medieval bullshit?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC