Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Correction on the Wade-Cheney MZM Inc. contract:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:22 PM
Original message
Correction on the Wade-Cheney MZM Inc. contract:
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 11:38 PM by originalpckelly
I'm looking at this database with all these contracts in it, and it says in the contract description that there were:
"Major Product or Service Code D: Automatic data processing and telecom. services
Product or Service Code D302: ADP Systems Development Services
Principal NAICS Code 541511: Custom Computer Programming Services"


It just lists the "EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT" as the recipient of the services, and technically Cheney's Office of The Vice President, is included in the EOP, so this fact works for it.

If there is a discrepancy between what Cheney's office received and what was listed on record, that might be a problem, I am fairly confident 18 USC Section 1001 would apply in general to a fraudulent record submitted to the executive branch because the law says:

"...whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive...branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully...makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry..."

So if Cheney said it was for a different product than it turned out it was, that law applies. I have the Wade-Wilkes-Foggo indictments, so I'll work on looking to flesh this out more, and come back with what I think I've found.

Here's the website with the MZM contract for the EOP:
http://www.fedspending.org/fpds/fpds.php?fiscal_year=2002&parent_id=197275&sortby=u&datype=T&reptype=r&database=fpds&detail=4&submit=GO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hi originalpckelly
I know you've been looking into the gwb43.com operation, and I wanted to add this tidbit from a story about MZM/Cunningham:

"In the fall of 2002, Burtt asked a team of private contractors, including MZM, to evaluate CIFA's unclassified and classified networks, installed by MZM's prime contractor, Gray Hawk. Defense Department rules require that even its unclassified day-to-day business must be handled within the Pentagon's secure .mil domain. But the evaluation team learned that Gray Hawk had built a .net commercial-type intranet instead."

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060917/25mzm_8.htm

It sort of reminds me about how White House emails were sent on a commercial intranet instead through gwb43. If the Republicans did it w/CIFA, it helps lend credence to the idea that they routed White House mail through a commercial network as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks!!!!
:hi:

It definitely does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. good for you. Thank-you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You know what, MZM, Wade's company was located up the street from the Watergate Hotel...
It's a number of blocks away, but it's still on New Hampshire Avenue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. oh god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think I'm going to do something tomorrow...
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 12:07 AM by originalpckelly
I have something here that I want a reaction to, and I guess the only way to get it is to contact the white house.

I suppose I'll call the white house operator and ask for the white house press office. I'm going to confront them about this contract, and the fact that a few days later it says Michael Wilkes indictment that Mitchell Wade, the owner of MZM purchased the Dukester for $140,000, the exact amount of the contract.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Run it by someone you trust first....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grizmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is just a gut instinct, but
something about that $140k figure bothers me. It's almost as if *someone* wanted this link to be uncovered. I mean, they could have altered the figure just slightly so that the boat price and the contract were not *both* $140... unless of course they are just so arrogant that getting caught just never entered the equation.

But that little factoid about MZM being previously engaged in surveillance equipment, and the suggestion that *what if* they provided "bugged" office furniture to Darth... just keeps knocking around in my head...

Was this some sort of set up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC