Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Sanders Slams Smithsonian Sign's Spin on Iraq and Sept.11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 10:52 AM
Original message
Sen. Sanders Slams Smithsonian Sign's Spin on Iraq and Sept.11
Vt. senator asks Smithsonian to change sign next to Bush portrait

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., wants the Smithsonian to change the wording of a sign next to a portrait of President Bush that says his time in the White House was "marked by a series of catastrophic events" including the "the attacks on September 11, 2001, that led to wars in Afghanistan and Iraq," AP reports.

Sanders wants curators to make it clear that the war in Iraq had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks.

"You can agree or disagree with the war," he tells The Burlington Free Press. "I simply think it's important that history not be rewritten. Politicians spin all the time, but a wonderful national institution like the National Portrait Gallery should stick to the facts."

http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2009/01/vt-senators-ask.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. The attacks did lead to the Iraq war...
because it was used, repeatedly, as the excuse to invade.

So the sign is technically correct, but should be amended to reflect the complete truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I agree, actually.
I'm not sure a simple sign could encapsulate the truth, really, but maybe something along the lines of "...the attacks on September 11, 2001, that led to war in Afghanistan and was used as a false reason for the war in Iraq."

History should grasp the whole truth of the matter, including the false pretensions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Go Bernie!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. It also led to FREEDOM FRIES™.
Edited on Mon Jan-12-09 11:04 AM by Mika



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. King of the Cafeteria
If that was my Congressional legacy, I'd be really, really, really, really embarassed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Way to go Bernie! K&R
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. The sign is knowingly misleading in its narrow view.
Here's to you, Bernie. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. Agreed they should "should stick to the facts"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. Hmmm. The attacks DID lead to war in Afghanistan and Iraq. The war in Iraq had everything to do
with the 9/11 attacks, because the attacks were used as an excuse to go to war. Iraq had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks, but the war in Iraq had a lot to do with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. As I read this "sign" that people from all over the world will view at the Smithsonian...
"the attacks on September 11, 2001, that led to wars in Afghanistan and Iraq," it is giving Bush an "out" as to why he went to Iraq. The war in Iraq had nothing to do with Sept. 11 attacks except what Bush and his cohorts manufactured into it.

Remember this - where Bush admits it himself?

Bush: No Iraq link to 9/11 found
President says Saddam had ties to al-Qaida, but apparently not to attacks


By SCOTT SHEPARD
COX NEWS SERVICE

WASHINGTON -- President Bush, having repeatedly linked Saddam Hussein to the terrorist organization behind the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, said yesterday there is no evidence that the deposed Iraqi leader had a hand in those attacks, in contrast to the belief of most Americans.

The president's comments came in response to a reporter's question about Vice President Dick Cheney's assertion Sunday on NBC's "Meet The Press" program that Iraq was the "geographic base" of the terrorists behind the attacks on New York and Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. I thought there may be more to this story - Boy was I right - take a look! GOP cronyism 1 more time
Monday, March 26, 2007

Smithsonian Head Resigns - A Very Republican Scandal

http://cernigsnewshog.blogspot.com/2007/03/smithsonian-head-resigns-very.html

The AP today only ran this tiny report:

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Smithsonian's top official, Lawrence Small, has resigned amid criticism about his expenses.

on their news ticker. It's gone already, replaced by another news story. But it's well worth hauling this one out for a good look.

His departure follows the Washington Post's revelations a week ago:

Internal Smithsonian documents offer a glimpse into what one senator called the "Dom Perignon" lifestyle of the taxpayer-supported institution's chief official, who turned in a $15,000 receipt for the replacement of French doors at his home and spent $48,000 for two chairs, a conference table and upholstery for his office suite.

Smithsonian Secretary Lawrence M. Small's spending has been the subject of intense public scrutiny after The Washington Post published details last month from a confidential inspector general's report delving into his $2 million in housing and office expenses over the past six years.

...Small spent nearly $160,000 on the redecoration of his offices in the institution's main building on the Mall shortly after he took the helm of the world's largest museum system in 2000. The expenses include $4,000 for two chairs from the English furniture-maker George Smith, $13,000 for a custom-built conference table and $31,000 for Berkeley stripe upholstery.

Small has also received $1.15 million in housing allowances over a six-year period in return for agreeing to use his 6,500-square-foot home in Woodley Park for Smithsonian functions. To justify those expenses, Small has submitted receipts for $152,000 in utility bills, $273,000 in housekeeping services and $203,000 in maintenance charges, including $2,535 to clean a chandelier. The home-repair invoices show $12,000 for upkeep and service on his backyard swimming pool, including $4,000 to replace the lap pool's natural gas heater and pump. The office expenses were permitted under Smithsonian policies and procedures, and the housing allowance was part of Small's employment agreement. The $160,000 in office renovations are part of $846,000 in total office expenses Small filed between 2000 and 2005.

About $90,000 was found by the institution's inspector general to be unauthorized, including charter jet travel and transactions that "might be considered lavish or extravagant," The Post reported last month. In addition to the $90,000, about $28,000 in expenses had insufficient or no supporting documents. These were variously labeled as "reimbursement," "one-time vendor" and "Smithsonian petty cash," documents show.

A Senate committee had been investigating Snow's expenditure, but obviously he decided to quit now, before that invesigation concluded. USA Today reports:

On Thursday, the Senate approved freezing a proposed $17 million funding increase for the Smithsonian, citing Small's excessive compensation and spending. He was to earn $915,698 this year in compensation. He won't be given a severance package, said Patty Stonesifer, board co-chairwoman.
"Having spent countless days … promoting the interests of the institution and having contributed over half a million dollars of my own money as well, it has truly been a labor of love," Small wrote in his resignation letter. He joined the Smithsonian in 2000 after serving as president of Fannie Mae.


(snip)

Small is a staunch Republican. He owes his appointment to Chief Justice William Renquist, who as chair of the Board of regents at the Smithsonian appointed him as secretary even though he had no obvious qualifications for the job. Over the years he has donated to George Bush, Bob Ney, Tom DeLay, Trent Lott, Rick Santorum and Americans for a Republican Majority, among others. None are exactly strong supporters of evolutionary theory, preferring the pseudo-science of "Intelligent Design". So it isn't surprising that Small presided over the decision to show the ID propaganda movie "The Privileged Planet: The Search for Purpose in the Universe" at America's premier scientific museum. The good news is that Small has been replaced by an actual scientist - Christian Samper, a biologist who heads the National Museum of Natural History.

So let's recap shall we? An official who gets his position through cronyism, with private illegalities which make a mockery of his public responsibilities, who presides over a sellout to corporate interests and finally resigns just ahead of an investigation into whether his fingers were in the till. What a very perfect Republican scandal.

........

Wonder when the sign was made? Are we ever really surprised any more? Disgusting!:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC