Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did you just hear the pharmacist on Thom Hartmann?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 01:09 PM
Original message
Did you just hear the pharmacist on Thom Hartmann?
She stated that by law she can't discuss with seniors the better Medicare D plans that could save them money on their prescriptions. If a senior has a $30 co-pay on his Medicare Part D, she can't tell him about the plan that has a $10 co-pay. I have to tell you that Medicare D is the biggest crap of legislation passed by a Republican Congress under the Bush administration, but this is really beyond the pale. I did not know this. I wonder how many other hidden agendas are written into this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. That isn't true around here. Walgreens printed out and explained the plans.
The did not make suggestions on which plan to pick, but did help as much as possible. Unless they've changed the law, they still provide that service.

I would question whether that is a law or a company policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I asked my pharmacy K-Mart if they had someone who could explain
the part "D" plans to me and she said they didn't and seemed kind of uncomfortable about it. I thought for sure they could because they deal with it all the time and who would better know than the pharmacists? But she wouldn't help and now I know why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes I heard her. I didn't know pharmacists weren't allowed to tell
you of better plans, BUT, when we chose our plan, I went through an insuurance broker who specializes in medicare only plans. He was very knowledgable and after gathering information of our medical needs, recommended several plans, explained the difference between each one, and even told me about a lot of things that were hidden in some popular plans that you would NEVER know. It's not that they won't tell you about some of these things, but they're things at least I would never think to ask about!

I checked. It was no more expensive to go through a broker who is licensed to sell all available plans that it would have been if I did all the research and contacted the companies directly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yy4me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. I know I'm playing with fire but I can't even afford part D. With
$100.00 taken from my S.S. check each month for part B, there isn't much left for anything. For the life of me, I can't figure out why anyone thought part D was a good idea. Prescription drugs should be part of the monthly $100.00 and not an additional fee. Do the decision makers think a few hundred dollars a month Social Security check makes the recipients wealthy?

It has reached the point that nothing makes sense any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't have Part D either. It looked like a con job to me from the beginning,
but I did have a look at it this time during the enrollment period and found out that I would be punished for not enrolling from the beginning with my monthly rate being increased for each year I didn't enroll. Is this a way to treat senior citizens on a fixed income?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. there are programs that don't have monthly premiums
but you have to DIG for them, and they catch you on the back end with their deductibles and their *donut holes*. One I spotted was no monthly premium, but a $239 deductible. WTF?

It's obscene. It's SHAMEFUL that the weakest in this country take the most gouging - not only by the medicos, but by our government. One Hundred dollars a month for a health program that is a bare minimum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Isn't all this can't tell b.s. against the first amendment?
Whoever heard of such stuff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You missed the last clause when you read the first amendment
You missed the part about "except when it interferes with corporate profits." :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. nodding.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Or the religious nut squad . . .
as in the case of abortion and birth control information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. My parents' financial advisor was giving seminars on choosing the Medicare
prescription plan that's right for you, bring your medicine bottles and compare.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I don't think there is any plan that's right because it was written
by the PhRMA industry lobbyists, so you can imagine who will benefit. Also your parents financial advisor won't do us much good will he, if we don't use him for his services or live where he has his business?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. I guess my "rolling eyes" icon was too subtle
I was trying to say I think it is ridiculous, not recommend it for anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
European Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Dems need to add a simple affordable government plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. What we need is for drugs to be included in Medicare, Part B., which
we already have to pay $96.00 a month for. The cheapest plan that I could see on Part D was an additional $30 a month. People living on SS can't afford this. If drugs were included in Part B and bargained for in bulk like the VA does, it's possible. Of course the PhRMAs would have to do without their big profits and millions of dollars a year salaries for their executives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. I agree with you.
Part D was one of the biggest bad jokes ever played on SS recipients.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hmmmm, well, giving advice about medical plans could be a liability problem
I can see it happening. However, telling people that there may be a cheaper plan should definitely be legal. Unfortunately, some pharmacists would undoubt get paid off by the companies to refer business to them. Not most of them, but some would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Then the company that the pharmacists work for should have rules
about taking bribes on the condition that they would be fired for doing so. It's not an insurmountable problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I agree, but there also a lot of lawsuit happy people who would sue
if it ended up that they recommended the wrong plan. That's why I say it may be better if they don't recommend a specific plan, but be able to say that the plan they have is not the best for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. D = disaster
HR 676 = the fix
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. yep, the biggest single chunk of projected medicare increase is due to
this drug industry subsidy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. What's weird is a number of seniors who still can't afford their medication
or to buy into part D so they are not getting what they need and yet the PhRMAS are robbing the Medicare fund happily all the way to the bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC