Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harriett Miers, the "Achilles Heel"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:05 AM
Original message
Harriett Miers, the "Achilles Heel"?
---

Will she go to jail to protect Bush?
Not likely and Bush cannot exercise "executive privilege" over her considering she is a former White House Council.

In other words...she is an "Achilles Heel".

---


"...Bush's greatest problem here, however, is Harriett Miers. It is dubious he can exert any privilege over a former White House Counsel; I doubt she is ready to go to prison for him; and all who know her say if she is under oath, she will not lie. That could be a problem."

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20070323.html


---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Try this parallel:
You have an attorney and divulge things to him that could get you in hot water: "Yes, Mike, I did embezzle that $20 million." As part of the defense, you show him the accounting records and try to provide an explanation.

But you don't like the pre-trial motions he's filing. You don't like his defense strategy, and you don't think he's doing a good job. You fire him.

He's no longer your attorney. Does he take the records where you pointed out how you embezzled the money and turn them over to the court? Or does attorney-client privilege still hold, so if he took the info you gave him, he'd be disbarred?

The latter. Now, this is a parallel, not a restatement of the Miers business (I assume that Miers isn't *'s attorney, so attorney-client privilege isn't an issue).

In both cases it's not the current status of the person that's involved, it's the status of the advising or discussion at the time it occurred. I'm not saying that Miers is covered by executive privilege; that I don't know, and presumably SCOTUS will decide (or maybe not, they don't like interfering in this mess until both sides have tried to work out a compromise).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC