Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Carrier USS Kennedy Decommissioned

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:50 AM
Original message
Carrier USS Kennedy Decommissioned


MAYPORT, Fla. - Sailors in blue lined the deck of the aircraft carrier USS John F. Kennedy on Friday as guns boomed to commemorate the decommissioning of "Big John" after nearly 40 years of service.

Officers gathered in front of a screen displaying a large American flag, and speakers echoed the words of the carrier's namesake, including the famed line from President Kennedy's 1961 inauguration: "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."



One of two remaining fossil fuel-powered aircraft carriers in the Navy, the ship supported Operation Desert Shield in Iraq in 1990, and was deployed in February 2002 to the North Arabian Sea during Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan.

It also supported Operation Iraqi Freedom in June 2004, and its airwing dropped more than 54,000 pounds of bombs on Iraq.

The Kennedy, based in Florida since 1995, recently served as a training platform for Navy pilots to obtain carrier landing qualification. The Navy suspended the ship's flight operations about a year ago, citing faulty landing equipment.



http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17750689/


Every time I hear that one of these ships is decommissioned, I wonder, are these vessels that decrepit and out of date that they could not be retrofitted vs a completely building a new ship using valuable resources? If someone can explain in a way that would truly justify this practice I would be amazed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. A whole bunch of money was put into keep her afloat
for this long. She was in SLEP (Service Life Extension Program) in Philadelphia in the 80's for a thorough overhaul. Also technology has advanced considerably in the past 40 years and it is often difficult to retrofit an old gal. I often get a little maudlin about decommissionings. I hope Big John becomes a Museum instead of a reef.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I have mixed feelings about it. Even though I am a pacifist I feel a little sad about it.
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 10:58 AM by GreenPartyVoter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ya can't humanize a ship
but you can come to love some of them; not all but some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. refitting her to nuclear would be too expensive
but I do hope she becomes a museum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. I assume that converting it from diesel to nuclear
would cost too much, but I'm not an expert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Three words: Floating Drag Strip!
Better be able to shut down fast!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. 40 years is an old ship
Sometimes retrofitting is simply impossible. Also fossil fuel steamers have a hard time keeping up with nukes. Ongoing maintenance programs envision eventual decommissioning. They are not designed to keep the ship as new in the same way you keep your car running for as long as possible but do not replace the engine or other major components every few years to maintain orginal performance specs.

Most of the time the work that is done is as cheaply as possible to keep the vessel in class or on schedule.

Unless the ship has some very unique charateristics that become attractive (as what happened to some of the WWII vintage battleships) again, it has a life expectancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Also, hulls and welds get weak
Corrosion makes metal thinner, and all sorts of internal equipment (wiring, plumbing, etc.) starts to fall apart. A ship can become very dangerous very quickly, and you don't want that in a warship, especially. They should name the next one they build after JFK, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC