|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
kentuck
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 10:09 AM Original message |
Obama should withdraw Tim Geithner's nomination for Treasury. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
1. I think they are first looking to see if it was a miscommunication in tax laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU9598
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
2. Unfortunately I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
3. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
4. No he shouldn't. If someone was going to deliberately cheat on their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
5. His pay is probably electronically deposited |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
32. Yeah. These are things that happen, not a criminal attitude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
33. That's very close to what actually happened, I think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
6. His troubles are minor and shouldn't be exploited politically on either side of the aisle. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 11:25 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Just what are his qualifications? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 11:33 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. You just proved my point -- Your opposition is NOT based on his tax/housekeeper problems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 11:53 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. And you just proved my point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. and now you are jumping to conclusions -- I neither support nor oppose him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:14 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I said this in my original post: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. they are minor infractions and not an indicator of anything except you oppose him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:20 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Do you support him or oppose? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:27 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. I have a nonplussed "meh" reaction to this nomination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:25 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. Tax evasion is punishable by prison terms. That's how serious it can be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:28 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Since it was resolved, I think "minor" in this particular case is warranted. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Runcible Spoon
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:02 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. and opposition doesn't HAVE to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:07 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I feel the same passionate opposition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Runcible Spoon
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. oh don't get me started... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:18 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. hopefully the diversity of his nominations will counter that bent ... hopefully :( |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
12. Kentuck should withdraw Rush Limbaugh's show from his radio. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:15 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. I don't listen to Rush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:23 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Or Glenn Beck, or Michael Savage, or Bill O'Reilly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. None of the above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:25 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Just the loony RW talking points about Geithner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:27 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Why do you support him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:28 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Why do you support loony RW talking points? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:30 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Since I do not know what points you are talking about...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
20. Completely agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
25. I agree and Farce of Nature summed it up nicely: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 12:29 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. If you're talking about this post, I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-09 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
34. I'll take the tax bust. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC