Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Measure Introduced to give incentives for voluntary retirement of fuel-inefficient vehicles

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 07:44 PM
Original message
Measure Introduced to give incentives for voluntary retirement of fuel-inefficient vehicles
Measure Introduced by Senators Feinstein, Collins, and Schumer Would Establish National Incentive Program for Voluntary Retirement of Fuel-Inefficient Vehicles


Washington, DC – A measure introduced today by U.S. Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), and Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) would establish a national voucher program to enable and encourage drivers to voluntarily trade in their older, less fuel efficient car, truck or SUV for a more fuel efficient vehicle.

Specifically, the so-called “Cash for Clunkers” program would reimburse drivers with a credit of $2,500 to $4,500 for drivers who turn in fuel-inefficient vehicles to be scrapped, and purchase a more fuel efficient vehicle. The traded-in vehicles must have a fuel economy of no more than 18 miles per gallon, be in drivable condition, and have been registered for at least the past 120 days. Vouchers could also be redeemed for transit fares for participating local public transportation agencies. The program would operate for four years, from 2009 – 2012, and is expected to encourage the early retirement of up to one million vehicles per year.

“Last Congress, we successfully enacted legislation – which I authored with Senator Snowe and others – to improve the fuel efficiency of America’s fleet of new cars, trucks and SUVs by at least 10 miles per gallon over 10 years. But we face real challenges with trying to encourage drivers to trade in their older, less fuel efficient vehicles – particularly in this tough economic climate,” Senator Feinstein said.

“This bill will help address that problem. It will create a voucher program to reimburse drivers who trade in their old cars, trucks and SUVs with a coupon of $2,500 to $4,500, depending on the fuel efficiency of the purchased car. If enacted, this bill would be an important part of helping getting America’s struggling automobile industry back on its feet – and help consumers who are concerned about covering the cost of buying a more fuel efficient vehicle. I’d like to thank my colleague Senator Salazar for his leadership in helping to craft some of the bill’s key concepts,” Senator Feinstein added.

“This legislation would give consumers an incentive to turn over their old, inefficient vehicles, saving 80,000 barrels of motor fuel every day,” Senator Collins said. “Taking these cars and trucks off our roads and highways would help reduce our dependence on foreign oil, decrease greenhouse gas emissions, and stimulate the economy. In addition, it would help boost demand for manufacturers of newer, efficient models and bring in new business for car dealers who are struggling in the current economy.”

Senator Schumer said: “For Americans who have a clunker sitting in their driveway, this is an even better trade-in offer than they could get from any car dealership. Our proposal will take inefficient cars off the roads in exchange for a down payment on a newer, cleaner vehicle. Car owners also have the option of swapping their old car for vouchers to ride their local bus or subway for free. This is a classic win-win that can provide stimulus for the economy and make long-term gains for the environment.”

When implemented, as estimated by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, the program would:

* Save between 40,000 to 80,000 barrels per day of motor fuel by the end of the fourth year, (based on an estimated 500,000 to 1,000,000 vouchers issued per year).
* Reduce greenhouse gas emissions between 6.6 million metric tons to 7.6 million metric tons, or the equivalent of removing 1.1 million to 2.2 million vehicles from the road in one year, (based on an estimated 500,000 to 1,000,000 vouchers issued per year).
* Reduce nitrogen oxides, which cause ground-level ozone (a leading cause of respiratory health problems, like asthma), by 3,043 short tons (2,761 metric tons) by 2013, (based on an estimated 500,000 to 1,000,000 vouchers issued per year).

The legislation is intended to help compliment the implementation of the new fuel economy law – authored by Senators Feinstein, Snowe and others – which would raise average fuel economy standards for America’s fleet of vehicles by at least 10 miles per gallon (mpg) over 10 years or from 25 mpg to at least 35 mpg by Model Year 2020.

Companion legislation is also being introduced today in the House by Representatives Steve Israel (D-N.Y.), Jay Inslee (D-Wash.), Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), and Dennis Moore (D-Kansas).

How the legislation would work:

Eligible drivers would receive a reimbursement voucher for the purchase of a new or used vehicle with a fuel economy rating that exceeds the CAFE target for that class of vehicle by at least 25 percent. The bill also requires that the voucher be used towards the purchase of a vehicle that has an MSRP of less than $45,000, is model year 2004 or later, and meets or exceeds federal emissions standards. Vouchers could also be redeemed for transit fares for participating local public transportation agencies.

Drivers who apply for the program must ensure that their vehicles turned in for scrapping match the following criteria:

* Vehicles must be in drivable condition;
* Be currently registered in the U.S.; and
* Have a when-new fuel economy rating of less than 18 miles per gallon (as reported by the original manufacturer for purposes of CAFE compliance).

The bill specifies that during the first year of the program, vouchers will be issued for the following amounts:

* For traded-in vehicles that are model year 2002 and later, drivers would receive a voucher for:
o The purchase of a new vehicle: $4,500
o The purchase of a used vehicle: $3,000
o Transit fare credit: $3,000
* For traded-in vehicles that are model year 1999 – 2001, drivers would receive a voucher for:
o The purchase of a new vehicle: $3,000
o The purchase of a used vehicle: $2,000
o Transit fare credit: $2,000
* For traded-in vehicles that are model year 1998 and earlier, drivers would receive a voucher for:
o The purchase of a new vehicle: $2,000
o The purchase of a used vehicle: $1,500
o Transit fare credit: $1,500

In each subsequent year (2010, 2011, and 2012), the model years would be advanced by one year. Vouchers would be eligible for redemption for up to two years after the date of issuance, and no individual would be eligible to obtain more than one voucher in any three-year period. Dealers, dismantlers and scrap recycling facilities would also be eligible for a payment of $50 per vehicle, or an alternative amount to be specified by the Department of Energy.

http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=NewsRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=d6137935-0a4f-1ab7-ddb4-8a1760ea170c&Region_id=&Issue_id=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. And it will only cost a minimum of 2.5 billion dollars a year
if they get their expected 1 million participants. Since they money goes to buy new cars, it ends up helping the economy anyway.

I wonder if this would work...
Go out and buy 10 really old gas guzzling clunkers for a few thousand dollars cash them in for $4500 each and get a new $44K car for free?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sounds like a plan to me
it might just work :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. If I trade in my 1999 that gets 30 MPG for
a hybid that gets 45 MPG a 50% increase I get nothing. I could trade an old clunker that gets 18MPG in for a new SUV that gets 19 MPG and get a tax credit, doesn't sound fair to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Where's my four grand for not buying a gas hog in the first place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They gave it to Bank Of America
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well as long as it went to someone who needs it I'm cool with that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yeah, the bank was facing foreclosure so we felt sorry for em
just like they do when they are foreclosing on someone :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yeah that's what I was thinking, I have a 1999 that gets 30 MPG
Edited on Fri Jan-16-09 08:25 PM by doc03
and trade it off for a hybrid I get nothing. My neighbor trades off his 18MPG SUV for another one that gets 19 MPG he gets a break I get nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Our 1991 Honda Accord EX gets better gas mileage than some "new" ones
It's not as "lovely" as it was when we got it all those years ago, but until it DIES, we will drive it..keep your $2K voucher..

$2K "down" on an equivalent replacement means payments or a HUGE outlay of cash on our part, so no thanks.

My husband's 1988 Dodge pickup is also not that great to look at these days, but it gets over 23MPG highway, and was paid for a LONG time ago..

People who fear losing their jobs will NOT welcome a "coupon" to get rid of a paid-for car, in exchange for years of payments on a vehicale they may end up losing, if they lose their jobs.

and how many people will be required to adminsiter such a program..to make SURE the old cars end up crushed and permanently off the road? Some old cars have a LOT of value for parts or because there would be some people who unwittingly "turned in" a valuable oldie..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. My 91 chevy silverado half-ton gets about 17 mpg
It is a secondary car driven only for hauling and emergencies, runs great, has nearly universal access to parts and was paid for with cash.

To get a newer truck with marginally better mileage would set us back thousands of dollars, not to mention we probably couldn't get a decent loan because of my bankruptcy. Besides we'd never use it enough to make it worthwhile.

Since we don't do stupid things like commute 50 miles one way or anything, I think I'll just be holding on to my truck thanks.

Now if they started issuing financial incentives for mopeds....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. There is the Bicycle Commuter Act but that requires effort on the part of the user
And who wants to do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I actually have turned on several of my bike riding
co-workers to the that act. However, right now I live on the edge of town and our temp here is hovering around freezing. The guys who have only blocks to go can do it, I can't in the winter as the distance is a few miles.

I would take the bus as I did earlier in the year, but am now working graveyard so busses are right out.

Bikes are effing fantastic, but they are not a one-size-fits-all solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. Two grand is not enough.
My 87 TLC is worth more than that. This bill is for real clunkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. no shit. and if you are driving a clunker, then $2000 probably won't get you into a new car... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC