|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 02:00 PM Original message |
Anyone who doesn't think there are going to be some paybacks for the past 8 years is nuts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. Anybody who confuses the rule of law with paybacks doesn't understand the rule of law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 02:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. When the dismissal of "the rule of law" is followed by the rule of law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 02:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. So you believe that holding someone accountable for violating the law is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 03:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. You don't huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 03:48 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Which state are you refering to> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 04:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. functionally the same this time. . . . . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 04:16 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Please elaborate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 02:27 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. OK then just replace the word Prosecutions for 'paybacks' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 02:32 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Those words are not synonyms, and that's the point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaPera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 05:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Nothing less than jail for the worthless regugs! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 06:35 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. I say investigate and find out how the executive branch went so rotten. Then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PearliePoo2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. What HE said! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
3. We need to track any and all movements, and employment of high officials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. President Obama will need cooperation from a Congress that has less than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
6. Please don't say "nuts" like it's a Bad Thing. It's offensive to us Nuts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
7. And you back that promise with.....what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
11. I don't want payback. I want order and legitimate govt restored. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 03:24 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Its not an either/or thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 04:56 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. You can have rule of law or law of the jungle, but not both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenTea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
13. Bullshit, Dems are too nice, they want to be allow bi-partisanship something the fucking republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mountainvue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-17-09 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
16. The electorate already paid them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC