Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Worst presidential legacy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bossy Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 09:56 PM
Original message
Poll question: Worst presidential legacy
The suspense isn't noticeably killing me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Reagan made all the rest of it possible, so I chose him.
Edited on Sun Jan-18-09 09:57 PM by ogneopasno
Edited because I had originally put "voted for," and I threw up a little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. With that logic, you should have voted for Nixon.
He is the true father of the modern GOP.

But I think the poll was about the individual President.

Bush, hands down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Same here. Stupid wouldn't be nearly as bad
had not Reagan, his father, and to a lesser extent Clinton all laid the groundwork for him.

He's the culmination of 40 years of conservative rule by GOPs and southern Democrats, capped off by 28 years of fiscal insanity from the far right.

You can't declare economic war on your own citizens for long before you destroy the economy completely, something every king with a thirst for empire and peasants to starve for the funding has found out to his horror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. No contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush is the culmination of Reagan's legacy.
Do you condemn the one who set us on the path to destruction? Or the one in charge when the crash occurred?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6.  but Bush is the culmination..
of all that went before. He had all the support he needed for doing any damn thing he wanted, and those ties have roots that go way, way back. But he is the face of the last 8 years, regardless of the well-connected families and friends that propped him up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. without a doubt ..George W. Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. None of those other guys screwed multiple pooches. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. I've gotta go with Buchanan
After all, his term saw ongoing guerrilla warfare in Kansas, the ruling (in Dred Scott) that only whites were US citizens and a full scale economic collapse, the Panic of 1857. And as he left office, seven states has seceded from the Union, formed their own confederacy, seized federal properties and were raising an army. The stage was set for civil war, which would be this nation's bloodiest conflict.

Yes, Bush has fucked things up royally, but I think the state of affairs that Obama inherits is a bit better than that of 1861.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PFunk Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I agree for many of the same reasons
Though Bush is now a close second who like Buchanan has left the US a now much divided country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I agree, and you forgot to list some of Buchanan's other failures
Among the things you didn't mention he failed miserably with.

-Insisted that succeeding from the union was unconstitutional, but that the federal government couldn't do anything about the southern states succeeding from the union because that's unconstitutional to.

-Sat back and did nothing while southern states raided Union armories where they stored a bunch of weapons, an action many consider treasonous.

-Tried, and failed, to offer more compromises to the south to get them to stay into the union, failing to realize that once the south had succeeded they couldn't just willingly rejoin the union again just like that, as no one would take them seriously anymore when they threatened succession.

-The south was talking about succeeding from the union if Lincoln was elected, Lincoln wasn't even on the ballot on a lot of southern states. With all of that talk of succession even before the election don't you think that a competent president would have prepared for what to do when the election results were in, possibly showing a Lincoln victory that the south dreaded, or even taken some preemptive actions against the confederacy by transferring weapons in union armories located in the south up north, where the south couldn't reach them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. reagan, of course- with bill clinton a VERY close second.
dumbya doesn't even have a legacy yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. I guess a good argument could be made for Buchanan
But let's see -- the 9/11 attacks after clear warnings were ignored; invading Iraq without cause or justification (just a pack of lies); gross violations of the Geneva Conventions and the Bill of Rights; the slow and inadequate response to Hurricane Katrina; the politicization of the Justice Department, to include the bogus prosecution of Don Siegelman and others; and the financial meltdown including the mortgage foreclosure crisis.

And all Buchanan left us was an embryonic civil war. Fortunately, he was followed by a great president who succeeded in holding the nation together.

True, Buchanan's legacy tore the country apart. However, even the freepers should wish Obama success, because if he fails in cleaning up the mess Bush has left us, the United States could be going the way of the Soviet Union. That is not an exaggeration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. Some were venal or stupid
and some, like Reagan, may have tried to ruin the country. But no one has ever presided over the harm and deterioration of our nation more than the moron, bush, the willing puppet for the neocon coup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC