|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-19-09 12:49 PM Original message |
Gates has been designated Successor by the Outgoing Administration-YIKES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-19-09 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sorry Mds-I checked but it didn't show up DUPE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-19-09 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
2. Oh fuck, maybe I won't be drinking tomorrow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-19-09 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
3. Makes sense since he is the hold over from administration to administration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bushmeister0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-19-09 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
4. OMFG! Gonzo was 'that guy' once? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-19-09 01:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. scary thought.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-19-09 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
5. It's a symbolic move, IMO n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-19-09 02:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Gates should not be the appointed successor to Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-19-09 02:49 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Umm...Gates is a civilian... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-20-09 04:03 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Way down the line, and by the way, the succession occurs at a certain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-19-09 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
7. You can trust him. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Winterblues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-19-09 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
8. I have never heard of an "outgoing" Administration making such a decision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-19-09 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. WTF??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phred42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-19-09 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
10. Holy Crap! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC