Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have no problem with bush's commutation of the sentences of Ramos and Compean

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:57 PM
Original message
I have no problem with bush's commutation of the sentences of Ramos and Compean
the two ex-border patrol agents. They shot an unarmed drug smuggler in the butt as he was fleeing. They tried to cover up what they did. It was criminal, and they lost their jobs over it. They've spent two years in prison. That's about right. Their sentences were harsh. I have no objection to this commutation, and politicians from both sides lobbied for it. They're both still convicted felons. Bush didn't pardon them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Information is power. This is the epitome of the RW noise machine and willful MSM compliance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Agreed.
They deserved to be convicted, but their sentences were excessive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. their sentences were far to lenient.
THey should be in jail for a very long time. They are criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Do you think they should have been in jail for more than a decade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Do you think Senator Stevens should go to jail for 35 years?
These men attempted cold blooded murder. Fired fifteen shots at fleeing men, yet some here think their jail time was too harsh and yet scream for Stevens to go to jail for each of his five counts of false statements on his Senate disclosure form..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I think one has nothing to do with the other (except for you trying to change the subject)
But, to answer your question, I don't think Stevens should get 35 years. That would be an excessive sentence, even though I believe that public corruption should be punished relatively harshly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Stevens should. He sold out our state for personal gain and who
knows how many people he hurt by his actions, how many people's lives were changed for the worse. Using Stevens here is amazing. He deserves
fifty years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebubula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Please....
....elaborate on why they should be in jail for longer than 10 years?

Criminal is a state sponsored definition. I am a criminal because I smoke marijuana.

Please...other than cover up a shooting (for which no one died) of a drug smuggler in the desert(for which they deserved some punishment to be sure) , what is their crime? Rapists get less time than these two did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Drug smuggler or girl scout, what do you think they were attempting with 15 shots other than murder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Agreed.
But, then again, Joe the "plumber" will need body guards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. And the spin just keeps on whirling. They were "drug smugglers" that were "shot in the butt",
not people that the agents attempted to kill as they were running away. When you take a 9mm round in the ass, you can tell us all how it is no big deal. I'm sure you won't mind the constant pain and limping for the rest of your life, and the likely onset of chronic arthritis is just a hoot, and wheelchairs are really cool anyway.

After failing to kill them and knowing that their actions were illegal, they compounded their offense by attempting to cover it up.

So the argument is that it is OK for LEOs to convict and execute anyone they decide "has it coming", and if they fail to carry out the execution, they can try to cover it up, and failing that as well, they should get off because it doesn't really matter anyway, incompetence is justification.

Now if the argument goes that our sentencing is too harsh and our prison system a travesty that makes no discernible effort at reintegrating convicted criminals back into society we might agree, but this OP is just more reich-wing BS.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wasn't it basically attempted murder?
Ive seen people go to jail far longer than 2 years for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. Border guards shot an unarmed man as he ran away and they tried to cover it up...
Edited on Mon Jan-19-09 02:54 PM by cynatnite
oh, yeah, their sentences were harsh :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. 15 shots at the back of an unarmed man
you can't be serious if you think that 2 years for attempted murder is fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Cali does this kind of post regularly
Wants to see the people get angry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Hey, I love cali's posts
Edited on Mon Jan-19-09 06:50 PM by no limit
but yeah, he/she likes to play devil's advocate from time to time. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zookeeper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. K & R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. heh, can't believe it but I agree with you
Manslaughter is three years. Their sentences were too long. Of course, there are lots of people in jail with sentences that are too long. And plenty with sentences that are too short, as well.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Bush-s-Last-100-Days--Wha-by-Betsy-Ross-090116-740.html

They aren't heroes, but they have suffered enough.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. How long has John Hinckley been locked up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC