KO and John Dean Drop "Bomb!" Did Bush issue "Secret Pardons" when he left?
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:23 PM
Original message |
KO and John Dean Drop "Bomb!" Did Bush issue "Secret Pardons" when he left? |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-22-09 08:24 PM by KoKo01
Who are they? :shrug: Dean says it's "acceptable" we won't know until "International Courts." What the hell was THAT about? :shrug:
|
seemslikeadream
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message |
1. We'll find out ONLY in the court room |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-22-09 08:25 PM by seemslikeadream
or in an international court
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Only if the court isn't held as "secret" in some fashion. |
seemslikeadream
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. get Cheney on the witness stand |
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Great discussion. The question I wanted KO to ask Dean was whether he thought Budh didn't pardon Libby hoping he'd expose Cheney - you know polish up his legacy and leave Cheney with the bag. Bushes only care about themselves.
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
14. John Dean also said Bush was a cold fella. |
|
damn straight, love John Dean.
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. I think it's more than cold |
|
It's self- absorbed elitism - only his folks are important.
|
LakeSamish706
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Dean also said that Bush could not issue pardons that would cover.... |
|
the Administration for International crimes; ie: War Crimes.... I was pretty sure of that, and now it is confirmed.
|
MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. He Can't Pardon From Prosecution By International Courts |
|
Which I expect will indict Dim Son and Rummy at the least. But Obama won't go after it.
|
LakeSamish706
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Yeah, I wondered if Obama would go after it..... The US could and probably... |
|
will be under a major amount of pressure to pursue war crimes charges though....
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. the UN can do it Keith reported it the other nite. |
LakeSamish706
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. I sure as hell hope that it doesn't go away... These suckers need to be in jail. n/t |
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
17. on Hardball tonite one of regulars that Chris Matthews had on |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-22-09 08:56 PM by alyce douglas
said there is alot of bloggers who are wanting this (war crimes to be prosecuted). Let's keep posting about this.
|
MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. Most Americans Would Get Really Pissed If A Former Prez Was Prosecuted |
|
Even Bush. Sad, but true (I'm pretty sure). We won't prosecute or extradite.
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
19. I wouldn't be pissed I would welcome it. |
LakeSamish706
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
22. Not only that, I would expect that since it is law breaking, plain and simple. |
Adsos Letter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
26. I wouldn't be pissed...I would consider it a return to the rule of law and justice. |
|
One of the things for which this nation is supposed to stand.
|
AnnieBW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:30 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Is that like Double Secret Probation? |
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:33 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I pondered this question several years ago. |
|
Whether or not there is a constitutional requirement to file pardons in some official manner.
If a president could produce a signed and notarized "pardon" from his back pocket, that had been kept secret for a period of many years, it would seem to meet the loosest of loose interpretation of the Constitution's pardon power.
|
MineralMan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. I don't know about that one... |
|
Seems to me that the granting of the pardon must be made public during a President's term. Once he leaves the White House, he can no longer do any damn thing at all.
Leaving "secret" pardons sound like a conspiracy theorist's nightmare. Too much foil by far.
|
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
25. Bush was so Secretive...maybe he found his lawyer could find another way to get around laws like |
|
Gonzo and Yoo did for him with Iraq and like the others did for him so he could leave the White House and never deliver anything about his Administration to our Congress or the National Archives.
Bush/Cheney will write their OWN HISTORY and the PEOPLE will never know the "full truth" even though we know exactly what they did...we Progressives on the Left who've been watching them since they STOLE the 2000 Election...that is.
I guess they were and will always be "Above the Law" when they can find lawyers unscrupulous enough to re-write the laws or ignore the laws for their client....
|
GreenPartyVoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:49 PM
Response to Original message |
11. So what does that mean? You can start building a case against **co and when you |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-22-09 08:49 PM by GreenPartyVoter
finally head to court they whip out this secret pardon and get off scot-free? (But only after people have spend a lot of money on the case?)
|
glitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
24. And if it's secret they can probably just make them up on the fly, as needed. BOGUS. |
|
That would mean a former President can issue pardons at any time. And if this is true how come it isn't common knowledge?
|
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 08:58 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I was wondering if there was such a thing as secret pardons |
|
If there were, it seems likely old Dubya would use them to get his buddies off the hook.
|
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
21. They kind of left "hanging in the wind" whether Obama can reveal them, or not? |
|
:shrug: I hope we hear more about this...the details. It was weird that Bush left without the pardons we thought he would issue ...but there are so many damned "secret rules" in our Congress and now it seems our White House that we as Citizens know NOTHING ABOUT! Why?
|
Missy Vixen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 09:00 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Maybe this is too early to say this, |
|
but I TOLD YOU SO.
I KNEW Bush would do something like this on his way out the door.
Seriously. DH's out of work, so we're short on disposable income, but I will donate $10 to DU if any of those pardons name him or Cheney.
Julie
|
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-22-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Sounds like tinfoil unless we have any evidence suggesting that he did. nt |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-22-09 09:04 PM by Occam Bandage
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Dec 27th 2024, 01:58 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.