Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wait for it - it's coming: OBAMA not eligible to run in 2012

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:32 AM
Original message
Wait for it - it's coming: OBAMA not eligible to run in 2012
The pathetic blustering from Faux news and other rabid-wing sources over the oath of office - to recap the bluster:

- 1/20/09 Obama is not president because Roberts flubbed administering the Oath

- 1/21/09 to cover bases, Obama, takes the Oath again, but blusterheads say it's not valid because there was no bible present

- 1/22/09 blusterheads say orders signed on 1/20/09 by Obama are not valid because the Oath taken on that day was not valid, therefore Obama wasn't President.

Coming soon to a rabid-source: Obama is not eligible to run in 2012 because he took the oath twice and is now in his 2nd term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fox news will succeed in organizing a militant resistance.
It will be made up of gun nuts, survivalists, fundamentalist christians, racists, end-of-the-world-freaks, and lead by Sara Palin.

They will be violent and commit crimes against the american people. That is my prediction. Roberts did it on purpose. He threw ths band of idiots a huge bone. A reason and purpose for their insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. thats why FOX news should not be allowed access, cut it off like a tumor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Cut it, cut it, cut it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Hooray Facism!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cat1985 Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. BOB will run
I cannot see this actually happening but you do raise and interesting pioint.

I am sure that there will be loop holes that will allow for him to ruin in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffreyWilliamson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. BOB will run?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. the swearing in is for show. BO became pres at noon on tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. didn't have to wait long
I had to go to the production floor this morning to take photos of some equipment being shipped... overheard two guys discussing the Obama oath issue, one of them actually said that since he took the oath twice he's not eligible to run in 2012....

not sure if the guy heard this "meme" from some rabid-winger or if he "thunk it up by hisself"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Obama eligible to run in 2016 and 2012 because of Chief Justice Roberts
mistake in administering the oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. They think they can undo the will of the People with these minor
technicalities. It shows how much they disrespect our system. That they even want to says something negative about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stellabella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oh for pete's sake.
He automatically became president at noon on January 20th. He doesn't have to swear an oath, on ANYTHING. It's ceremonial.

These repukes are going to grab onto ANYTHING to try to de-legitimize his administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Maybe this will keep them busy for a while.
There's absolutely no legal leg for them to stand on - previous presidents have taken the oath in different ways - twice before, there've been oath redos, there've also been Presidents who just say "I do" instead of repeating the oath word-for-word, and yes, there have been Presidents who didn't put their hand on a bible. And there's nothing in the Constitution that requires a hand on a bible. Toss in the 20th Amendment argument, and the oathers will be shot down in 20 different ways.

The oathers are just wasting their energy. And I'm fine with that - any energy they put into futile crap like this is energy they're not spending productively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. TYPICAL RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA!! Sad, just sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. Is Faux something we can smoke at parties now?
Cuz it sure as hell aint serious news.

sounds like Friday Night Drug Explorations down at the Rabid Dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. There is a button on your remote called "OFF" USE IT!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. If he's not president, that means he can run in 2012 and 2016
Eat that, assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's not up to them to decide
If Congress and the SCOTUS recognize Obama as POTUS then Obama is POTUS. I think that's already been made perfectly clear.

Blusterheads can quibble all they want. It doesn't change the fact that Obama is President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. I don't really care how much they say it...
'Won't make it true. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. If that's the argument they want to make
then I say we declare Obama's first four years a regency, and that he should be eligible to run in 2016 as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC