Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GITMO - "There Are NO Files"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:15 AM
Original message
GITMO - "There Are NO Files"
Edited on Sun Jan-25-09 11:41 AM by kpete
THIS EXPLAINS A LOT.... Hilzoy reported on this overnight, but I don't want the news to get lost in the shuffle. It's one of those breathtaking stories that is almost too painful to believe.

Upon announcing his plan to close the military detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Barack Obama also began a process that would review the case files for every detainee. The problem for the new administration, however, is that there are no files.

President Obama's plans to expeditiously determine the fates of about 245 terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and quickly close the military prison there were set back last week when incoming legal and national security officials -- barred until the inauguration from examining classified material on the detainees -- discovered that there were no comprehensive case files on many of them.

Instead, they found that information on individual prisoners is "scattered throughout the executive branch," a senior administration official said. The executive order Obama signed Thursday orders the prison closed within one year, and a Cabinet-level panel named to review each case separately will have to spend its initial weeks and perhaps months scouring the corners of the federal government in search of relevant material.

Several former Bush administration officials agreed that the files are incomplete and that no single government entity was charged with pulling together all the facts and the range of options for each prisoner. They said that the CIA and other intelligence agencies were reluctant to share information, and that the Bush administration's focus on detention and interrogation made preparation of viable prosecutions a far lower priority. http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_01/016593.php


I mention this, in part to help resolve some lingering confusion. On the one hand, the Bush administration released some detainees who apparently turned out to be pretty dangerous. On the other, the Bush administration refused to release other detainees who weren't dangerous at all, and were actually U.S. allies.

How could this happen? In light of these revelations about the lack of files, it starts to make a lot more sense.

But to put this in an even larger context, consider just how big a mess Bush has left for Obama here. The previous administration a) tortured detainees, making it harder to prosecute dangerous terrorists; b) released bad guys while detaining good guys; and c) neglected to keep comprehensive files on possible terrorists who've been in U.S. custody for several years. As if the fiasco at Gitmo weren't hard enough to clean up.

.................

more at:
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_01/016597.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. No files, no problem. The bush way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
76. No Emails either, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #76
79. Need to search Rove's non-govt email accounts
:tin-foil-hat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Then let them all go.
This violates every sense of due process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes, let them go, and blame it on the Rethug admin. No files, no cases, ergo, no prosecutions . nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynnertic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. ...and then set those bad boys and their families up for life so that they are too comfortable
to be bothered with Al-Qaeda again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. You forgot to post the sarcasm thingy right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Hopefully but I doubt it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. Why should it be sarcastic?
Incarcerating people for years without charging them with a crime and then - when it looks like they might actually get their day in court - admitting that there is no supporting evidence for their incarceration. That is distinctly unfunny, imo.

There might be some 'bad guys' in with that lot - but how is anyone supposed to tell? At this point it's more likely that the incarceration has managed to radicalize those who were not 'bad guys' to start - but how is anyone supposed to tell?

No, I wasn't kidding. When law enforcement screws up and can't produce evidence to support a charge, the charge is dropped . . . or are we still going to use the Bush playbook and just accept the 'they're evil-doers because I say so' explanation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smith_3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #29
74. If there is no evidence against them they must be let go. Its that simple.
No files, no case. Too bad, but that's how the rule of law works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. They didn't even have close to up to date computers in the White House
what makes you think the B* misAdministration had the proper controls on it's prisoners and the charges against them?

The entire eight years was a gigantic clusterfuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Can't it all just be Pam's dream?

So much destruction. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. I would think the military in charge of the detention center would keep records
They're the ones being ordered to mistreat the prisoners. But as far as legal documentation, how could the prisoners have any files if their lawyers were never allowed to even talk to them?

And why can't they keep these prisoners in one of those detention centers they've built in this country? You know the ones they built in case of some catastrophic influx of illegal aliens that can house 5000 people at a time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
49. Why should we keep them?
We have NO PROOF thanks to Bush that these guys committed any crimes let alone being terrorist. And if we don't prosecute Bush we will regret that. Maybe some of these detainees would love to see the terrorist who locked them away stand trial. I know I would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
57. No way! The civilian * admin had their hands in everything
from directives to documenation. They had to control everything and that may be their downfall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. We can never, ever again
lose control over our government as we did for the last eight years. This is appalling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is preposterous. What a bunch of keystone cops.
Thank goodness adults are in charge now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. it is time we closed the cia, nsa and other intel services down. they are a cancer to our democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
34. The Kennedy brothers tried to reign in the CIA. Look where it got them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Too fast for me!
That's what I was going to say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bush and PNACs scorched earth policy
And yes, it all makes sense now. They're real goals are becoming much harder to ignore. I always knew that Bush was going to leave a wake of deeply scorched earth as his real legacy.

He thinks like a terrorist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. He is a terrorist
the whole mis-administration is/was/are. Throw their sorry traitorous asses in jail and throw away the fricking key already. fuck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. No files?
Clearly they had no intention of ever prosecuting or following up on any alleged "intelligence" gleaned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. This will be turned around on the PNAC crowd and used to bury them
Accused terrorists, and NO evidence of same. How BOOSHE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
15. if we followed our laws
. . . these prisoners would be ordered released.

No wonder they've been sitting there for so long without any resolution of their case. There is no existing case on some of them. What a joke. Records "scattered throughout the executive branch??" Where the fuck might that be and why is it so hard to get access to these files?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. Guantonomo was a show place
It's primary function was to send Americans a message. To the Right, it was "we're tough on terrorism". To us, it was "we don't need no stinkin' laws". Any records they had were shredded before Bush-Cheney vacated the premises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Not to mention its chilling effect on everybody. "This could be you if you speak out" Twofer
Edited on Sun Jan-25-09 11:58 AM by glitch
The "show" while the real work of the Bushes was done: looting the treasury for decades to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
19. I'm sure it was just an accident...
I seem to remember someone having the original files from all the detainee's as they were released through I think a FOIA request. Anyone else remember this? I had a list of detainee's that I went through, writing a summary of where they were picked up, and what they were suppose to have done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Torn_Scorned_Ignored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. Here's a list of prisoners
http://www.cageprisoners.com/page.php?id=10

Content of the Cageprisoners.com Report
Our report presents the names of approximately 480 detainees, and has identified the nationalities of a further 174. It organises detainees according to their nationalities, listing them alphabetically (according to their forenames) within each category. We have also listed the residents of a particular country along with their nationals. The number of prisoners of each nationality has also been mentioned. The respective countries have been arranged alphabetically, followed by a brief listing of those whose nationalities have not been identified.

In addition we have arranged the countries according to the numbers of citizens held in Cuba, for each state. The report concludes with a timeline of the released detainees.
To view photos, letters or for further information on a particular detainee, please follow the links to their respective profiles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. thank you!
that is way more comprehensive then what I was thinking of that was way back when.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. Now is a good time for people in the know to come forward
There is no excuse not to. President Obama has given an Executive Order protecting whistleblowers again. We need them to come forth.

I think they will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
22. Another Heckova Job! Or as Ollie says:
"This is another fine mess you've gotten us into!"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
23. mebbe they embedded microchips in each one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
24. Cheney replied "you want those files, then come up my ass and get them!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teknomanzer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
64. I would respond,
"Looks like there is room for my foot jackass!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
25. this way the pentagon is free to throw around any kind of numbers they like
there is no accountability throughout this entire previous administration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
26. Why would there be files? Answer me that.
Many of the people sitting in Guantanamo are there not because they were caught in the act of terrorism, but because they were in the midst of some sort of clan disagreement. Think of it as the al-Hatfield--al-McCoy Feud, and just like the famous American feud, these latter-day feuds are largely about land.

The Army knows this, but the CIA was so hell-bent on racking up huge numbers of captured Arabs so they could claim we were "winning the war on terrorism" they kept hauling them in and incarcerating them in Gitmo for no damn reason. So...no one ever kept records on them.

As to your allegation that we kept good guys while releasing bad guys...you're probably right, and it's easy to see why: the bad guys are harder to control, so they're going to get rid of them. Better to just keep good guys locked up so we can point to all the detainees and tell America, "you're safer tonight because these people are not running around your hometown blowing things up." Which would have been the case if we would have never arrested them at all, but let's not talk about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. I always figured it went something like this:
They'd grab a guy off the street. A supposed terrorist. Maybe he was, maybe he wasn't. That doesn't matter.

They start torturing him, asking "who are you working with?" Now he can't give a real name because either he's not going to rat on his friends or he doesn't know any real bad guys. But he's got to say something to stop the torture, so he remembers the neighbor whose dog used to shit in his yard all the time. He gives them his name.

Then they go and grab the neighbor. They torture him, asking "who are you working with?" and the cycle repeats itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #32
84. That's part of it...
but the CIA was buying Terrorist Suspects, and getting people in exactly the way I described.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
48. Exactly, which is why this is such a clusterfuck
There really should have been no need for a secret extra-judicial prison in the first place. People captured on the battlefield (most of them probably just participating in tribal battles as you said) can be held until the end of the war and then returned to their country when the war is over.

Those who are captured for suspected terrorist activity could be tried for it. The CIA just wanted free reign to break the law and Bush wanted a political issue to make the other side look "weak on terror". That's what this all comes down to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
27. Important information highly
compartmentalized or missing, making accountability difficult or impossible. Welcome to Cheneyland. The ones they kept are probably the ones that actually posed no danger but may be able to incriminate them later. Better to just try to completely break them like they broke Padilla make them hate us so much they become raving jihadists whether they were to start with or not to cover their tracks in the creation of this mess.

I just finished The Lucifer Effect by Phil Zimbardo. I highly recommend it.


From the website:

"He also began to feel anonymous because 'no one was listening to my position. It was clear that there was no accountability.' Moreover, the physical setting in which he found himself conferred total anonymity by its barren ugliness. Anonymity of place combined with anonymity of person, given that it became the norm to stop wearing their full military uniforms while on duty. And all around them, most visitors and the civilian interrogators came and went unnamed. No one in charge was readily identifiable, and the seemingly endless mass of prisoners, wearing orange jumpsuits or totally naked, were also indistinguishable from one another. It was as extreme a setting for creating deindividuation as I can imagine." (From Chapter 14, page 351)

From the preface to the book:

One of the dominant conclusions of the Stanford Prison Experiment is that the pervasive yet subtle power of a host of situational variables can dominate the individual's will to resist. That conclusion is further embellished and given greater depth in a set of chapters detailing this phenomenon across a body of social science research. We see how a range of research participants, other college student subjects and average citizen volunteers alike, come to conform, comply, obey, and are readily seduced into doing things they could not imagine doing when they were outside those situational force fields. A set of dynamic psychological processes are outlined which can induce good people to do evil, among them, deindividuation, obedience to authority, passivity in the face of threats, self justification and rationalization. Dehumanization is one of the central processes in the transformation of ordinary, normal people into indifferent or even wanton perpetrators of evil. Dehumanization is like a cortical cataract that clouds one’s thinking and fosters the perception that other people are less than human. It makes some people come to see those others as enemies deserving of torment, torture, and annihilation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. Demand prosecution of everyone involved.
From Bush, Cheney and Condi down to the commanding officers on scene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NM Independent Donating Member (794 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
33. Relentless Ideology and Apalling Incompetence.
These two things alone should forever be known as the worst failing qualities of W.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. Do you honestly think it was just incompetence?
I read this as a deliberate attempt to keep the international court/civil rights lawyers in the dark. If there are no files, then the Bush admin can not be charged with violating any number of international laws on detaining civilians and combatants... or at least that may be what they are hoping.

The files may have never been kept or may have been destroyed, but I don't think it was an accident at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NM Independent Donating Member (794 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #41
50. Of course not.
There's a bit of evil and good old fashioned CYA mixed in there as well.

We are, after all, talking about republics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #50
72. Just thought I'd check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
35. I'll say it again -- if there's no evidence, WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE BEING HELD???
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
36. Did Franz Kafka work for the Bush administration?
This is not incompetence: the CIA and the military have plenty of experience with detention procedures. They meant it to be this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
38. They're lying. Surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
39. If Bush and his cronies could have put half as much energy into doing what was right...
as they did in covering their own asses, there would be alot less misery and suffering in the world right now.

Kicked and Rec'd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
40. I'm sure it was just incompetence
and not something nefarious :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chollybocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
42. With no 'hard' evidence left behind, * & Rice & Cheney & Rummy MUST now be s.p. to testify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
43. The Nazis never kept files of Auschwitz, either
Sure, there were records of trains going back and forth and how many people they carried, but there were never any direct records of an extermination program or references to gas chamber killings.

Even the blueprints of the death camps never alluded to the true purpose of the facilities.

My guess is, they knew that such records could have been used against them if they ever lost the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
44. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
45. Let them go then
This is all Bush's fault. Set them up in his neighborhood. Hell if they sue that motherfucker they can live in his house. Hell we all should be able to sue Bush. I wonder if that would work? A class action lawsuit Bush/Cheney against the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
46. in the old days they called it "getting rid of the evidence"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
47. The Bush fiasco
a lasting legacy :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
51. This comes second hand, but....
my SO called this morning and apologized right off the bat because "I was watching Fox," he said...lol....but proceeded to say that there was a military guy on with Chris Wallace, and they were discussing this very issue.

Not only about no records, but the very real possibility that American citizens who may have gone against Bushco are there AND the military guy alluded to the fact that it isn't even military personnel working at Gitmo. He said something to the effect, "It's amazing that you don't even have to go to boot camp anymore; those are the guys watching Gitmo." Blackwater, most likely?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
52. What a bunch of incompetent assholes.
Under these morans, millions of emails disappear, billions of dollars disappear and when the law specifically asks for documentation, the GOP are unable to collect any.

However, when it comes to spying on innocent American citizens, they can't seem to collect enough information!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
53. I wonder if Obama is going to share this with the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
54. Send them to Crawford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juan_de_la_Dem Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
55. No files, no case, no reason for detention....let 'em out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
56. Still Bushed
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DallasNE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
58. This Has Dick Cheney's Fingerprints All Over It
This also suggests that no amount of looking will turn them up. Only if someone took some CYA copies will we know what happened. It is just like Bush's National Guard records. The suckers somehow just come up missing. Expect to find other embarrassing documents to have found their way into the shredders whether it is the outing of Valerie Plame Wilson or the US Attorney purge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zogtheobvious Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
59. What an absolute walking cluster-fuck of an adminstration.
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
60. The Bushies sure did learn from their predecessors, the nazis, so very well.
The Nazis' extensive penchant for recordkeeping sunk them at Nuremberg.

The Bushies LEARNED from their former allies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitty Herder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
61. This just blows my mind.
These criminals Bush bastards belong behind bars. By not creating files, they make it that much more difficult to give Gitmo prisoners to get the far trials they deserve. And I'm sure that's what they intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
62. A reason to suspend Habeus Corpus-- laziness.

No need to build a case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
63. NO FILES??? Release them all immediately for PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT.
And prosecute the folks who let this state of affairs exist.

Next Al Quaeda attack, we now get to say in all truthfulness that Bushco is 100% responsible due to their incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
65. So, Guantanamo= Crawford Ranch
i.e. ALL PROP

Why am I not shocked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
66. Count on corporate media to miss this story as much as possible
They will do all they can in trying to minimize any idea they were complicit in this and other bush-boy mis-administration crimes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
67. unfuckingreal nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
68. The good guys detained probably include some potential 9/11 whistleblowers,
Edited on Mon Jan-26-09 12:30 AM by Waiting For Everyman
who are likely now human vegetables. I'd bet that was the primary reason for opening that place and using those techniques to begin with.

Too much gets blamed on stupidity and incompetence. If they released dangerous people, they meant to; if they refused to release innocents, they meant that too.

That has always been true before, and I see no reason why this would be the first exception now.

Oh and, I'm sure that's why there are no files.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
69. I'm shocked . .. the Nazis used to keep files . . . !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
70. The way to approach this problem is the opposite of what you might expect....
Convene a team of investigators to compile a list of individuals who would have been in charge of creating and maintaining records on the detainees, and their superiors. Place them under oath and question them about the existence and locations of the missing files, and who gave them their orders --- and then charge them with criminal perjury and/or obstruction of justice if they lie or refuse to testify truthfully.

Sending out officials on a 'scavenger hunt' to scour the entire Federal Government is no way to handle this.

When people start getting charged criminally and going to jail... memories will clear up and cooperation will ensue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
71. I smell obstruction of justice.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Dog Dominion Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
73. information on individual prisoners is “scattered throughout the executive branch”
I know some of you like to have your blood pressure elevated for some reason, but you can calm down for a sec.

Ahhhh-Oooooooooooom.
Ahhhh-Oooooooooooom.
Ahhhh-Oooooooooooom.

Better? Now get pissed off again. Just looks like a departmentmental pissing contests.

http://washingtonindependent.com/27182/gitmo-prisoner-case-files-a-mess

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #73
80. I could not find a blue one
Edited on Mon Jan-26-09 10:03 AM by Moochy


But really now, Blue Dog Dominion(ist)? who lost their fucking sock?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Optical.Catalyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
75. Video tape the testimony from everyone ot these detainees to be used as evidence against Bush
Bush is guilty of war crimes, torture, and illegal imprisonment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
77. Shredded or burned just like the Nazis did near the end of WWII
...to cover the Gitmo interrogator's tracks. Lack of files and paperwork is an absolute indicator that crimes against humanity were being committed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
78. What did I say before 1/20?
Chimp and Cheney destroyed any evidence of what happened behind the scenes the last 8 years. Remember Nixon's 18-minute gap in a tape recording? This will be an 8 year gap. Documents vaporized, hard drives destroyed and buried in some landfill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
condoleeza Donating Member (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #78
81. Were these files in the boxes Cheney injured himself moving?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #81
82. Sounds plausible to me.
With that crew anything's not out of the realm of possibility if they're covering their trail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
14thColony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
83. I know two guys who were intelligence analysts at Gitmo
I talked to each at different times, and neither of them has ever met the other.

One told me in his opinion 2/3 of the people in there had never done anything.

Unprompted, the other separately set the number at 3/4 of those in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC