|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 05:47 PM Original message |
OK, Mr. Conyers, we're tired of you crying wolf. If he doesn't show this time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtbymark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
1. I second that motion n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. I want to see Rove in handcuffs... Drag him in kicking and screaming.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sydnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. He who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MinneapolisMatt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 05:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Rove. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sydnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 05:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. I am very glad to hear this news. Now, go get him! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 05:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Rove. Conyers sent him another subpoena. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sydnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 05:58 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. I hope he doesn't show so they can round his ass up and charge him with contempt too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Whitey Corngood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
5. God damnit I want this photo to become reality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 05:56 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. I was thinking about that photo and wondered who had a copy of it... I like that one.. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
7. let's see what nancy has to say about this...she better support it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
10. AMEN!! But at the same time, he was being thwarted by Nancy Pelosi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Siwsan (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 06:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. He told us this gem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 06:12 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. WOW!!! Very interesting. Reminds me of that "On the Couch" book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 07:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. wow. that's actually believable. so, now that he's outta power lets throw the book at 'em! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 09:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
36. Conyers actually *said* that?? It's settled for me then: Conyers had been blackmailed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-27-09 07:53 AM Response to Reply #36 |
47. Which means he's been compromised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 07:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. false |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 10:11 PM Response to Reply #27 |
38. Gotcha. Thanks for the clarification. Regardless of semantics, KKKarl needs to show up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Siwsan (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
11. Agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
populistdriven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 07:50 PM Response to Reply #11 |
24. Ask him about the RIAA / BET Analog Hole bill while you have his ear. He is out of touch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
13. conyers actually do something??? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! yeah right. all he can do is talk n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
populistdriven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 07:48 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. Unless the RIAA / BET is paying for Dinner then Conyers is a typical DC Politician. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-27-09 07:42 AM Response to Reply #13 |
44. Amen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
15. Good Call. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
16. He could just make a statement deputizing all American Citizens as temporary Sergeants-at-Arms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gordianot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 06:14 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. The Sargent of Arms has what I recall is a ceremonial mace. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
19. Second that have the US Marshals arrest him and drag him before the committee. NOW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 06:33 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I can think of other ways |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 07:54 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. Assuming Eric Holder is confirmed, inherent contempt is unnecessary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 08:41 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. Rove will go before Congress, or he'll go to jail, bout damn time too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
23. Now he can send the contempt citation to Holder. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
25. if he doesn't show then it's in Obama's court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 09:28 PM Response to Reply #25 |
35. There is such a thing as inherent contempt, and Conyers should use it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
26. Rep. Conyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 08:34 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Apparently, voters in Michigan disagree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 09:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. I would be pleased |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 09:37 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. I don't presume to know the minds of voters but I think it's safe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 10:14 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Oh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-27-09 07:49 AM Response to Reply #30 |
46. And? That makes what difference? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-27-09 10:13 AM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Michigan voters APPARENTLY don't think he is a 'lousy choice,' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CitizenPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
29. well, he can't do that without the DoJ's help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4 t 4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 08:38 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Maybe three will be the charm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CitizenPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 08:53 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. I feel your pain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-27-09 07:35 AM Response to Reply #29 |
43. He can hold Rove in inherent contempt. He can order the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-27-09 07:43 AM Response to Reply #29 |
45. Exactly, the law has to be followed which the Chimpadministration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
40. AMEN ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
41. rove is like lucy pulling the ball away from conyers all the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
42. If he doesn't show this time, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-27-09 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
49. and pls ask rove about what he requested of Tom Noe ('04 Election in Ohio) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC