Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Link To Key E-Mails - PROOF - DOJ Plainly Misled Congress & INTENDED To Mislead Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 08:35 AM
Original message
Link To Key E-Mails - PROOF - DOJ Plainly Misled Congress & INTENDED To Mislead Congress
Here's the link to the key emails, http://www.realcities.com/multimedia/nationalchannel/archive/mcw/pdf/usattorneys/032307_8.pdf via McClatchy. It's hard to read these and not wonder how the US can have a head of the Justice Department who it is demonstrated so plainly truly misled Congress and intended to mislead Congress, whatever artful excuse and dissembling he comes up with today for why what he said wasn't exactly a lie. It's also hard to read these emails and not be filled with contempt for a lot of these people. What's it all for? Clinging to power. Nothing more principled than that.

And why, on page 3 here http://www.realcities.com/multimedia/nationalchannel/archive/mcw/pdf/usattorneys/032307_8.pdf , is Kyle Sampson sending emails to J. Scott Jennnings, at SJennings@gwb43.com, RE: USATTY? Here's who Jennings is http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=J._Scott_Jennings. Is the White House political office allowed to work on a non government communications system while doing White House business? I would think not.

http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/005862.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
good grief!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Your last question is a GREAT one!
Is the White House political office allowed to work on a non government communications system while doing White House business?

I don't know! It sounds very suspicious to me, and I hope one of our DU lawyers cancite a law that answers it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. here's a good thread about that
ROVE - 95% Of E-mails on RNC-Based Account (GWB43) - May Have Forfeited Claims Of Exec Privilege
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x492538


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ms liberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Down with their claim of Executive privilege! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Gonzo 'mis-spoke' himself. Smirk, Smirk, smirk." - Commander AWOL
Edited on Sat Mar-24-07 09:15 AM by SpiralHawk
"No one expects republicon cronies to tell the truth anyway. So get over it. You noisy proles can just shut up and sit down. Smirk, smirk, smirk."

- Commander AWOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. you took a picture of my nightstand drawer???
some people! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. there's already a thread on this, see here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Note p.6 has "new business/old business" in meeting schedule with absolutely
NO DETAILS re: what the business is.

Either Sampson is being very secretive or he deliberately go rid of the items before sending it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. K & R nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Repub Congress was never misled-they were NEVER there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC